Abstract
Responsible research and innovation (RRI) considers the impact of research and development on those who are likely to be directly or indirectly impacted by those activities, and provides a direction for the future of research practices in science and technology for the greater good. In the practical world of the lab or research group therefore, guidelines to assist researchers and scientists in the application of those RRI principles are needed. However, this paper is not concerned with the creation of guidelines themselves, but presents an RRI approach to identifying the requirements for guidelines. This is a first step that is often overlooked or presented as a fait accompli and yet it provides an essential factor in the eventual success or failure of guidelines, created for any purpose. What is required in a set of guidelines however, is not only dictated by the preferred outcome, but is also reflected in the process of its creation. Therefore, an RRI approach to identifying those requirements should also practice what the resulting RRI guidelines preach. Whilst initially developed for the production of guidelines for researchers in an EU RRI project, these approaches and principles can be applied across all disciplines when a set of guidelines need to be developed. The approach taken here, utilized several steps in its implementation. Firstly, through a review of the literature and an examination of guideline development in several research projects, a set of indicative requirements were created. A workshop/focus group with researchers from a range of disciplines, career stages and institutions led to the production of the second iteration, which then received further input from both experts in the field of RRI, philosophy and ethics. This led to the creation of the table of requirements for guidelines. By utilizing the core principles of RRI and through a critical and reflexive approach, this work presents a new technique for identifying first line steps in the creation of guidelines. The practical and flexible nature of this approach means that researchers and policy-makers are invited to use this method in their own guideline development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blok V (2014) Look who’s talking: responsible innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(2):171–190
Bovens M, Schillemans T, Goodin RE (2014) Public accountability. In: Bovens M, Goodin RE, Schillemans T (eds) The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–20
Doorn N (2012) Exploring responsibility rationales in Research and Development (R&D). Sci Technol Hum Values 37(3):180–209
EPSRC (2014) Framework for Responsible Innovation. http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/index.cfm/research/framework/
Fedor CA, Cola PA, Pierre C (eds) (2006) Responsible research: a guide for coordinators. Remedica, Limassol
Felt U, Fochler M (2010) Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement. https://sts.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/dep_sciencestudies/pdf_files/Preprints/felt_fochler_machineries_Aug2010.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
Friedman A, Miles S (2006) Stakeholders: theory and practice. OUP, Oxford
Gardner H (1983) Frames of mind. Basic Book Inc., New York
Grimpe B, Patel M, Jirotka M, Wilford S, Niemelä M, Ikonen V (2014) Context of RRI report. GREAT (Governance of Responsible Innovation) FP7 Grant Agreement No: n°321480. http://www.great-project.eu/research/deliverables
Groves C (2006) Technological futures and non---reciprocal responsibility. Int J Humanit 4(2):57–61
Grunwald A (2011) Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7:9–31
Jessop B (2003) Governance and metagovernance: on reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony. In: Bang HP (ed) Governance, as social and political communication. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 142–172
Joss S, Browlea A (1999) Considering the concept of procedural justice for public policy and decision-making in Science and Technology dossier. Special Issue on Public Participation in Science and Technology. Sci Public Policy 26(N° 5):321–330
Krueger CR, Casey MA (2000) Focus groups. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Lenoble J, Maesschalck M (2003) Toward a theory of governance: the action of norms. Kluwer Law International, New York
Maesschalck M (2001) Normes et Contextes. Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim
Moor JH (1985) What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy 16(4:)266–275
Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy Journal 39(6):751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093
Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten PM, Fisher E, Gorman M, Guston DH (2013) A framework for responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Journal of Responsible Innovation. John Wiley, London, p 27–50
Pandza K, Ellwood P (2013) Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation. Research Policy Journal 42:1112–1125
Pelle S, Reber B (2013) The Theoretical landscape. GREAT (Governance of Responsible Innovation) FP7 Grant Agreement No: n°321480. http://www.great-project.eu/deliverables_files/deliverables03
Pellé S, Reber B (2015) Responsible innovation in the light of moral responsibility. Journal on Chain and Network Science 15(2):107–117
Pellizzoni L (2004) Responsibility and environmental governance. Environmental Politics 13(3):541–565
Rowe G, Frewer JL (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Values 25(1):3–29
Stahl BC (2012) Responsible research and innovation in information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 21:207–211
Stahl BC, Wakunuma K (2015) Guidelines Handbook. CONSIDER (Civil Society Organisations in Designing Research Governance). FP7 Grant Agreement No: 288928. http://www.consider-project.eu/
Stahl BC, Eden G, Jirotka M (2013) Responsible research and innovation in information and communication technology. Identifying and engaging with the ethical implications of ICTs. In: Owen R, Heintz M, Bessant J (eds) Journal of Responsible Innovation. Wiley, Chichester
Stilgoe J, Own R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580
Sutcliffe H (2011) A report on responsible research & innovation. DG Research and Innovation of the European Commission. Located at Http://ec.Europa.Eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-Report-Hilarysutcliffe_en.Pdf. Retrieved from http://www.matterforall.org/pdf/RRI-Report2.pdf
Timmermans J, Stahl BC (2013) Annual Report on the main trends of SiS, in particular the trends related to RRI. GREAT (Governance of Responsible Innovation) FP7 Grant Agreement No: n°321480. http://www.great-project.eu/deliverables_files/deliverables05
Van de Poel I (2011) The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In: Vincent I, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 37–52
Von Schomberg R (2012) Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of responsible research and Innovation. In: Dusseldorp M, Beecroft R (eds) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 39–61 Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6_2
Wilford S, Timmermans J, Grimpe B, Jirotka M (2014) Requirements for guidelines. GREAT (Governance of Responsible Innovation) FP7 Grant Agreement No: n°321480. http://www.great-project.eu/Deliverables16
Wilford S, Fisk M, Stahl BC (2016) Guidelines for responsible research and innovation. GREAT (Governance of Responsible Innovation) FP7 Grant Agreement No: n°321480. http://www.great-project.eu/Deliverables10
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Pro-gramme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreements n° 321480 (GREAT).
Thanks to the GREAT project consortium for their valuable input to the process of developing the requirements for guidelines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilford, S.H. First Line Steps in Requirements Identification for Guidelines Development in Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). Syst Pract Action Res 31, 539–556 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9445-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9445-z