Skip to main content
Log in

Leadership and Learning: A Critical Reexamination of Senge’s Learning Organization

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From its inception the concept of the learning organization has been identified with a particular type of organization or new forms of organizational learning. But it is often forgotten that Senge’s ‘system thinking’ formulation of the learning organization was inseparable from an attempt to reformulate a new way of thinking about change agency and leadership in organizations. Here it is argued that Senge’s learning organization can be re-conceptualised as a partial fusion of ‘systems thinking’ and learning theories that leads to a concept of organizational learning as a form of ‘distributed leadership’. However, the concept is critically flawed because it cannot theorise the organizing practices by which learning to lead and leading to learn are shared or distributed in organizations. It is concluded that Senge’s under-theorized focus on distributed leadership consistently neglects issues of practice and issues of power. As such his work does not provide an exploration of the possibilities for increasing the dispersal of human agency, power, knowledge and autonomy within the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams M (2003) The reflexive self and culture: a critique. Br J Sociol 54:221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (2003) A life full of learning. Organ Stud 24(7):1178–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (2004) Reasons and rationalizations: the limits of organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schon DA (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong H (2000) The learning organization: changed means to an unchanged end. Organization 72(2):355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker JR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams. Adm Sci Q 38:408–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organ Dyn 13:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (2000) The future of leadership in learning organizations. J Leadersh Stud 3:18–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baton J, Emery M, Flood R, Selsky J, Wolstenholme DE (2004) A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives. Syst Pract Action Res 17:3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berson Y, Nemanich LA, Waldman DA, Galvin BM, Keller RT (2006) Leadership and organizational learning: a multiple levels perspective. Leadersh Q 17:577–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacker F, Regan S (2009) Intentionality, agency and change: practice theory and management. Manag Learn 40(2):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2004) Science of science and reflexivity. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford DL, Burke WW (2004) Introduction: Is OD in crisis? J Appl Behav Sci 40(4):369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui K, Baruch Y (2010) Creating learning organizations in higher education: applying a systems perspective. Learn Organ 17(3):208–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (2003) Emergence and convergence. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnes B (2004) Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: a re-appraisal. J Manag Stud 41(6):977–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell R (2005) Things fall apart? Discourses on agency and change in organizations. Hum Relat 58(1):83–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell R (2006) Agency and change: rethinking change agency in organizations. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Contu A, Grey C, Ortenblad A (2003) Against learning. Hum Relat 56(8):931–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coopey J (1995) The learning organization: power, politics and ideology. Manag Learn 26(2):193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe A (2004) On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. J Manag Educ 28(4):407–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver M (2002) The learning organization: Foucauldian gloom or utopian sunshine. Hum Relat 55(1):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M (1997) Disciplines of organizational learning: contributions and critiques. Hum Relat 50(9):1085–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer B (2001) The learning organization: an undelivered promise. Manag Learn 32(4):437–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer B (2004) Organizational learning: the “third way”. Manag Learn 35(4):419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (1998) Fifth discipline: review and discussion. Syst Pract Action Res 11(3):259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood LR (1999) Rethinking the fifth discipline. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood LR (2009) The relationship of “systems thinking” to action research. Syst Pract Action Res 23(4):269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2002) The subject and power, In: Michel Foucault (ed) The essential works, power, vol 3. Penguin Books, London

  • Fox S (2006) Inquiries of every imaginable kind: ethnomethodology, practical action and the new socially situated learning theory. Sociol Rev 54(3):426–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman V,J, Lipshitz R, Popper M (2005) The mystification of organizational learning. J Manag Inq 14(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger D (2009) Revisiting the concept of practice: toward an argumentative understanding of practicing. Manag Learn 40(2):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S (2000) Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization 7(2):211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S (2009) Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: an introduction. Learn Organ 16(5):352–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieves J (2008) Why we should abandon the idea of the learning organization. Learn Organ 159(6):463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn P (2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadersh Quart 13:423–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn P (2009) Immaculate consummation: learning meets leadership. Int J Leadersh Educ 12(3):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris A, Leithwood K, Day C, Sammons P, Hopkins D (2007) Distributed leadership and organizational change: reviewing the evidence. J Educ Change 8(4):337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P, Duberley J (2003) Reflexivity in management research. J Manag Stud 40(3):1279–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2000) Should systems dynamics be described as a “hard” or “deterministic” systems approach. Syst Res Behav Sci 17(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1999) The complete social scientist. In: Gold M (ed) A Kurt Lewin reader. American Psychological Society Press, New York

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (2000) Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory Cult Soc 17(3):26–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall N (2009) Cognitive and practice-based theories of organizational knowledge and learning: incompatible or complementary? Manag Learn 40(2):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazutis D, Slawinski N (2008) Leading organizational learning through authentic dialogue. Manag Learn 39(4):437–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., Ed. (2003). Systems thinking: volume I: general systems theory, cybernetics and complexity; volume II: systems theories and modelling; volume III: second order cybernetics, systemic therapy and soft systems thinking; volume IV: critical systems thinking and systemic perspectives on ethics, power and pluralism. Sage, London

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inform Syst Res 7(1):63–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W (2002) Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ Sci 13(2):49–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortenblad A (2002) A typology of the idea of learning organization. Manag Learn 33(2):213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortenblad A (2007) Senge’s many faces: problem or opportunity? Learn Organ 14(2):108–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1951) The social system. Free Press, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin J (2007) Toward an epistemology of practice. Acad Manag Learn Educ 6(4):495–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5(2):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon EH (1996) Kurt Lewin’s change theory in the field and in the classroom: notes toward a model of managed learning. Syst Pract Action Res 9(1):27–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1990a) The fifth discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Century Business, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1990b) The leader’s new work: building the learning organization. Sloan Manag Rev 32(1):7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1991) The learning organization made plain. Train Dev 45(10):37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1996a) Rethinking leadership in the learning organization. Syst Think 7(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1996b) Leading learning organizations. Train Dev 50(12):36–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1996c) Leading learning organizations. The bold, the powerful, and the invisible. Chapter 5:41–58. In: Hesselbein F, M Goldsmith et al. (eds) The leader of the future. Jossey Bass, Inc, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1999a) Learning for a change. Fast Co 24(May):178–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1999b) Towards an ecology of leadership: development journeys of three leaders, change and development journeys into a pluralistic world. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago

  • Senge P (2001) Illuminating the blind spot: leadership in the context of emerging worlds. www.dialogonleadership.org/SengeComment.html

  • Senge P (2003) Taking personal change seriously: the impact of organizational learning on management practice. Acad Manag Exec 17(2):47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (2006) The fifth discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, 2nd edn. Century, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (2007) Collaborating for systemic change. Sloan Manag Rev 48(2):44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (2009) The necessary revolution: how we got into this mess. Reflect Soc Learn J 9(2):20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM, Sterman JD (1992) Systems thinking and organizational learning—acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. Eur J Oper Res 59(1):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge P, Roberts C, Ross R, Smith BJ, Kleiner A (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook. Century, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Roth G, Ross R (1999) The dance of change: The Challenges of Sustaining the Learning Organization. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM, Heifetz RA, Torbert B (2000) A conversation on leadership. Reflect Soc Learn J 2(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2008) The learning organization turns 15: a retrospective. Learn Organ 15(6):441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (2005) Complex knowledge: studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ Sci 13:567–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Poole SP (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20:510–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick K (1991) The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7(2):225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott H (1993) Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations. J Manag Stud 30(4):515–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF (2003) Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 19(1):7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond Caldwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caldwell, R. Leadership and Learning: A Critical Reexamination of Senge’s Learning Organization. Syst Pract Action Res 25, 39–55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9201-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9201-0

Keywords

Navigation