Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Systems Theoretical Approach to Interoperability of Information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rapid process of hybridisation of man and technology, organisation and technology and society and technology is currently sweeping the world. This process requires a way of (scientific) thinking that takes hybrid systems as the starting point. Such an approach makes it increasingly important for hybrid systems to be interlinked, enabling them to exchange and share information through these links. This linking of (hybrid) systems to enable them to exchange and share information can also be denoted as the realisation of interoperability between (hybrid) systems. Five principles from Luhmann’s systems theory can help us understand interoperability. Interoperability enables (hybrid) systems to join random coalitions and networks. The network centric warfare concept is currently the basis for international efforts aimed at the development and application of interoperability that would enable armed forces to act effectively and efficiently. This paper demonstrates what we can learn from Luhmann’s system’s theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1971) Towards a system of system concept. Manag Sci 17(11):661–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams TK (2001) Future warfare and the decline of human decision making. Parameters 2001–2002(Winter):57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts DS (2002) Information age transformation. CCRP, Washington, ISBN 1893723062

  • Alberts DS, Garstka JJ, Stein FP (2000) Network centric warfare—developing and leveraging information superiority. CCRP, Washington, ISBN 1579060196

  • Altmann J (2004) Military uses of nanotechnology: perspectives and concerns. Secur Dialogue 35:61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage J (2003) Militarized bodies: an introduction. Body Soc 9(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnall A, Parr D (2005) Moving the nanoscience and technology (NST) debate forwards: short-term impacts, long-term uncertainty and the social constitution. Technol Soc 27:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arquilla J, Ronfeldt D (2000) Swarming and the future of conflict. Rand National Defense Research Institute, Santa Monica

  • Atkinson SR, Moffat J (2005) The agile organization. From informal networks to complex effects and agility. CCRP Publication Series, Washington, ISBN 189372316x

  • Baecker D (2001) Managing corporations in networks. Thesis Eleven 66:80–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes B (2005) Elusive memories of technoscience. Perspect Sci 13(2):142–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard J (1994) Simulacra and simulations. University of Michigan, Michigan, ISBN 0472095218

  • Blackmore T (2005) Dead slow: unmanned aerial vehicles loitering in battlespace. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti R (2006) Posthuman all too human: towards a new process ontology. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney D, Fisher D, Morris E, Place P (2005) Some current approaches to interoperability. Integration of software intensive systems initiative. Carnegie Mellon, SEI, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R (2005) Peripheral vision: relationality. Org Stud 26(11):1989–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R (2007) Organs of process: rethinking human organization. Org Stud 28(10):1547–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin B (2000) Strategic intelligence and networked business. J Inf Sci 26:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin B (2001) Information warfare: peering inside Pandora’s postmodern box. Libr Rev 50:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon M (2002) Network society, network-centric warfare and the state of emergency. Theory Cult Soc 19:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodeman R (2004) Nanotechnology: the visible and the invisible. Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodeman R, Klein JT, Carl M, Nancy T (2007) Interdisciplinary studies in science technology and society: new directions: science, humanities policy. Technol Soc 29:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gane N (2006a) Posthuman. Theory Cult Soc 23:431–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gane N (2006b) Simulation. Theory Cult Soc 23:282–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gane N (2006c) When we have never been human what is to be done? Interview with Donna Haraway. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray CH (2003) Posthuman soldiers in postmodern war. Body Soc 9(4):215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (1991) A cyborg manifesto science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century. Routledge, New York, ISBN 0415903866

  • Hayles KN (2006a) Traumas of code. Crit inq 33:136–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayles KN (2006b) Unfinished work: from cyborg to cognisphere. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber R, Langsaeter T, Eggenhofer P, Freire F, Grilo A, Grisogno AM, Martins J, Roemer J, Spaans M, Titze K (2008) The Indian Ocean tsunami: a case study investigation by NATO RTO SAS-065 part two: the case of Aceh and North Sumatra. CCRP-NATO

  • IDABC (2004) European interoperability framework for pan-European eGovernment services. IDABC, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde D, Selinger E (2003) Chasing technoscience. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, ISBN 0253342538

  • Joint Vision 2010 (1995) Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. DoD

  • Joint Vision 2020 (2005) Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. DoD

  • Kittler FA (1996) The History of Communication media. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=45

  • Kittler FA (1997) Literature, media, information systems. OPA Amsterdam, Amsterdam, ISBN 9057010615

  • Kittler FA (2006) Thinking colours and/or machines. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger M, Stewart C (2003) The architecture of complexity. Cult Org 9:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn ThS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. Chicago University Press, Chicago, ISBN 0226458083

  • Latham A (2002) Warfare transformed: a Braudelian perspective on the ‘revolution in military affairs’. Eur J Int Relat 8:231–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1988) How to write ‘the prince’ for machines as for machinations. In: Elliott B (ed) Technology and social process. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

  • Latour B (2002) Morality and technology: the end of means. Theory Cult Soc 19(5/6):247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvaitis A (2008) Challenges of implementation of the network centric warfare tenets in coalition environments. Baltic security & Defense review 10:143–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1986) Autopoiesis: what is communication. Communication Theory

  • Luhmann N (1992) The concept of society. Thesis Elev 31:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, ISBN 0804726256

  • Luhmann N (1996) On the scientific context of the concept of communication. Soc Sci Inf 35:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1997) The control of intransparency. Syst Res Behav Sci 15:359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2006) Systems as difference. Organization 13:37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuire S (2006) Technology. Theory Cult Soc 23(2–3):253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defence UK (2005) Network enabled capabilities, JSP 777 edn. 1, Jan 2005

  • Ministry of Defence UK (2008) British defence doctrine. The Development Concepts and Doctrine Centre, Wiltshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell PT (2006) Freedom and control networks in military environments. Working paper, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Singapore

  • Moffat J (2008) The response to hurricane Katrina. A case study of changing C2 maturity. NATO RTO SAS-065. CCRP-NATO

  • NATO (2006a) NATO networked-enabled capability—vision and concept

  • NATO (2006b) Riga summit declaration

  • Nolin PC (2006) Interoperability: the need for transatlantic harmonisation. NATO Parliamentary Assembly

  • Nolin PC (2007) Transforming the future of warfare: network-enabled capabilities and unmanned systems. NATO Parliamentary Assembly

  • Pels D, Hetherington K, Vandenberghe F (2002) The status of the object: performances, mediations and techniques. Theory Cult Soc 19(5/6):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phister PW, Allen D, Barath J, Brandenberger U, Bruehlmann Burton A, Farell PhSE, Marien G (2008) Pakistan earthquake case study. NATO RTO SAS-065. CCRP-NATO

  • Richter R, Huber K, Lechner U (2008) The Elbe flood 2002. A case study on C2 systems and inter-organizational coordination. NATO RTO SAS-065. CCRP-NATO

  • Sheetz T, Vidal J, Pearson TD, Lozano K (2005). Nanotechnology: awareness and societal concerns. Technol Soc 27:329–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer PW (2009) Wired for war The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. The Penguin Press, New York, ISBN 9781594201981

  • Smith EA (2006) Complexity, networking, and effects-based approaches to operations. CCRP, Washington, ISBN 1893723186

  • Szepesy JE (2005) The strategic corporal and the emerging battlefield. The nexus between the USMC’s three block war concept and network centric warfare. The Fletcher School, Charlotte

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson F, Roberts N (2006) "Netcentric" organization. Public administration review, July/August 2006, pp. 619–622

  • Van Dyke Parunak H (2003) Making swarming happen. In: Conference of swarming and C4ISR

  • Van Lier B (2009) Luhmann ontmoet ‘the Matrix’. Uitwisselen en delen van informatie in netcentrische omgevingen. Eburon, Delft, ISBN 9789059723085

  • Varela R, Maturana HR, Urbie R (1974) Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems 5:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1969) General system theory foundations development applications. George Braziller Inc, New York ISBN 9780807604533

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman J (2002) Addressing technological change: the challenge to social theory. Curr Soc 50:347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman J (2006) New connections: social studies of science and technology and studies of work. Work Employ Soc 20:773–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage publications, Thoudsand Oakes, ISBN 0803971761

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centric, P.O. Box 338, 2800 AH, Gouda, The Netherlands

    Ben van Lier

  2. RSM Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Teun Hardjono

Authors
  1. Ben van Lier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teun Hardjono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben van Lier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Lier, B., Hardjono, T. A Systems Theoretical Approach to Interoperability of Information. Syst Pract Action Res 24, 479–497 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9197-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9197-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation