Abstract
Sudden short-duration decreases in cosmic ray flux, known as Forbush decreases (FDs), are mainly caused by interplanetary disturbances. A generally accepted view is that the first step of an FD is caused by a shock sheath and the second step is due to the magnetic cloud (MC) of the interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME). This simplistic picture does not consider several physical aspects, such as whether the complete shock sheath or MC (or only part of these) contributes to the decrease or the effect of internal structure within the shock-sheath region or MC. We present an analysis of 16 large (\({\geq}\,8 \%\)) FD events and the associated ICMEs, a majority of which show multiple steps in the FD profile. We propose a reclassification of FD events according to the number of steps observed in their respective profiles and according to the physical origin of these steps. This study determines that 13 out of 16 major events (\({\sim}\,81\%\)) can be explained completely or partially on the basis of the classic FD model. However, it cannot explain all the steps observed in these events. Our analysis clearly indicates that not only broad regions (shock sheath and MC), but also localized structures within the shock sheath and MC have a significant role in influencing the FD profile. The detailed analysis in the present work is expected to contribute toward a better understanding of the relationship between FD and ICME parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arunbabu, K., Antia, H., Dugad, S., Gupta, S., Hayashi, Y., Kawakami, S., Mohanty, P., Nonaka, T., Oshima, A., Subramanian, P.: 2013, High-rigidity Forbush decreases: Due to CMEs or shocks? Astron. Astrophys. 555, A139.
Badruddin: 2002a, Shock orientations, magnetic turbulence and Forbush decreases. Solar Phys. 209(1), 195.
Badruddin: 2002b, Transient modulation of cosmic ray intensity: Role of magnetic clouds and turbulent interaction regions. Astrophys. Space Sci. 281(3), 651.
Barnden, L.: 1973, The large-scale magnetic field configuration associated with Forbush decreases. In: International Cosmic Ray Conference 2, 1277.
Belov, A.: 2008, Forbush effects and their connection with solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic phenomena. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 4(S257), 439.
Belov, A., Eroshenko, E., Oleneva, V., Struminsky, A., Yanke, V.: 2001, What determines the magnitude of Forbush decreases? Adv. Space Res. 27(3), 625.
Belov, A., Abunin, A., Abunina, M., Eroshenko, E., Oleneva, V., Yanke, V., Papaioannou, A., Mavromichalaki, H., Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S.: 2014, Coronal mass ejections and non-recurrent Forbush decreases. Solar Phys. 289(10), 3949.
Bhaskar, A., Subramanian, P., Vichare, G.: 2016, Relative contribution of the magnetic field barrier and solar wind speed in ICME-associated Forbush decreases. Astrophys. J. 828(2), 104.
Bhaskar, A., Vichare, G., Arunbabu, K., Raghav, A.: 2016, Role of solar wind speed and interplanetary magnetic field during two-step Forbush decreases caused by interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. Space Sci. 361(7), 1.
Bhaskar, A., Ramesh, D.S., Vichare, G., Koganti, T., Gurubaran, S.: 2017, Quantitative assessment of drivers of recent global temperature variability: An information theoretic approach. Clim. Dyn., 1.
Candia, J., Roulet, E.: 2004, Diffusion and drift of cosmic rays in highly turbulent magnetic fields. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2004(10), 007.
Cane, H.V.: 2000, Coronal mass ejections and Forbush decreases. Space Sci. Rev. 93(1 – 2), 55.
Dumbović, M., Vršnak, B., Čalogović, J., Karlica, M.: 2011, Cosmic ray modulation by solar wind disturbances. Astron. Astrophys. 531, A91.
Dumbović, M., Vršnak, B., Čalogović, J., Župan, R.: 2012, Cosmic ray modulation by different types of solar wind disturbances. Astron. Astrophys. 538, A28.
Giacalone, J., Jokipii, J.: 1999, The transport of cosmic rays across a turbulent magnetic field. Astrophys. J. 520(1), 204.
Hess, V.F., Demmelmair, A.: 1937, World-wide effect in cosmic ray intensity as observed during a recent magnetic storm. Nature 140, 316.
Jordan, A., Spence, H.E., Blake, J., Shaul, D.: 2011, Revisiting two-step Forbush decreases. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 116(A11).
Khabarova, O.V., Zank, G.P., Li, G., Malandraki, O.E., le Roux, J.A., Webb, G.M.: 2016, Small-scale magnetic islands in the solar wind and their role in particle acceleration. II. Particle energization inside magnetically confined cavities. Astrophys. J. 827(2), 122.
Khabarova, O., Zank, G., Li, G., le Roux, J., Webb, G., Dosch, A., Malandraki, O.: 2015, Small-scale magnetic islands in the solar wind and their role in particle acceleration. I. dynamics of magnetic islands near the heliospheric current sheet. Astrophys. J. 808(2), 181.
Papaioannou, A., Malandraki, O., Belov, A., Skoug, R., Mavromichalaki, H., Eroshenko, E., Abunin, A., Lepri, S.: 2010, On the analysis of the complex Forbush decreases of January 2005. Solar Phys. 266(1), 181.
Potgieter, M.S.: 2013, Solar modulation of cosmic rays. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 10(1), 1.
Raghav, A., Bhaskar, A., Lotekar, A., Vichare, G., Yadav, V.: 2014, Quantitative understanding of Forbush decrease drivers based on shock-only and CME-only models using global signature of February 14, 1978 event. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014(10), 074.
Richardson, I., Cane, H.: 2010, Near-Earth interplanetary coronal mass ejections during solar cycle 23 (1996 – 2009): Catalog and summary of properties. Solar Phys. 264(1), 189.
Richardson, I., Cane, H.: 2011, Galactic cosmic ray intensity response to interplanetary coronal mass ejections/magnetic clouds in 1995 – 2009. Solar Phys. 270(2), 609.
Richardson, I., Wibberenz, G., Cane, H.: 1996, The relationship between recurring cosmic ray depressions and corotating solar wind streams at \({\leq}\,1~\mbox{AU}\): IMP 8 and Helios 1 and 2 anticoincidence guard rate observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 101(A6), 13483.
Shaikh, Z., Raghav, A., Bhaskar, A.: 2016, Presence of turbulent and ordered local structure within ICME shock-sheath and its contribution in Forbush decrease. Astrophys. J. Accepted. arXiv .
Subramanian, P., Antia, H., Dugad, S., Goswami, U., Gupta, S., Hayashi, Y., Ito, N., Kawakami, S., Kojima, H., Mohanty, P., et al.: 2009, Forbush decreases and turbulence levels at coronal mass ejection fronts. Astron. Astrophys. 494(3), 1107.
Vanhellemont, F., Fussen, D., Bingen, C.: 2002, Cosmic rays and stratospheric aerosols: Evidence for a connection? Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(15).
Vourlidas, A., Lynch, B.J., Howard, R.A., Li, Y.: 2013, How many CMEs have flux ropes? Deciphering the signatures of shocks, flux ropes, and prominences in coronagraph observations of CMEs. Solar Phys. 284(1), 179.
Wibberenz, G., Le Roux, J., Potgieter, M., Bieber, J.: 1998, Transient effects and disturbed conditions. In: Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere, Springer, Berlin, 309.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the NMDB database ( http://www.nmdb.eu ) founded under the European Union’s FP7 programme (contract no. 213007). We are also thankful to all neutron monitor observatories listed on the website. We are grateful to the CDAWeb and ACE science center for making interplanetary data available. We are grateful to the Department of Physics (Autonomous), University of Mumbai, for providing us facilities for the completion of this work. The authors would also like to thank S. Kasthurirangan for valuable discussions. The authors particularly thank Matthew Owens for suggesting improvements in the manuscript. The authors thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments that helped us to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raghav, A., Shaikh, Z., Bhaskar, A. et al. Forbush Decrease: A New Perspective with Classification. Sol Phys 292, 99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1121-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1121-4