Skip to main content
Log in

Forbush Decrease: A New Perspective with Classification

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sudden short-duration decreases in cosmic ray flux, known as Forbush decreases (FDs), are mainly caused by interplanetary disturbances. A generally accepted view is that the first step of an FD is caused by a shock sheath and the second step is due to the magnetic cloud (MC) of the interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME). This simplistic picture does not consider several physical aspects, such as whether the complete shock sheath or MC (or only part of these) contributes to the decrease or the effect of internal structure within the shock-sheath region or MC. We present an analysis of 16 large (\({\geq}\,8 \%\)) FD events and the associated ICMEs, a majority of which show multiple steps in the FD profile. We propose a reclassification of FD events according to the number of steps observed in their respective profiles and according to the physical origin of these steps. This study determines that 13 out of 16 major events (\({\sim}\,81\%\)) can be explained completely or partially on the basis of the classic FD model. However, it cannot explain all the steps observed in these events. Our analysis clearly indicates that not only broad regions (shock sheath and MC), but also localized structures within the shock sheath and MC have a significant role in influencing the FD profile. The detailed analysis in the present work is expected to contribute toward a better understanding of the relationship between FD and ICME parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arunbabu, K., Antia, H., Dugad, S., Gupta, S., Hayashi, Y., Kawakami, S., Mohanty, P., Nonaka, T., Oshima, A., Subramanian, P.: 2013, High-rigidity Forbush decreases: Due to CMEs or shocks? Astron. Astrophys. 555, A139.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Badruddin: 2002a, Shock orientations, magnetic turbulence and Forbush decreases. Solar Phys. 209(1), 195.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Badruddin: 2002b, Transient modulation of cosmic ray intensity: Role of magnetic clouds and turbulent interaction regions. Astrophys. Space Sci. 281(3), 651.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnden, L.: 1973, The large-scale magnetic field configuration associated with Forbush decreases. In: International Cosmic Ray Conference 2, 1277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belov, A.: 2008, Forbush effects and their connection with solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic phenomena. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 4(S257), 439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belov, A., Eroshenko, E., Oleneva, V., Struminsky, A., Yanke, V.: 2001, What determines the magnitude of Forbush decreases? Adv. Space Res. 27(3), 625.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Belov, A., Abunin, A., Abunina, M., Eroshenko, E., Oleneva, V., Yanke, V., Papaioannou, A., Mavromichalaki, H., Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S.: 2014, Coronal mass ejections and non-recurrent Forbush decreases. Solar Phys. 289(10), 3949.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, A., Subramanian, P., Vichare, G.: 2016, Relative contribution of the magnetic field barrier and solar wind speed in ICME-associated Forbush decreases. Astrophys. J. 828(2), 104.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, A., Vichare, G., Arunbabu, K., Raghav, A.: 2016, Role of solar wind speed and interplanetary magnetic field during two-step Forbush decreases caused by interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. Space Sci. 361(7), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, A., Ramesh, D.S., Vichare, G., Koganti, T., Gurubaran, S.: 2017, Quantitative assessment of drivers of recent global temperature variability: An information theoretic approach. Clim. Dyn., 1.

  • Candia, J., Roulet, E.: 2004, Diffusion and drift of cosmic rays in highly turbulent magnetic fields. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2004(10), 007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane, H.V.: 2000, Coronal mass ejections and Forbush decreases. Space Sci. Rev. 93(1 – 2), 55.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumbović, M., Vršnak, B., Čalogović, J., Karlica, M.: 2011, Cosmic ray modulation by solar wind disturbances. Astron. Astrophys. 531, A91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumbović, M., Vršnak, B., Čalogović, J., Župan, R.: 2012, Cosmic ray modulation by different types of solar wind disturbances. Astron. Astrophys. 538, A28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, J., Jokipii, J.: 1999, The transport of cosmic rays across a turbulent magnetic field. Astrophys. J. 520(1), 204.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, V.F., Demmelmair, A.: 1937, World-wide effect in cosmic ray intensity as observed during a recent magnetic storm. Nature 140, 316.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., Spence, H.E., Blake, J., Shaul, D.: 2011, Revisiting two-step Forbush decreases. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 116(A11).

  • Khabarova, O.V., Zank, G.P., Li, G., Malandraki, O.E., le Roux, J.A., Webb, G.M.: 2016, Small-scale magnetic islands in the solar wind and their role in particle acceleration. II. Particle energization inside magnetically confined cavities. Astrophys. J. 827(2), 122.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Khabarova, O., Zank, G., Li, G., le Roux, J., Webb, G., Dosch, A., Malandraki, O.: 2015, Small-scale magnetic islands in the solar wind and their role in particle acceleration. I. dynamics of magnetic islands near the heliospheric current sheet. Astrophys. J. 808(2), 181.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, A., Malandraki, O., Belov, A., Skoug, R., Mavromichalaki, H., Eroshenko, E., Abunin, A., Lepri, S.: 2010, On the analysis of the complex Forbush decreases of January 2005. Solar Phys. 266(1), 181.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Potgieter, M.S.: 2013, Solar modulation of cosmic rays. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 10(1), 1.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raghav, A., Bhaskar, A., Lotekar, A., Vichare, G., Yadav, V.: 2014, Quantitative understanding of Forbush decrease drivers based on shock-only and CME-only models using global signature of February 14, 1978 event. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014(10), 074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, I., Cane, H.: 2010, Near-Earth interplanetary coronal mass ejections during solar cycle 23 (1996 – 2009): Catalog and summary of properties. Solar Phys. 264(1), 189.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, I., Cane, H.: 2011, Galactic cosmic ray intensity response to interplanetary coronal mass ejections/magnetic clouds in 1995 – 2009. Solar Phys. 270(2), 609.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, I., Wibberenz, G., Cane, H.: 1996, The relationship between recurring cosmic ray depressions and corotating solar wind streams at \({\leq}\,1~\mbox{AU}\): IMP 8 and Helios 1 and 2 anticoincidence guard rate observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 101(A6), 13483.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, Z., Raghav, A., Bhaskar, A.: 2016, Presence of turbulent and ordered local structure within ICME shock-sheath and its contribution in Forbush decrease. Astrophys. J. Accepted. arXiv .

  • Subramanian, P., Antia, H., Dugad, S., Goswami, U., Gupta, S., Hayashi, Y., Ito, N., Kawakami, S., Kojima, H., Mohanty, P., et al.: 2009, Forbush decreases and turbulence levels at coronal mass ejection fronts. Astron. Astrophys. 494(3), 1107.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhellemont, F., Fussen, D., Bingen, C.: 2002, Cosmic rays and stratospheric aerosols: Evidence for a connection? Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(15).

  • Vourlidas, A., Lynch, B.J., Howard, R.A., Li, Y.: 2013, How many CMEs have flux ropes? Deciphering the signatures of shocks, flux ropes, and prominences in coronagraph observations of CMEs. Solar Phys. 284(1), 179.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wibberenz, G., Le Roux, J., Potgieter, M., Bieber, J.: 1998, Transient effects and disturbed conditions. In: Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere, Springer, Berlin, 309.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the NMDB database ( http://www.nmdb.eu ) founded under the European Union’s FP7 programme (contract no. 213007). We are also thankful to all neutron monitor observatories listed on the website. We are grateful to the CDAWeb and ACE science center for making interplanetary data available. We are grateful to the Department of Physics (Autonomous), University of Mumbai, for providing us facilities for the completion of this work. The authors would also like to thank S. Kasthurirangan for valuable discussions. The authors particularly thank Matthew Owens for suggesting improvements in the manuscript. The authors thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments that helped us to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Raghav.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 1.3 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raghav, A., Shaikh, Z., Bhaskar, A. et al. Forbush Decrease: A New Perspective with Classification. Sol Phys 292, 99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1121-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1121-4

Keywords

Navigation