Abstract
The linear relationship between the maximum amplitudes (R max) of sunspot cycles and preceding minima (R min) is one of the precursor methods used to predict the amplitude of the upcoming solar cycle. In the recent past this method has been subjected to severe criticism. In this communication we show that this simple method is reliable and can profitably be used for prediction purposes. With the 13-month smoothed R min of 1.8 at the beginning, it is predicted that the R max of the ongoing cycle will be around 85±17, suggesting that Cycle 24 may be of moderate strength. Based on a second-order polynomial dependence between the rise time (T R) and R max, it is predicted that Cycle 24 will reach its smoothed maximum amplitude during the third quarter of the year 2013. An important finding of this paper is that the rise time cycle amplitude relation reaches a minimum at about 3 to 3.5 years, corresponding to a cycle amplitude of about 160. The Waldmeier effect breaks down at this point and T R increases further with increasing R max. This feature, we believe, may put a constraint on the flux transport dynamo models and lead to more accurate physical principles-based predictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahluwalia, H.S.: 2000, Solar cycle 23 prediction update. Adv. Space Res. 26, 187 – 192.
Ahluwalia, H.S., Ygbuhay, R.C.: 2010, Current forecast for sunspot cycle 24 parameters. In: AIP conf. Proc. 12th Solar Wind Conf., 671 – 674. doi: 10.1063/1.3395956 .
Brajša, R., Wöhl, H., Hanslmeier, A., Verbanac, G., Ruždjak, D., Cliver, E., Svalgaard, L., Roth, M.: 2009, On solar cycle predictions and reconstructions. Astron. Astrophys. 496, 855 – 861.
Brown, G.M.: 1976, What determines sunspot maximum. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 174, 185 – 189.
Cameron, R., Schüssler, M.: 2008, A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles: consequences for prediction methods. Astrophys. J. 685, 1291 – 1296.
Choudhuri, A.R., Chatterjee, P., Jiang, J.: 2007, Predicting solar cycle 24 with a solar dynamo model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 131103.
Dikpati, M., Gilman, P.A.: 2006, Simulating and predicting solar cycles using a flux-transport dynamo. Astrophys. J. 649, 498 – 514.
Dikpati, M., Gilman, P.A., de Toma, G.: 2008, The Waldmeier effect: an artifact of the definition of Wolf sunspot number? Astrophys. J. 673, 99 – 101.
Du, Z.: 2011, The relationship between prediction accuracy and correlation coefficient. Solar Phys. 270, 407 – 416.
Du, Z.L., Wang, H.N.: 2010, Does a low solar cycle minimum hint at a weak upcoming cycle? Res. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 950 – 955.
Du, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, L.: 2009a, Correlation function analysis between sunspot cycle amplitudes and rise times. Solar Phys. 255, 179 – 185.
Du, Z.L., Li, R., Wang, H.N.: 2009b, The predictive power of Ohl’s precursor method. Astron. J. 138, 1998 – 2001.
Harvey, K.L., White, O.R.: 1999, What is solar cycle minimum? J. Geophys. Res. 104, 19759 – 19764.
Hathaway, D.H.: 2010, The solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 7, 1 – 65.
Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., Reichmann, E.J.: 1994, The shape of the sunspot cycle. Solar Phys. 151, 177 – 190.
Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., Reichmann, E.J.: 2002, Group sunspot numbers: sunspot cycle characteristics. Solar Phys. 211, 357 – 370.
Javaraiah, J.: 2007, North-south asymmetry in solar activity: predicting the amplitude of the next solar cycle. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 377, 34 – 38.
Kakad, B.: 2011, A new method for prediction of peak sunspot number and ascent time of the solar cycle. Solar Phys. 270, 393 – 406.
Kane, R.P.: 1997, A preliminary estimate of the size of the coming solar cycle 23, based on Ohl’s precursor method. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 1899 – 1902.
Karak, B.B., Choudhuri, A.R.: 2010, The Waldmeier effect in sunspot cycles. In: Hasan, S.S., Rutten, R.J. (eds.) Magnetic Coupling Between the Interior and Atmosphere of the Sun, 402 – 404. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02859-5-40 .
Karak, B.B., Choudhuri, A.R.: 2011, The Waldmeier effect and the flux transport solar dynamo. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 410, 1503 – 1512.
Kennedy, J.B., Neville, A.M.: 1964, Basic Statistical Methods for Engineers and Scientists, Dun-Donnelley, New York, 180.
Lantos, P.: 2000, Prediction of the maximum amplitude of solar cycles using the ascending inflexion point. Solar Phys. 196, 221 – 225.
McKinnon, J.A.: 1987, Sunspot numbers, 1610 – 1985: based on “The sunspot activity in the years 1610 – 1960, by Prof. M. Waldmeier”, Report UAG, 0579-7144; 95. World Data Center A for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Boulder, Colorado.
Pesnell, W.D.: 2008, Predictions of solar cycle 24. Solar Phys. 252, 209 – 220.
Petrovay, K.: 2010, Solar cycle prediction. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 1, 6 – 59.
Ramesh, K.B.: 2000, Dependence of SSN M on SSN m – a reconsideration for predicting the amplitude of a sunspot cycle. Solar Phys. 197, 421 – 424.
Schatten, K.: 2005, Fair space weather for solar cycle 24. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 21106. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024363 .
Schatten, K.H., Scherrer, P.H., Svalgaard, L., Wilcox, J.M.: 1978, Using dynamo theory to predict the sunspot number during solar cycle 21. Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 411 – 414.
Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Schüssler, M., Fligge, M.: 2002, Search for a relationship between solar cycle amplitude and length. Astron. Astrophys. 396, 1029 – 1035.
Svalgaard, L., Cliver, E.W., Kamide, Y.: 2005, Sunspot cycle 24: smallest cycle in 100 years? Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 01104. doi: 10.1029/2005GL021664 .
Waldmeier, M.: 1935, Neue Eigenschaften der Sonnenfleckenkurve. Astron. Mitt. 14, 105 – 130.
Wang, Y.M., Sheeley, N.R.J.: 2009, Understanding the geomagnetic precursor of the solar cycle. Astrophys. J. 694, 11 – 15.
Wilson, R.M., Hathaway, D.H., Reichmann, E.J.: 1998, An estimate for the size of cycle 23 based on near minimum conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 6595 – 6603.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramesh, K.B., Lakshmi, N.B. The Amplitude of Sunspot Minimum as a Favorable Precursor for the Prediction of the Amplitude of the Next Solar Maximum and the Limit of the Waldmeier Effect. Sol Phys 276, 395–406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9866-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9866-7