Skip to main content
Log in

Similarities and Differences between Coronal Holes and the Quiet Sun: Are Loop Statistics the Key?

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coronal holes (CH) emit significantly less at coronal temperatures than quiet-Sun regions (QS), but can hardly be distinguished in most chromospheric and lower transition region lines. A key quantity for the understanding of this phenomenon is the magnetic field. We use data from SOHO/MDI to reconstruct the magnetic field in coronal holes and the quiet Sun with the help of a potential magnetic model. Starting from a regular grid on the solar surface we then trace field lines, which provide the overall geometry of the 3D magnetic field structure. We distinguish between open and closed field lines, with the closed field lines being assumed to represent magnetic loops. We then try to compute some properties of coronal loops. The loops in the coronal holes (CH) are found to be on average flatter than in the QS. High and long closed loops are extremely rare, whereas short and low-lying loops are almost as abundant in coronal holes as in the quiet Sun. When interpreted in the light of loop scaling laws this result suggests an explanation for the relatively strong chromospheric and transition region emission (many low-lying, short loops), but the weak coronal emission (few high and long loops) in coronal holes. In spite of this contrast our calculations also suggest that a significant fraction of the cool emission in CHs comes from the open flux regions. Despite these insights provided by the magnetic field line statistics further work is needed to obtain a definite answer to the question if loop statistics explain the differences between coronal holes and the quiet Sun.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschuler, M. D., Trotter, D. E., and Orrall, F. Q.: 1972, Solar Phys. 26, 354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aly, J. J.: 1989, Solar Phys. 120, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschwanden, M. J., Nightingale, R. W., and Alexander, D.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 541, 1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenko, I. A.: 2001, Solar Phys. 199, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin, J. D. and Sheeley, N. R. Jr.: 1978, Solar Phys. 56, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brkovic, A., Landi, E., Landini, M., Rüedi, I., and Solanki, S. K.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 383, 661.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeForest, C. E., Hoeksema, J. T., Gurman, J. B., Thompson, B. J., Plunkett, S. P., Howard, R., Harrison, R. C., and Hassler, D. M.: 1997, Solar Phys. 175, 393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy, J. F., Jr., Rabin, D., and Moore, R. L.: 1986, Solar Phys. 105, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, U.: 1998, Astrophys. J. 507, 974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, U., Dammasch, I. E., and Wilhelm, K.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 558, 423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, A. H.: 1976, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 281, 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, L., Herant, M., Kalata, K., Lovas, I., Nystrom, G., Pardo, F., Spiller, E., and Wilczynski, J.: 1990, Nature 344, 842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. W., Krieger, A. S., Timothy, A. F., and Vaiana, G. S.: 1975, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 7, 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, K. L. and Recely, F.: 2001, Coronal hole maps prepared at NSO/Kitt Peak by Karen Harvey and Frank Recely as part of an NSF grant. (http://nsokp.nso.edu/dataarch.html).

  • Harvey, K. L., Sheeley, J. R., and Harvey, J. W.: 1982, Solar Phys. 79, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, R. and Tsuneta, S.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 454, 934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, R. and Tsuneta, S.: 1996, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 48, 535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krivova, N. A. and Solanki, S. K.: 2004, Astron. Astrophys. 417, 1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, M. R., White, S. M., Shibasaki, K., and Raulin, J.-P.: 2001, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 133, 467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagg, A., Woch, J., Krupp, N., and Solanki, S. K.: 2004, Astron. Astrophys. 414, 1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. H.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 218, 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., Penn, M. J., and Kuhn, J. R.: 1998, Astrophys. J. 493, 978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxson, C. W. and Vaiana, G. S.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 215, 991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsch, E., Fleck, B., and Schwenn, R.: 2001, in Klaus Scherer, Horst Fichtner, Hans Jörg Fahr, and Eckart Marsch COSPAR Colloquia Series (eds)., The Outer Heliosphere: The Next Frontiers, 11, Pergamon Press, Amsterdam, p. 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsch, E. E. et al.: 2002, Adv. Space Res. 29, 2027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raouafi, N.-E., Sahal-Bréchot, S., and Lemaire, P.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 396, 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R., Tucker, W. H., and Vaiana, G. S.:1978, Astrophys. J. 220, 643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, P. H., Bogart, R. S., Bush, R. I., Hoeksema, J. T., Kosovichev, A. G., Schou, J., Rosenberg, W., Springer, L., Tarbell, T. D., Title, A., Wolfson, C. J., Zayer, I., and MDI Engineering Team: 1995, Solar Phys. 162, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. U.: 1964, in W. N. Ness (ed)., ASS-NASA Symposium on the Physics of Solar Flares, NASA SP-50, p. 107.

  • Semel, M.: 1967, Ann. Astrophys. 30, 513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serio, S., Peres, G., Vaiana, G. S., Golub, L., and Rosner, R.:1981, Astrophys. J. 243, 288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solanki, S. K., Lagg, A., Woch, J., Krupp, N., and Collados, M.: 2003, Nature 425, 692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucki, K., Solanki, S. K., Schühle, U., Rüedi, I., Wilhelm, K., Stenflo, J. O., Brkovic, A., and Huber, M. C. E.: 2000, Astron. Astrophys. 363, 1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucki, K., Solanki, S. K., Pike, C. D.; Schühle, U., Rüedi, I., Pauluhn, A., and Brkovic, A.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 381, 653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmeier, M.: 1957, Die Sonnenkorona (II). Birkhäuser Verlag Basel und Stuttgart.

  • Waldmeier, M.: 1975, Solar Phys. 40, 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. M.: 2002, Astron. Nachr. 323, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, K.: 2000, Astron. Astrophys. 360, 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, K., Dammasch, I. E., Marsch, E., and Hassler, D. M.: 2000, Astron. Astrophys. 353, 749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winebarger, A. R., Warren, H., van Ballegooijen, A., DeLuca, E. E., and Golub L. 2002, Astrophys. J. 567, L89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, L.: 2003, Equatorial Coronal Holes and Their Relation to the High-Speed Solar Wind Streams. PhD. Thesis Göttingen.

  • Zhang, J., Woch, J., Solanki, S. K., and von Steiger, R.: 2002, Geophys. Res. Let. 29, pp. 77–1, CiteID 1236, DOI 10.1029/2001GL014471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Woch, J., Solanki, S. K., von Steiger, R., and Forsyth, R.: 2003,J. Geophys. Res. 108, pp. SSH 1-1, CiteID 1144, DOI 10.1029/2002JA009538.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Wiegelmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiegelmann, T., Solanki, S.K. Similarities and Differences between Coronal Holes and the Quiet Sun: Are Loop Statistics the Key?. Sol Phys 225, 227–247 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-004-3747-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-004-3747-2

Keywords

Navigation