Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Evolution (or Devolution) of Privacy

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This paper explores changes in the meaning of privacy. Because individuals’ understandings and experiences of privacy vary by sociohistorical contexts, privacy is difficult to define and even more challenging to measure. Avoiding common obstacles to privacy research, I examine privacy from the standpoint of its invasion. I develop a typology of privacy invasions and use it to analyze discussions of invasions of privacy in U.S. newspapers. I show that the nature of invasions discussed in the news is increasingly covert and continuous and find empirical support for the often-made claim that the concept of privacy is evolving in meaningful ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benn, S. I., and G. F. Gaus (eds.) 1983 Public and Private in Social Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandeis, Louis 1995 Brandeis on Democracy. Ed. Phillipa Strum. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton, Myron 1964 The Privacy Invaders. New York: Coward-McCann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai 1999 The Limits of Privacy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcelon, Marc 1997 “The shadow of the Leviathan: Public and private in communist and post-communist society.” In Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar (eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: 303–332. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FTC 2004 Out of area’ no longer: Telemarketers must start identifying themselves on caller id. Associated Press, January 29.

  • Glenn, Richard A. 2003 The Right to Privacy: Rights and Liberties under the Law. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, David 2003 “‘Do-Not-Call’ Still a Big Hit.” CBSNEWS.com. July 1.

  • Inness, Julie C. 1992 Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto 1990 “Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty.” Political Behavior 12:19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder 1987 News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Donald L. 1993 “Newspaper effects on policy preferences.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57:191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslyn, Mark R., and Steve Ceccoli 1996 “Attentiveness to television news and opinion change in the fall 1992 presidential campaign.” Political Behavior 18:141–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987 Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcella, Albert J., and Carol Stucki 2003 Guidelines, Exposures, Policy Implementation, and International Issues. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, Maxwell, Edna Einsiedel, and David Weaver 1991 Contemporary Public Opinion: Issues and News. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • McLean, Deckle 1995 Privacy and Its Invasion. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Barrington, Jr. 1984 Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History. Armonk, NJ: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Dean E. 2002 “As Security Cameras Sprout, Someone’s Always Watching.” New York Times. September 29.

  • Mutz, Diana C., and Joe Soss 1997 “Reading public opinion: The influence of news coverage on perceptions of public sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61:431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, Steven L. 1993 The Costs of Privacy: Surveillance and Reputation in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1998 “Too much privacy?” Journal of Family Issues 19:101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Jeffrey 2000 The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeman, Ferdinand 1992 Privacy and Social Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael 1995 The Power of News. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2003 The Sociology of News. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Robert Ellis 1979 Privacy: How to Protect What’s Left of It. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanks to the Readership Institute 2004 Newspaper readership steady in US top 50 markets. www.editorsweblog. org/2004

  • The Lieutenant’s Right 1988 Washington Post. September 6.

  • Westin, Alan F. 1967 Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongdang, Pan, and Gerald M. Kosicki 1994 “Voters” reasoning processes and media influences during the Persian Gulf War.” Political Behavior 16:117–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie V. S. Kasper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kasper, D.V.S. The Evolution (or Devolution) of Privacy. Sociol Forum 20, 69–92 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-005-1898-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-005-1898-z

Keywords

Navigation