Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Construction of an Asset Index at Household Level and Measurement of Economic Disparities in Punjab (Pakistan) by using MICS-Micro Data

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objectives of this study are to construct a valid and reliable asset index at household level and to estimate economic disparities in 36 districts of Punjab (Pakistan) by using Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey micro-data. An asset index may be a better measure than current income or expenditure for gauging a household’s long-term capacity for buying goods and services and its potential resilience to economic shocks. This paper provides details of the results from Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Tetrachoric Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for the dimensional structure of assets. We have applied Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) in order to construct a reliable household level asset index. In Punjab, Lahore has the highest asset index score followed by Gujrat and Sialkot. Gini-coefficient index and the Palma ratio analyses show that the asset distribution in the district of Rajanpur is highly unequal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This paper is part of the PhD project “Measurement and determinants of human development disparities at household level in Punjab (Pakistan)” of the corresponding author.

  2. www.poverty.ac.uk.

  3. For details on sampling, see https://mics-surveys-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/MICS5/South%20Asia/Pakistan%20%28Punjab%29/2014/Final/Pakistan%20%28Punjab%29%202014%20MICS_English.pdf.

  4. \(= ci + \left( {1 - ci} \right){ }\frac{{e^{{a_{i} \left( {{\uptheta } - b_{i} } \right)}} }}{{1 + e^{{a_{i} \left( {{\uptheta } - b_{i} } \right)}} }} \ldots \ldots \ldots \ldots \ldots \left( {\text{IRT Model }} \right)\)

References

  • Adato, M., Carter, M. R., & May, J. (2006). Exploring poverty traps and social exclusion in South Africa using qualitative and quantitative data. Journal of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500405345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M., & Filmer, D. (2006). Inequalities in children’s schooling: AIDS, orphanhood, poverty, and gender. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altimir, O. (1979). La dimensión de la pobreza en América Latina. Santiago de Chile, Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., & Segal, P. (2017). Who are the global top 1%? World Development, 95, 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, L., Minujin, A. (1985). Altenative methods for measuring the evolution of poverty. Proceedings of 45th. Session, Invites papers, International Statistcs Institute, Amsterdam.

  • Bellù, L. G., & Liberati, P. (2011). Charting Income Inequality: The Lorenz Curve. MPRA Paper No. 30063. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30063/

  • Bicego, G., Rutstein, S., & Johnson, K. (2003). Dimensions of the emerging orphan crisis in sub-Saharan Africa. Social Science and Medicine, 56(6), 1235–1247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., Glanville, J. L., & Stecklov, G. (2002). Economic status proxies in studies of fertility in developing countries: Does the measure matter? Population Studies, 56(1), 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappellari, L., & Jenkins, S. P. (2007). Summarizing multiple deprivation indicators. In S. P. Jenkins & J. Micklewright (Eds.), Inequality and poverty: Re-examined (pp. 166–184). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. R., & May, J. (2001). One kind of freedom: Poverty dynamics in post-apartheid South Africa. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00089-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalán, H. E. N. (2019). Reliability, population classification and weighting in multidimensional poverty measurement: A Monte Carlo study. Social indicators research, 142(3), 887–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2001). How did the world’s poorest fare in the 1990s? Review of Income and wealth, 47(3), 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobham, A., & Sumner, A. (2013). Is it all about the tails? The Palma measure of income inequality. Center for Global Development Working Paper 343. Washington.

  • Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D. F., & Venaik, S. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1250–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermott, E. and Main, G. (Eds) Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK Volume 1 - The Nature and Extent of the Problem. Bristol, Policy Press.

  • Dargent-Molina, P., James, S., Strpoatz, D., & Savitz, D. (1994). Association between maternal education and infant diarrhoea in different household and communityenvironments. Social Science and Medicine, 38(2), 343–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Maio, F. G. (2007). Income inequality measures. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(10), 849–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, P. (2000). Social ties and foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 443–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Multivariate applications books series. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkingham, J., & Namazie, C. (2002). Measuring health and poverty: A review of approaches to identifying the poor. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F. H. G., & Lugo, M. A. (2013). Multidimensional poverty analysis: Looking for a middle ground. The World Bank Research Observer, 28(2), 220–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D., & Scott, K. (2008). Assessing asset indices. USA: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosu, A. K. (2017). Growth, inequality, and poverty reduction in developing countries: Recent global evidence. Research in Economics, 71(2), 306–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. USA: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusco, A., & Dickes, P. (2008). The Rasch model and multidimensional poverty measurement. In Nanak Kakwani & Jacques Silber (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement (pp. 49–62). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusco, A., Guio, A.-C., & Marlier, E. (2013). Building a material deprivation index in a multinational context: lessons from the EU experience. In Valerie Berenger & Florent Bresson (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion around the Mediterranean Sea (pp. 43–71). Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedek, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences San Francisco. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoP. . (2014). Pakistan economic survey. Pakistan Economic Survey. https://doi.org/10.1038/479299e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (2000). The scientific measurement of poverty: Recent theoretical advances. In J. Bradshaw (Ed.), Researching poverty (pp. 37–58). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Howe, L. D., Galobardes, B., Matijasevich, A., Johnston, D., Onwujekwe, O., et al. (2012). Response to: Alternatives to principal components analysis to derive asset-based indices to measure socio-economic position in low- and middle-income countries: the case for multiple correspondence analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology., 41(4), 1209–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., & Nájera, H. (2019). Reply to santos and colleagues ‘The importance of reliability in the multidimensional poverty index for Latin America (MPI-LA).’ The Journal of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1663178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Nandy, S., Pantazis, C., Townsend, P., & Pemberton, S. (2003). Child poverty in the developing world: Policy Press.

  • Gordon, D., & Spicker, P. (Eds.). (1999). The International glossary on poverty. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., & Townsend, P. (2000). Measuring absolute and overall poverty (pp. 49–78). Breadline Europe: The measurement of poverty, Bristol, Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A.-C., Gordon, D. Catalan., HN & Pomati, M, . (2017). Revising the EU material deprivation variables. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A.-C., Gordon, D., & Marlier, E. (2012). Measuring material deprivation in the EU: Indicators for the whole population and child-specific indicators. Luxembourg, EU: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A. C., Gordon, D., Marlier, E., Catalan, H. N., & Pomati, M. (2018). Towards an EU measure of child deprivation. Child Indicators Research., 11(3), 835–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A.-C., Marlier, E., Gordon, D., Fahmy, E., Nandy, S., & Pomati, M. (2016). Improving the measurement of material deprivation at the European union level. Journal of European social policy, 26(3), 219–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, S., & Solon, G. J. A. E. R. (2006). Life-cycle variation in the association between current and lifetime earnings., 96(4), 1308–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harttgen, K., & Klasen, S. (2012). A household-based human development index. World Development, 40(5), 878–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harttgen, K., & Vollmer, S. (2011). Inequality decomposition without income or expenditure data: Using an asset index to simulate household income: Citeseer.

  • Howe, L. D., Galobardes, B., Matijasevich, A., Gordon, D., Johnston, D., Onwujekwe, O., et al. (2012). Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low-and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(3), 871–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, L. D., Hargreaves, J. R., & Huttly, S. R. A. (2008). Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countries. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. (1996). The fertility impact of alternative family planning distribution channels in Indonesia. Demography, 33(2), 153–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2014). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 473–503). UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolenikov, S., & Angeles, G. (2009). Socioeconomic status measurement with discrete proxy variables: Is principal component analysis a reliable answer? Review of Income and Wealth, 55(1), 128–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimi, M. S., Yusop, Z., & Hook, L. S. (2010). Regional development disparities in Malaysia. Journal of American Science, 6(3), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labonne, J., Biller, D. & Chase, R. (2007). Inequality and relative wealth: do they matter for trust? Evidence from Poor Communities in the Philippines. World Bank-Social Development Papers, (103).

  • Lau, M. and Gordon. D. (Eds) Poverty in a Rich Society. Hong Kong, The Chinese University Press

  • Lusardi, A. (1996). Permanent income, current income, and consumption: Evidence from two panel data sets. Journal of Business Economic Statistics, 14(1), 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 229–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2013). The inequality possibility frontier: extensions and new applications: The World Bank.

  • Minujin, A., & Bang, J. H. (2002). Indicadores de inequidad social. Acerca del uso del indice de bienes para la distribucion de los hogares. Desarrollo Económico, 42(165), 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C., & Felton, A. (2007). Intergenerational asset accumulation and poverty reduction in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Reducing global poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (2003). PDQ statistics. PMPH-USA: Decker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Growing unequal ? Paris, OECD: Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Divided we stand – why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. G. (2006). Globalizing Inequality:’Centrifugal’and’Centripetal’Forces at Work. UN.

  • Palma, J. G. (2011). Homogeneous middles vs heterogeneous tails, and the end of the inverted-U It’s all about the share of the rich. Development and Change, 42(1), 87–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. G. (2011). Why has productivity growth stagnated in most Latin American countries since the neo-liberal reforms? . Cambridge working papers in economics (CWPE) 1030 Cambridge University. Retrieved from http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/dae/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe1030.pdf

  • Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., & Levitas, R. (Eds.). (2006). Poverty and social exclusion in britain. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (2001). Where has all the education gone? The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 367–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskall, P., & Matheson, G. (1992). Understanding the gini coefficient (p. 6). Newsletter: Social Policy Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (1992). Poverty comparisons: A guide to concepts and methods: The World Bank.

  • Rio Group (United Nations Expert Group on Poverty Statistics) (2006) Compendium of Best Practice in Poverty Measurement. Rio de Janeiro & Santiago, Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE), with the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

  • Rusch, T., Lowry, P. B., Mair, P., & Treiblmaier, H. (2017). Breaking free from the limitations of classical test theory: Developing and measuring information systems scales using item response theory. Information and Management, 54(2), 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahn, D. E., & Stifel, D. (2003). Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(4), 463–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, N. (2004). Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in developing countries: The case of child survival in Sao Paulo Brazil. Demography, 41(3), 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, J. A., Victora, C. G., Mushi, A., De Savigny, D., Schellenberg, D., Mshinda, H., & Bryce, J. (2003). Inequities among the very poor: Health care for children in rural southern Tanzania. Lancet, 361(9357), 561–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973). Poverty, inequality and unemployment: Some conceptual issues in measurement. Economic and Political Weekly, 8(33), 1457–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, J., & Steendijk, R. (2015). The international wealth index (IWI). Social indicators research, 122(1), 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. & Simelane, S. (2005). Are assets a valid proxy for income? an analysis of socioeconomic status and child mortality in South Africa. Unpublished Document.

  • Economic Survey of Pakistan, 2016–17 2017 Pakistan economic survey Pakistan Economic Survey https://doi.org/10.1038/479299e.

  • Szeles, M. R., & Fusco, A. (2013). Item response theory and the measurement of deprivation: evidence from Luxembourg data. Quality and Quantity, 47(3), 1545–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarozzi, A. & Mahajan, A. (2005). Child Nutrition in India in the Nineties: A story of increased gender inequality? Available at SSRN 730526.

  • United Nations. (2003). Human development report 2003: millennium development goals: A compact among nations to end human poverty. New York, USA: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). Inequality Measurement: Development Issues No. 2. United Nations.

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Human development report 2014. UN Development Programme.

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2020) Poverty measurement: Guide to data disaggregation. Geneva, UN.

  • Vollmer, F. & Alkire, S. (2018). Towards a global asset indicator: re-assessing the asset indicator in the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index. OPHI Research in Progress 53a, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford, 3.

  • Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21(6), 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2015). World development indicators 2015. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7386-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2017). Monitoring Global poverty: Report of the commission on global poverty. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2014). Global Risks 2014. Continuity Central. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan

    Tanveer Ahmed Naveed & Sami Ullah

  2. School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

    Tanveer Ahmed Naveed, David Gordon & Mary Zhang

Authors
  1. Tanveer Ahmed Naveed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sami Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mary Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanveer Ahmed Naveed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naveed, T.A., Gordon, D., Ullah, S. et al. The Construction of an Asset Index at Household Level and Measurement of Economic Disparities in Punjab (Pakistan) by using MICS-Micro Data. Soc Indic Res 155, 73–95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02594-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02594-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Search

Navigation