Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Odd Ladder to Climb: Socioeconomic Differences Across Levels of Subjective Social Status

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subjective social status (SSS), a promising measure of social class or standing, is linked robustly to diverse indicators of mental and physical well-being. However, the processes behind SSS remain poorly understood. Socioeconomic status (SES; e.g., education, income, or occupation) is among the strongest predictors of SSS, but when and how much does SES matter for understanding differences between given SSS ranks? Drawing on multiple years of national US data (2010–2014 General Social Survey), I show that a quartic form closely describes relationships between SSS and SES: namely, education, income and occupational attainment increase at the bottom of the SSS ladder (between rungs 1–2 and 3) and before the top (between rungs 5–8), increase more modestly (“plateau”) across other ranks, and decrease markedly at the very top (across rungs 9–10). Auxiliary data on wealth accumulation among older Americans (2005 National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States; MIDUS) replicate the quartic form for education and occupation while also suggesting that high personal net worth (e.g., millionaire status) may help to explain why individuals assign themselves to the very top of the ladder despite holding less education, income or occupational prestige relative to others who rank just below. Additional multinomial analyses showed how probabilities of occupying specific rungs of the SSS ladder shift across levels of SES, confirming that the very top of the ladder is more responsive to gains in personal net worth than to traditional SES measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N., Singh-Manoux, A., Schwartz, J., Stewart, J., Matthews, K., & Marmot, M. G. (2008). Social status and health: A comparison of British civil servants in whitehall-II with European- and African-Americans in CARDIA. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1034–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. A. (2015). How do we assign ourselves social status? A cross-cultural test of the cognitive averaging principle. Social Science Research, 52, 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloome, D. (2015). Income inequality and intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Social Forces, 93, 1047–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demakakos, P., Nazroo, J., Breeze, E., & Marmot, M. (2008). Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective status. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 330–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, B. G., Rehkopf, D. H., & Rogers, R. G. (2013). The nonlinear relationship between education and mortality: An examination of cohort, race/ethnic, and gender differences. Population Research and Policy Review, 32, 893–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzini, L., & Fernandez-Esquer, M. E. (2006). The association of subjective social status and health in low-income mexican-origin individuals in Texas. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 788–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaed, S. G., & Gallo, L. C. (2007). Subjective social status, objective socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular risk in women. Health Psychology, 26, 668–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, N., Cornman, J. C., & Chang, M.-C. (2006). Measuring subjective social status: A case study of older Taiwanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 21, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1143–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, K. (2016). Relative (dis)Advantage. Perspectives from the Right Tail. Conference paper, “Moral economies, economic moralities” (Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, SASE). Delivered at University of California—Berkeley, June 24, 2016.

  • Hu, P., Adler, N. E., Goldman, N., Weinstein, M., & Seeman, T. E. (2005). Relationship between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M. R., & Jackman, R. W. (1973). An interpretation of the relation between objective and subjective social status. American Sociological Review, 38, 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS, 107, 16489–16493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landefeld, J. C., Burmaster, K. B., Rehkopf, D. H., Leonard Syme, S., et al. (2014). The association between a living wage and subjective social status and self-rated health: A quasi-experimental study in the dominican republic. Social Science and Medicine, 121, 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., & Senter, R. (1976). Subjective social distance, occupational stratification, and forms of status and class consciousness: A cross-national replication and extension. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1304–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakao, K., & Treas, J. (1994). Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. Sociological Methodology, 24, 1–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Francois, Micah Roos, J., & Combs, R. M. (2015). Clues of subjective social status among young adults. Social Science Research, 52, 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobles, J., Weintraub, M. R., & Adler, N. E. (2013). Subjective socioeconomic status and health: Relationships considered. Social Science and Medicine, 82, 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Präg, P., Mills, M. C., & Wittek, R. (2016). Subjective socioeconomic status and health in cross-national comparison. Social Science and Medicine, 149, 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quon, E. C., & McGrath, J. J. (2014). Subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent health: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 33, 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radler, B. T., & Ryff, C. D. (2010). Who participates? Longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being. Journal of Aging and Health, 22, 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzel, L. R., Mazas, C. A., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Vidrine, J. I., Businelle, M. S., Kendzor, D. E., et al. (2010). Acculturative and neighborhood influences on subjective social status among Spanish-speaking Latino immigrant smokers. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 677–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. M., Al-Hamzawi, A. O., Andrade, L. H., Borges, G., et al. (2014). Associations between subjective social status and DSM-IV mental disorders. JAMA Psychiatry, 71, 1400–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the whitehall II study. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1321–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 855–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, I. (2016). Race, wealth, and class identification in twenty-first-century American Society. Sociological Quarterly, 57, 356–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1768–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, L. S., Subramanian, S. V., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Weber, D., & Kawachi, I. (2010). Compared to whom? Subjective social status, self-rated health, and referent group sensitivity in a diverse US sample. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 2019–2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97326, Waco, TX, USA

    Matthew A. Andersson

Authors
  1. Matthew A. Andersson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew A. Andersson.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and Figs. 5, 6, 7 and 8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andersson, M.A. An Odd Ladder to Climb: Socioeconomic Differences Across Levels of Subjective Social Status. Soc Indic Res 136, 621–643 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1559-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1559-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation