Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Poset Theory with Big Datasets: A New Proposal Applied to the Analysis of Life Satisfaction in Italy

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work is to propose a tool for measuring a complex concept, and to apply it to big sets of data measured on ordinal and/or dichotomous scales. An important field of application are subjective data, that are often based on opinions or personal evaluations. Many national and international surveys employ this kind of data, measured among thousand of individuals. Thanks to the use of the “average rank” as a synthetic measure of a complex concept, we believe that poset theory could be a very useful approach for dealing with ordinal data avoiding the use of scaling procedures. Because classic poset approaches are at their best when applied to few data at a time, our idea is based on a procedure for sampling units from a big population using a simple criterion to summarize the resulting values appropriately. Applying the central limit theorem enables a comparison of the results obtained from different groups using statistical tests on the means. We used our Height of Groups by Sampling (HOGS) method to compare the average rank among groups that are defined by one or more socio-demographic variables influencing the level of the complex concept we wish to measure. The application of the HOGS procedure to life satisfaction in Italy generated convincing results, revealing significant differences between regions, genders and levels of formal education. We compared the results given by HOGS with the non linear principal component analysis and obtain an easy readable output with convincing precision and accuracy; we are confident that the HOGS procedure can be applied to many other concepts investigated in the social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brüggemann, R., & Carlsen, L. (2011). An improved estimation of averaged ranks of partial orders. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 65, 383–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann, R., & Patil, G. P. (2011). Ranking and prioritization for multi-indicator systems (Vol. 5). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann, R., Sørensen, P. B., Lerche, D., & Carlsen, L. (2004). Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model#. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 44(2), 618–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann, R., & Voigt, K. (2009). Analysis of partial orders in environmental systems applying the new software pyhasse. In J. Wittmann, M. Flechsig (Eds.), Simulation in Umwelt-und Geowissenschaften, Workshop Potsdam (pp. 43–55), ShakerVerlag.

  • Caperna, G. (2016). Partial order theory for synthetic indicators. Ph.D. thesis, University of Padova.

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B. A., & Priestley, H. A. (2002). Introduction to lattices and order. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, J., & Mair, P. (2009). Gifi methods for optimal scaling in r: The package homals. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(4), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Loof, K. (2009). Efficient computation of rank probabilities in posets. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ghent.

  • De Loof, K., De Baets, B., & De Meyer, H. (2011). Approximation of average ranks in posets. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 66, 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattore, M. (2015). Partially ordered sets and the measurement of multidimensional ordinal deprivation. Social Indicators Research, 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1059-6.

  • Fattore, M., & Arcagni, A. (2014). Parsec: an r package for poset-based evaluation of multidimensional poverty. In R. Brüggeman, L. Carlsen & J. Wittmann (Eds.), Multi-indicator systems and modelling in partial order (pp. 317–330). New York: Springer.

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1978). A research approach to improving our quality of life. American Psychologist, 33(2), 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Chicester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. K., Jongman, A. J., & Schmid, A. P. (1994). Creating a composite index for assessing country performance in the field of human rights: Proposal for a new methodology. Human Rights Quarterly, 6(1), 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupinski, J. (1980). Health and quality of life. Social Science and Medicine Part A: Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, 14(3), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerche, D., & Sørensen, P. B. (2003). Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions. Chemosphere, 53(8), 981–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, N., Bagherzadeh, M., Araya-Castillo, L., Thieme, C., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2014). Life domain satisfactions as predictors of overall life satisfaction among workers: Evidence from chile. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggino, F., & Fattore, M. (2011). New tools for the construction of ranking and evaluation indicators in multidimensional systems of ordinal variables. In Proceedings of the: New techniques and technologies for statistics, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/sites/crosportal/files/S16P4.pdf-20/02/2016.

  • Maggino, F., & Nuvolati, G. (2012). Quality of life in Italy: Research and reflections (Vol. 48). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1920). Über den zentralen Grenzwertsatz der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und das Momentenproblem. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 8(3), 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, B. (2012). Ordered sets: An introduction. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2012). Happiness: Also known as life satisfaction and subjective well-being. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 63–77). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Cesare Battisti 241, 35121, Padua, Italy

    Giulio Caperna & Giovanna Boccuzzo

Authors
  1. Giulio Caperna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanna Boccuzzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio Caperna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caperna, G., Boccuzzo, G. Use of Poset Theory with Big Datasets: A New Proposal Applied to the Analysis of Life Satisfaction in Italy. Soc Indic Res 136, 1071–1088 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1482-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1482-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation