Abstract
A central question for education authorities has become “which factors make a territory attractive for tertiary students?” Tertiary education is recognised as one of the most important assets for the development of a territory, thus students’ mobility becomes a brain drain issue whenever there are prevalent areas that attract students from other territories. In this paper, we try to identify the most important factors that could affect student mobility in Italy. In doing that we analyse students’ flows across competing territorial areas which supply tertiary education programs. We will consider a wide range of determinants related to the socio-economic characteristics of the areas as well as resources of the universities in the territories in terms of variety and quantity of the degree programs there available, financial endowments provided by Central Government, and services available to students. The Bradley–Terry modelling approach based on pair comparisons has been adopted to define the attractiveness of competing territories and assess how much the detected divergences can be attributed to factors directly related to the considered characteristics of the universities in the territory and how much is ascribable to inherent characteristics of the areas where the universities are located such as the labour market conditions. Furthermore, the adopted approach allows us to consider uncertainty in defining territorial attractiveness and making comparisons. In this way, we would like to provide some evidences to assess if the rules currently used by the Central Government to finance public universities on the basis of their capabilities to attract students really reward the efforts made by the university system in the area to improve their standard of quality or, on the contrary, reward the territorial features.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal, P., Said, M. E., Sehoole, M. T., Sirozi, M., & De Wit, H. (2008). The dynamics of international student circulation in a global context: Summary, conclusions and recommendations. In P. Agarwal, M. E. Said, M. T. Sehoole, M. Sirozi, & H. De Wit (Eds.), The dynamics of international student circulation in a global context (pp. 233–261). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Agasisti, T., & Dal Bianco, A. (2007). Determinants of college student migration in Italy: Empirical evidence from a gravity approach. In Congress of the European Regional Science Association, pp. 1–14.
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Baryla, E. A., & Dotterweich, D. (2001). Student migration: Do significant factors vary by region? Education Economics, 9(3), 269–280.
Beine, M., Romain, N., & Ragot, L. (2012). The determinants of international mobility of students. CESifo working paper series no. 3848, CESifo Group Munich.
Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324–345.
Brunello, G., & Cappellari, L. (2005). The labour market effect of Alma Mater. IZA discussion paper series, 1562, pp. 1–36.
Cariaci, D., & Nuzzi, A. (2012). Qualità dell’Università e mobilità dei laureati italiani: Evidenze empiriche e proposte di policy. Istituzioni del federalismo: Rivista di studi giuridici e politici, 2, 363–398.
Caruso, R., & de Wit, H. (2013). Determinants of mobility of students in Europe: A preliminary quantitative study. Munich Personal RePEc Archivi MPRA n. 49808, pp. 1–25.
Dal Bianco, A., Spairani, A., & Ricciari, V. (2009). La mobilità degli studenti in Italia: un ‘a‘alisi empirica. Rivista di Economia e statistica del Territorio, 1, 123–143.
De Wit, H. (2008). Changing dynamics in international student circulation: Meanings, push and pull factors, trends and data. In H. De Wit, P. Agarwal, M. E. Said, M. T. Sehoole, & M. Sirozi (Eds.), The dynamics of international student circulation in a global context (pp. 15–46). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dittrich, R., Hatzinger, R., & Katzenbeisser, W. (1998). Modelling the effect of subject-specific covariates in paired comparison studies with an application to university rankings. Applied Statistics, 47, 511–525.
Dotti, N. F., Fratesi, U., Lenzi, C., & Percoco, M. (2013). Local labour markets and the interregional mobility of italian university students. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(4), 443–468.
Firth, D. (2012). qvcalc: Quasi variances for factor effects in statistical models. R package version 0.8-8. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=qvcalc.
Firth, D., & de Menezes, R. X. (2004). Quasi-variances. Biometrika, 91, 65–80.
Fratesi, U., & Percoco, M. (2014). Selective migration, regional growth and convergence: Evidence from Italy. Regional Studies, 48(10), 1650–1668.
Fratesi, U., & Riggi, M. R. (2007). Does migration reduce regional disparities? The role of skill-selective flows. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 19(1), 78–102.
Goldstein, H., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996). League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. Journal of Royal Statistical Society A, 159, 385–443.
Kahanec, M., & Kralikova, R. (2011). Pulls of international student mobility. IZA discussion paper no. 6233, pp. 1–18.
Kratz, F. (2011). Is spatial mobility a reproduction mechanism of inequality? Alma Laurea. Working papers no 26 (pp. 1–16).
Leckie, G., & Goldstein, H. (2009). The limitation of using school league tables to inform school choice. Journal of Royal Statistical Society A, 172(4), 835–851.
Lupi, C., & Ordine, P. (2008). Family income and students’ mobility. Economics & Statistics Discussion Paper, 47, 1–22.
Makovec, M. (2006). Does it pay to study far from home? Explaining the returns to geographic mobility of Italian college graduate. In European association of labour economics annual conference, Prague.
OECD. (2014). Indicator C4: Who studies abroad and where? In Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/888933118656.
Ordine, P., & Rose, G. (2007). The supply of education quality in a spatial model with asymmetric moving costs. In Latin American econometric society annual meeting, Bogotà.
Rumbley, L. (2012). So many data, so little clarity. In J. Beelen & H. De Wit (Eds.), Internalisation revisited: New dimensions in the internationalisation of higher education. Amsterdam: Centre for Applied Research on Economics and Management.
Stigler, S. M. (1994). Citation patterns in the journals of statistics and probability. Statistical Science, 9, 94–108.
Sulis, I., & Porcu, M. (2015). Assessing divergences in mathematics and reading achievement in italian primary schools: A proposal of adjusted indicators of school effectiveness. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 607–634.
Svimez. (2009). Rapporto sull’economia del Mezzogiorno. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Teichler, U., Ferencz, I., Wächter, B. (Eds.). (2011). Mapping mobility in European higher education, vol. I: Overview and trends, Dok&Mat (Vol. 69). Bonn: Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst.
Turner, H., & Firth, D. (2012). Bradley–Terry models in R: The BradleyTerry2 package. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(9), 1–21.
Van Bouwel, L., & Veugelers, R. (2013). The determinants of student mobility in Europe: The quality dimension. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 172–190.
Varin, C., Cattelan, M., & Firth, D. (2016). Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A , 179, 1–63.
Viesti, G. (2005). Nuove migrazioni. Il ‘trasferimento’ di forza lavoro giovane e qualificata dal Sud al Nord. Rivista Bimestrale di Cultura e di Politica, 4, 678–688.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giambona, F., Porcu, M. & Sulis, I. Students Mobility: Assessing the Determinants of Attractiveness Across Competing Territorial Areas. Soc Indic Res 133, 1105–1132 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1407-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1407-1