Skip to main content
Log in

Human Development and National Culture: A Multivariate Exploration

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the relationship between different aspects of human development and Hofstede’s six dimensions of national culture. Using multivariate regression and canonical correlation analysis, we show that all the dimensions of national culture except masculinity have a significant impact on human development, and that the overall strength of the association between the two groups of variables is a high positive one. In general, the direction of the influence of the national culture variables on economic growth differs from the manner they influence other variables, which reinforces the fact that economic growth does not always translate into true people-centred development. Furthermore, the national culture dimensions do not explain much of the variation in a number of health indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that the adolescent fertility rate, in addition to being a health variable, can also be considered as a measure of gender equality.

  2. Collier and Levitsky (1997) discuss conceptual stretching in the context of democracy; they warn of the need to overcome the temptation to stretch the definition of democracy, because it could make its meaning unclear and cause it to be used inappropriately.

  3. The results of all the regressions carried out under the forward selection procedure are not provided in the paper. They are available upon request.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The economics of growth (Vol. 1). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2005). Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–135. doi:10.1080/146498805200034275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland, R., & Hoorn, A. (2015). Are scores on Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture stable over time? A cohort analysis. Global Strategy Journal, 5(3), 223–240. doi:10.1002/gsj.1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2012). On the misuse of national culture dimensions. International Marketing Review, 29(6), 673–683.

  • Cardon, P. W., & Marshall, B. A. (2008). National culture and technology acceptance: The impact of uncertainty avoidance. Issues in Information Systems, 9(2), 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, F. (2005). A critical examination of Hofstede’s thesis and its application to international reward management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9), 1545–1563. doi:10.1080/09585190500239044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2006). Elgar Companion to Development Studies Retrieved from http://QUT.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=274933.

  • Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451. doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mooij, M. (2013). On the misuse and misinterpretation of dimensions of national culture. International Marketing Review, 30(3), 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edward, T. (1976). Hall, Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books.

  • Eskildsen, J., Kristensen, K., & Antvor, H. G. (2010). The relationship between job satisfaction and national culture. The TQM Journal, 22(4), 369–378. doi:10.1108/17542731011053299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2005). National culture and human resource management: Assumptions and evidence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(6), 971–986. doi:10.1080/09585190500120772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, W. (2009). National culture and global diffusion of business-to-consumer e-commerce. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48. doi:10.1257/jep.20.2.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U. (2003). The human development paradigm. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, K. (2008). Amartya Sen and Mahbub ul Haq: A friendship that continues beyond life. Journal of Human Development, 9(3), 329–330. doi:10.1080/14649880802236524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long- versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493–504. doi:10.1080/13602381003637609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010a). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010b). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (Vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, A., & Levinson, D. J. (1954). National character: The study of modal personality and sociocultural systems. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 977–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, H. (1979). World economic development: 1979 and beyond. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2008). A Quarter Century of Culture’s Consequences: A Review of Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede’s Cultural Values Framework (Vol. 4, pp. III46). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288. doi:10.1162/003355300555475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, E. (2012). National cultures and human development index. Psychological Topics, 21(3), 549.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith-a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118. doi:10.1177/0018726702055001602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkov, M. (2013a). Cross-cultural analysis: The science and art of comparing the world’s modern societies and their cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minkov, M. (2013b). Theoretical versus empirical perspectives. In Cross-cultural analysis: The science and art of comparing the world’s modern societies and their cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

  • Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2012). Hofstede’s fifth dimension: New evidence from the world values survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1), 3–14. doi:10.1177/0022022110388567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, M. R., Gragnolati, M., Burke, K. A., & Paredes, E. (2000). Measuring living standards with proxy variables. Demography, 37(2), 155–174. doi:10.2307/2648118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onel, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). The effects of national culture and human development on environmental health. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16(1), 79–101. doi:10.1007/s10668-013-9464-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., Shils, E. A., & Smelser, N. J. (1965). Toward a general theory of action: Theoretical foundations for the social sciences. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rencher, A. C., & Christensen, W. F. (2012). Canonical Correlation Wiley series in probability and statistics: Methods of multivariate analysis (3rd ed. pp. 759–768).

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114. doi:10.1080/146498805200034266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. (2001). Tropical underdevelopment (No. w8119). Cambridge Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel Craig, C., & Douglas, S. P. (2006). Beyond national culture: Implications of cultural dynamics for consumer research. International Marketing Review, 23(3), 322–342. doi:10.1108/02651330610670479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorini, P., Wiesemes, R., & Murphy, R. (2009). Developing alternative frameworks for exploring intercultural learning: a critique of Hofstede’s cultural difference model. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 253–264. doi:10.1080/13562510902898825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L., Gong, B., & Ruppel, C. P. (2012). A contingency theory of corruption: The effect of human development and national culture. The Social Science Journal, 49(1), 90–97. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2011.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2001). The role of national culture in international marketing research. International Marketing Review, 18(1), 30–44. doi:10.1108/02651330110381970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., Weaver, K. M., & Dickson, P. H. (2000). The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 951–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, E. P., & Hardaker, G. (1994). The importance of organizational and national culture. European Business Review, 94(5), 3–14. doi:10.1108/09555349410068830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. Z., & Wilson, S. (2012). Does culture still matter?: The effects of individualism on national innovation rates. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 234–247. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: uses and interpretation (Vol. 07-047). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Timm, N. H. (2002). Applied multivariate analysis. Secaucus, NJ: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F. (2011). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1930). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Unwin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111(470), 295–321. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharmila Gamlath.

Additional information

The author would like to thank two anonymous referees for their valuable comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gamlath, S. Human Development and National Culture: A Multivariate Exploration. Soc Indic Res 133, 907–930 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1396-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1396-0

Keywords

Navigation