Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Triangulated and Exploratory Study of the Relationships Between Secularization, Religiosity, and Social Wellbeing

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By comparing mainly religious America and secular Europe, several scholars (e.g. Harris, Paul, and Zuckerman) suggested a strong correlation between secularization (non-religiosity) and social well-being. The authors of this paper argue that the preceding thesis may be too simplistic and Western-centric. Without attempting to affirm any specific hypothesis, these authors employed exploratory data analysis and data visualization to unveil patterns found in worldwide data, including the 2013 United Nations Human Development Report, the 2014 Gallup’s Global Wellbeing Index, and the 2013 World Values Survey. It was found that the relationship between secularization and social well-being is not straightforward or clear-cut. In some cases, secularization or lack of religiosity is seemingly linked to better quality of life (e.g. disbelief and inequality-adjusted human development index), while in other cases, the relationship is reversed (e.g. skepticism and adolescent birth rate). In most situations there is no association at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archbishops’ Council. (2012). Church Statistics 2010/11: Parochial attendance, membership and finance statistics together with statistics of licensed ministers for the Church of England, January to December. Retrieved from http://www.chur-chofengland.org/media/1477827/2010_11church-statistics.pdf

  • Aten, J. D., & Leach, M. M. (Eds.). (2009). Spirituality and the therapeutic process: A comprehensive resource from intake to termination. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (2014). The many altars of modernity: Toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2008). Religious America, secular Europe? A theme and variations. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowland, S., Edmond, T., & Fallot, R. D. (2012). Evaluation of a spiritually focused intervention with older trauma survivors. Social Work, 57(1), 73–82. doi:10.1093/sw/swr001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. New York, NY: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ridder-Symoens, H. (2003). A history of the university in Europe: Volume 1, Universities in the Middle Ages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (2014). The bonobo and the atheist. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberstadt, M. (2013). How the West really lost God: A new theory of secularization. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey. (2015). ESS data. Retrieved from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/

  • Florea, A. I., & Caudill, S. B. (2014). Happiness, religion and economic transition. Economics of Transition, 22(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 23, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, D. (1998). Shèhuì zhuǎnxíng qí zhōngguó zōngjiào de shìsú huà qīngxiàng [The secular inclination of Chinese religions in the social change period]. Xuéshù jiāoliú [Academic Exchange], 5, 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup. (2014). Gallup Global Wellbeing. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/126965/gallup-global-wellbeing.aspx

  • Gorski, P. S., & Altinordu, A. (2008). After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 55–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2006). The myth of secular moral chaos. Retrieved from http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php/articles/2863

  • Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, S(1), 3–17. doi:10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdcroft, B. (2006). What is religiosity? Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 10(1), 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H. O. (2010). How do religions differ in their impact on individuals’ social capital? The case of South Korea. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H., & Bussing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemiological studies. Religions, 1, 78–85. doi:10.3390/rel1010078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. Y. (2008). Well-being and spirituality from a Korean perspective: Based on the study of culture and subjective well-being. Pastoral Psychology, 56, 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, S. S. (2010). Zhōngguó zōngjiào shìsú huà de wénhuà jīchǔ [The cultural foundation of Chinese religious secularization]. Xuéshù tàntǎo [Academic Discussion], 4, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelkes, O. (2006). Tasting freedom: Happiness, religion and economic transition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 59, 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. (2001). Zhōngguó zōngjiào shìsú huà yǔ shèhuì fāzhǎn zhī ǒuhé qūshì [Convergence trend of Chinese religious secularization and social development]. Journal of Mianyang Teachers College, 20(1), 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. & Zuckerman, P. (2013). The Great Debate: Marshall vs. Zuckerman (Christianity vs. Secular Humanism). Adventure Christian Church, Scheduled Debate. Roseville, California. 12 Oct 2013.

  • Menon, A. K., Praveen, N., & Sagar, M. V. (2014). A descriptive study of the socio-demographic determinants influencing adolescent pregnancy in Shimoga Town, Karnataka. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 3, 552–555. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2014.210220143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merutiu, M. D. (2009). Christian heritage and democracy in Europe. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 21, 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milacci, F. (2006). Moving towards faith: An inquiry into spirituality in adult education. Christian Higher Education, 5, 211–233. doi:10.1080/15363750500408157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NatCen Social Research. (2011). The British Social Attitudes Survey. Retrieved from http://ir2.flife.de/data/nat-cen-social-research/igb_html/index.php?bericht_id=1000001&index=&lang=ENG

  • National Opinion Research Center. (2015). NORC. Retrieved from http://www.norc.org/Pages/default.aspx

  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2012). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. (2014a). The health of nations. Skeptic, 19(3), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. (2014b). The science of religion. Retrieved from http://www.gspaulscienceofreligion.com/

  • Pollack, D. (2008). Religious change in Europe: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. Social Compass, 55(2), 168–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seol, K. O., Park, J. E., & Park, S. Y. (2012). Jonggyoseonggwa jeongsingeonganggwaui gwangye metabunseog- Gugnae haghoeji gejaenonmun (1995–2011) eul jungsimeulo [Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analytic review (1995–2011)]. Hangugsimlihaghoeji:Ilban [Korean Journal of Psychology: General], 31, 617–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B. L. (2010). Zhōngxī shì huà bǐjiào yánjiū [Comparing the paths of Chinese and Western secularization]. Tongi University Journal (Social Science Section), 21(4), 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Society of Religion, 60, 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2015). For the glory of God: How monotheism led to reformations, science, witch-hunts, and the end of slavery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, J. (1979). Reflection on the secularization thesis in the sociology of religion in Japan. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 6(1/2), 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szonyi, M. (2009). Secularization theories and the study of Chinese religions. Social Compass, 56(3), 312–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2013). Marriage and divorce. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/Demographic/sconcerns/mar/default.htm

  • United Nations Human Development. (2014). Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI). Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/inequality-adjusted-human-development-index-ihdi

  • Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiktor-Mach, D. (2011). On secularization, modernity and Islamic revival in the post-Soviet context. Polish Sociological Review, 175, 393–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, W., & Williamson, E. (2007). The cultural contradictions of mainline family ideology and practice. In Don S. Browning & David A. Clairmont (Eds.), American religions and the family (p. 50). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1969). Religion in secular society. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1976a). Contemporary transformations of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1976b). Aspects of secularization in the West’. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 3, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1982). Religion in sociological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1994). If religion declines, will the social order survive? Onze Alma Mater, 48, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Values Survey. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp

  • Wright, B., & Stetzer, E. (2010). Christians are hate-filled hypocrites…and other lies you’ve been told: A sociologist shatters myths from the secular and Christian media. Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. (2014). Asian modernization and mediatization of religion. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 13(39), 68–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. H., Wong, G., Reimer, D., Snijder, J-P., Yu, A., & Yip, T. (2015, February). Can statistical science be used to affirm the inverse relationship between religiosity and social wellbeing? Paper presented at Southern California Christian in Science Conference, Azusa, CA.

  • Zuckerman, P. (2008). Society without god. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2012). Faith no more: Why people reject religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2013, Feb 20–22). Secularism on the edge: The church and the state in the United States, France, and Israel. Georgetown University, Scheduled Interview.

  • Zuckerman, P. (2014). Living the secular life: New answers to old questions. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2015, April 19). Living the secular life: New answers to old questions. Lecture delivered at Skeptics Society, Pasadena, CA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Ho Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, C.H., Reimer, D., Lee, A. et al. A Triangulated and Exploratory Study of the Relationships Between Secularization, Religiosity, and Social Wellbeing. Soc Indic Res 131, 1103–1119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1290-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1290-9

Keywords

Navigation