Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Water Poverty in China Using Holistic and Dynamic Principal Component Analysis

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Water Poverty Index (WPI) expands the analysis of China’s water crises from hydrology to a broader focus on integrated water resources management including economic and social factors. This index was revised by principal component analysis (PCA) to avoid arbitrariness of weights and collinearity between variables. However, the traditional PCA is primarily oriented for static data, and it fails to reveal the evolutionary trend of data over time. Moreover, the conventional normalization methods are not adequate when the dimension of time is added to the data. In this study, the transformation of centralized logarithm of initial variable and holistic and dynamic principal component analysis are firstly proposed, then the improved methods are applied to assess water poverty in China using panel data from 2004 to 2012. The estimated WPI shows the growing scale and the clustering trend of regional water poverty. The analysis of influential factors reveals that aquatic environmental pollution is a vital driver of water poverty. Water resource endowment is the second important factor concerning regional water poverty. Inability to adapt to water scarcity, which leads to weak physical water access and low efficiency of water use, is still a critical driver of regional water poverty. Finally, the regional disparities and alleviation strategies of water poverty are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cho, I. D., Ogwang, T., & Opio, C. (2010). Simplifying the Water Poverty Index. Social Indicators Research, 97, 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal components analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feitelson, E., & Chenoweth, J. (2002). Water poverty: Towards a meaningful indicator. Water Policy, 4, 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gine Garriga, R., & Perez Foguet, A. (2010). Improved method to calculate a Water Poverty Index at local scale. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 11, 1287–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gine Garriga, R., & Perez Foguet, A. (2011). Application of a revised Water Poverty Index to target the water poor. Water Science and Technology, 6, 1099–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. (1996). Basic water requirements for human activities: Meeting basic needs. Water International, 21, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidecke, C. (2006). Development and evaluation of a regional water poverty index for Benin. EPT Discussion Paper 145, Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, January. http://www.ifpri.org/divs/EPTD/DP/papers/eptdp145.pdf

  • Jemmali, H., & Matoussi, M. S. (2013). A multidimensional analysis of water poverty at local scale: Application of improved water poverty index for Tunisia. Water Policy, 15, 98–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemmali, H., & Sullivan, C. (2014). Multidimensional analysis of water poverty in MENA region: An empirical comparison with physical indicators. Social Indicator Research, 115, 253–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. (2009). China’s water scarcity. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3185–3196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis [M] (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Incorporation, publishing as Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T. (1986). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Komnenic, V., Ahlers, R., & Zaag, P. (2009). Assessing the usefulness of water poverty index by applying it to a special case: Can one be water poor with high levels of access? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 34, 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P., Meigh, J., Sullivan, C. (2002). The water poverty index: An international comparison. Keele Economics Research Paper, 19. Staffordshire, UK.

  • Liu, Z., Wang, X., & Chen, X. (2012). The influence of data transformation to extracting principal component. Science Technology and Engineering, 12(6), 1348–1351. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle, F., & Mollinga, P. (2003). Water poverty indicators: Conceptual problems and policy issues. Water Policy, 5(5), 529–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., et al. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Papers.

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite-indicator building. In: Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, European Commission

  • National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Environmental Protection. China Statistical Yearbook on Environment. (2005–2013). China Statistic Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese). http://www.stats.gov.cn/ staticreq.htm

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook. (2005–2013). China Statistic Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese). http://www.stats.gov.cn/ easyquery.htm?cn=E0103

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2007). Environmental performance reviews: China. Paris, France: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez Foguet, A., & Gine Garriga, R. (2011). Analyzing water poverty in basins. Water Resources Management, 25(14), 3595–3612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. (2011). China to spend billions cleaning up groundwater. Science, 334, 745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijsberman, F. R. (2006). Water scarcity: Fact or fiction? Agricultural Water Management, 80(1–3), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SC (State Council, P.R. China). (2006). The 11th Five-Year National Plan for Social and Economic Development. Beijing, China: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. (2002). Calculating a water poverty index. World Development, 30(7), 1195–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. (2005). Method to develop and describe community level water poverty index scores. UK: CEH Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C., Meigh, J., et al. (2003). The Water Poverty Index: Development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, 27, 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C., Meigh, J., et al. (2007). Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales. Water Resources Management, 21(1), 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, H. (2010). China’s water scarcity and its implications for domestic and international stability. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 37, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WB (World Bank). (2007). Water pollution emergencies in China. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, S. (2001). The application and consideration about principal component analysis. Data Statistics and Management, 20(2), 52–56. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., & Chen, S. (1996). The principal component analysis on component data and its applications. Mathematical Statistics and Management, 15(3), 11–15. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, O., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006). Comparing aggregation methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure. Ecological Economics, 59(3), 305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Humanities and Social Science Research Fund of Ministry of Education of P.R. China under Grant No. 11YJC840038, and under Grant No. 14YJA840010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, 205 Luoshi Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Ane Pan & Huimin Ma

  2. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Darrell Bosch

Authors
  1. Ane Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Darrell Bosch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huimin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ane Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, A., Bosch, D. & Ma, H. Assessing Water Poverty in China Using Holistic and Dynamic Principal Component Analysis. Soc Indic Res 130, 537–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1191-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1191-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation