Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bringing Affect Back in: Measuring and Comparing Subjective Well-Being Across Countries

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, researchers and policymakers have paid increasing attention to cross-country comparisons of subjective well-being. Whereas classical theories of quality of life emphasize the central role of affective well-being (i.e., whether a person feels good or bad), previous comparative studies have focused almost exclusively on life satisfaction (i.e., cognitive evaluations of life). This study brings affect into the comparative study of subjective well-being, constructing a new measurement instrument that captures both the affective and cognitive dimensions of subjective well-being. Using European Social Survey data and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, we estimate latent country means for the two dimensions and compare country rankings across the two measures. The results reveal important differences in country rankings depending on whether one focuses on affective well-being or life satisfaction. We identify crucial differences among top-ranking countries and, perhaps even more importantly, considerable differences in rankings among more moderately ranking countries. In a second step, we compare and evaluate the single-item measures commonly used in previous research with the results based on our new measures. We conclude by discussing our results in relation to previous studies, and in terms of their possible implications for future research and for policymakers bent on improving national levels of subjective well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 392–412). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L., & Russell, J. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1879). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Reprinted in 1948. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, J. (2003). Cross-cultural equivalence with structural equation modeling. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. Van de Vijver, & P Ph Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blore, J. D. (2008). Subjective wellbeing: An assessment of competing theories. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Deakin University, Geelong.

  • Bradburn, N. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brax, D. (2009). Hedonism as the explanation of value. Doctoral dissertation. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brülde, B. (2007). Happiness theories of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 15–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac, M. (1992). Pleasure: the common currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 173–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, E. (2008). A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2(1), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2010). Income, aging, health and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Research findings in the economics of aging. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Arora, R., Harter, J., & William, T. (2009). Income’s differential influence on judgments of life versus affective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing wellbeing: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 233–246). New York: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Tov, W. (2012). National accounts of well-being. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 137–158). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, S., Akay, A., Brereton, F., Cunado, J., Martinsson, P., & Moro, M. (2013). Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe. Ecological Economics, 88, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. and Garling, T. (2011). The relationships between life satisfaction, happiness, and current mood. Journal of Happiness Studies 1331–45.

  • Haybron, D. (2007). Life satisfaction, ethical reflection, and the science of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 99–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, John F., Layard, Richard, Sachs, Jeffery (2012). World happiness report. United Nations.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008a). Development, freedom, and rising happiness a global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008b). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Riis, J. (2005). Living and thinking about it: Two perspectives on life. In F. A. Huppert, N. Baylis, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The Science of well-being (pp. 285–304). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey  method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.

  • Kahneman, D., Schkade, D. A., Fischler, C., Krueger, A. B., & Krilla, A. (2010). The structure of well-being in two cities: life satisfaction and experienced happiness in Columbus, Ohio and Rennes, France. International Differences in Well-Being, 1(9), 16–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kööts-Ausmees, L., Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2012). The relationship between life satisfaction and emotional experience in 21 European countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in sem and macs models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut-off values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2005). Happiness: The science behind your smile. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). How’s life?. Measuring Well-Being: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S. (2010). Culture and well-being: Conceptual and methodological issues. In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, & J. F. Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 34–69). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number: Some non-controversial options for governments. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. (2007). Can questions travel successfully? In Jowell, et al. (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally (pp. 53–79). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–48). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 304–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship be-tween personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross- national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, M., Tumasjan, A., & Spörrle, M. (2011). Be yourself, believe in yourself, and be happy: Self-efficacy as a mediator between personality factors and subjective well-being. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tännsjö, T. (2007). Narrow hedonism. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Velde, S., Bracke, P., Levecque, K., & Meuleman, B. (2010). Gender differences in depression in 25 European countries after eliminating measurement bias in the CES-D 8. Social Science Research, 39, 396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, D., Kruger, J., Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2003). What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choice. Psychological Science, 14, 520–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Beteendevetarhuset, Vindarnas torg 1, Umeå, Sweden

    Filip Fors & Joakim Kulin

Authors
  1. Filip Fors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joakim Kulin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filip Fors.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1 and 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fors, F., Kulin, J. Bringing Affect Back in: Measuring and Comparing Subjective Well-Being Across Countries. Soc Indic Res 127, 323–339 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0947-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0947-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation