Abstract
This paper reports a qualitative study which sought to operationalise Sen’s capability approach in the context of chronic pain. The resulting capability-instrument will allow treatments and services to be evaluated according to whether they enable users to achieve those things which they value in life. This is particularly important in chronic conditions, where the emphasis is often on helping the patient to live their life as fully as possible despite persistent symptoms. Participatory methods were used to identify a list of capabilities deemed important to those with chronic pain. Respondents were recruited through a Pain Management Clinic in the East of England (n = 16). Focus groups were followed-up by individual interviews (n = 6). The following eight capabilities were identified as being important: Love and social inclusion; Enjoyment; Respect and Identity; Remaining physically and mentally active; Independence and autonomy; Societal and family roles; Physical and mental well-being; Feeling secure about the future. These have been developed into a questionnaire for self-completion by service users. The impact of chronic pain on well-being extends well beyond health symptoms and the range of health functionings typically considered when evaluating services. The capability-instrument is intended to supplement current evidence by assessing what service users are enabled to do. In its current form it will also be a useful tool for those seeking to deliver patient-centred care. Additional research into valuation and a decision-rule will progress capability as a stand-alone alternative economic framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
ICEpop CAPability measure for older people.
References
Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T., et al. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research, 21(1), 167–176.
Alkire, S. (2008). Using the capability approach: Prospective and evaluative analyses. In F. Comin, M. Qizilbash, & S. Alkire (Eds.), The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Anand, P., Hunter, G., et al. (2005). Capabilities and well-being: Evidence based on the sen-nussbaum approach to welfare. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 9–55.
Blomqvist, K., & Edberg, A. (2002). Living with persistent pain: Experiences of older people receiving home care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(3), 297–306.
Borell, L., Asaba, E., et al. (2006). Exploring experiences of “participation” among individuals living with chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 76–85.
Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., et al. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Breen, J. (2002). Transitions in the concept of chronic pain. Advanced Nursing Science, 24(4), 48–59.
Breivik, H., Collett, B., et al. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain, 10, 287–333.
Carson, M. G., & Mitchell, G. J. (1998). The experience of living with persistent pain. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(6), 1242–1248.
Coast, J. (2009). Maximisation in extra-welfarism: A critique of the current position in health economics. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 786–792.
Coast, J., Peters, T., et al. (2008a). An Assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Qualitative Life Research, 17, 967–976.
Coast, J., Smith, R. D., et al. (2008b). The influence of capabilities on health care decision making in the UK. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1190–1198.
Coast, J., Smith, R. D., et al. (2008c). Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: The spread of ideas in health economics. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1190–1198.
Coast, J., Smith, R. D., et al. (2008d). Should the capability approach be applied in health economics? Health Economics, 17, 667–670.
Coniam, S. W., & Diamond, A. W. (1994). Practical pain management. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.
Corbett, M., Foster, N., et al. (2007). Living with low back pain-stories of hope and despair. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 1584–1594.
Department of Health. (2010). Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. White Paper.
Dewar, A., White, M., et al. (2003). Using nominal group technique to assess chronic pain, patients’ perceived challenges and needs in a community health region. Health Expectations, 6, 44–52.
Dixon-Woods, M. (2011). Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Medicine, 9(39): Commentary 39.
Entwistle, V., Firnigl, D., et al. (2012). Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 17(2), 70–78.
Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2009). Qualitative methods for health research. London: SAGE.
Grewal, I., Lewis, J., et al. (2006). Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1891–1901.
Hadjimichael, O., Kerns, R. D., et al. (2007). Persistent pain and uncomfortable sensations in persons with multiple sclerosis. Pain, 127, 35–41.
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., et al. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20, 1727–1736.
Kothe, R., Kohlmann, T. et al. (2007). Impact of low back pain on functional limitations, depressed mood and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pain, 127(1–2), 103–108.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. California: Sage.
Kwan, K. S. H., Roberts, L. J., et al. (2005). Sexual dysfunction and chronic pain: The role of psychological variables and impact on quality of life. European Journal of Pain, 9(6), 643–652.
Loeser, J. D., & Melzack, R. (1999). Pain: An overview. Lancet, 353(9164), 1607–1609.
Lorgelly, P., Lorimer, K., et al. (2008). The capability approach: Developing an instrument for evaluating public health interventions. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
Miles, S., & Rowe, G. (2004). The laddering technique. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.), Doing social psychology research. Oxford: BPS Blackwell.
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. (2008). Getting to GRIPS with chronic pain in Scotland: Getting relevant information on pain services (2nd ed.). http://www.nationalpainaudit.org/media/files/GRIPS_booklet.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2011.
NICE. (2013). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. Process and Methods Guides 04 April. http://publications.nice.org.uk/pmg9.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Paulson, M., Danielson, E., et al. (2002). Struggling for a tolerable existence: The meaning of men’s lived experiences of living with pain of fibromyalgia type. Qualitative Health Research, 12(2), 238–249.
Pope, C., Ziebland, S., et al. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ Education and Debate, 320, 114–116.
Raheim, M., & Haland, W. (2006). Lived experience of chronic pain and fibromyalgia: Women’s stories of daily life. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 741–761.
Richardson, J. (2005). Establishing the (extra)ordinary in chronic widespread pain. Health, 9(1), 31–48.
Richardson, J., Ong, B. E., et al. (2006). Is chronic widespread pain biographically disruptive. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 1573–1585.
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.
Robeyns, I. (2005). Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74, 191–215.
Ruger, J. P. (2010). Health and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1979). Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Stanford: Stanford University.
Sen, A. (2010). The idea of justice. London: Penguin.
Simon, J., Anand, P., et al. (2013). Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research. Social Science and Medicine. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.019.
Snelling, J. (1994). The effect of chronic pain on the family unit. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 543–551.
Sorensen, E. B., & Askegaard, S. (2007). Laddering: How (not) to do things with words. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10(1), 63–77.
The Australian Medical Services Advisory Committee. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from, http://www.msac.gov.au/.
The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from, http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pbs-general-listing-committee3.htm.
The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from, http://www.cadth.ca/index.php/en/home.
The EUROQOL Group. Retrieved 20 January 2012, from, http://www.euroqol.org/home.html.
The Scottish Medicine Consortium. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from, http://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/.
Thomas, E., Peat, G., et al. (2004). The prevalence of pain and pain interference in a general population of older adults: Cross-sectional findings from the north staffordshire osteoarthritis project (NorStop). Pain, 110, 361–368.
Viswanathan, M., Sudman, S., et al. (2004). Maximum versus meaningful discrimination in scale response: Implications for validity of measurement of consumer perceptions about products. Journal of Business Research, 57, 108–124.
Werner, A., Isaksen, L. W., et al. (2004). ‘I am not the kind of woman who complains of everything’: Illness stories on self and shame in women with chronic pain. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1035–1045.
Acknowledgments
Funding was received from the Pain Management Clinic at the James Paget University NHS Hospital and from a University of East Anglia studentship. As well as the patients and staff at the clinic, we would like to thank members of the Service User Group, convened by the Aberdeen Pain Research Collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: A Capability-Based Questionnaire for Assessing Well-Being in Patients with Chronic Pain
Appendix: A Capability-Based Questionnaire for Assessing Well-Being in Patients with Chronic Pain
-
1.
Being loved and having friendship.
-
I am able to have a lot of love and contact with friends or family
-
I am able to have quite a lot of love and contact with friends or family
-
I am able to have little love and contact with friends or family
-
I am not able to have any love or contact with friends or family
-
-
2.
Being able to do things for fun (Including being in the ‘right frame of mind’ to experience enjoyment in life).
-
I am able to get a lot of enjoyment in life
-
I am able to get quite a lot of enjoyment in life
-
I am able to get little enjoyment in life
-
I am not able to get any enjoyment in life
-
-
3.
Being open, honest, believed, respected and understood (Not being defined as a person with ill health).
-
I am able to feel totally respected and positive about who I am
-
I am able to feel largely respected and positive about who I am
-
I am able to feel somewhat respected and positive about who I am
-
I am not able to feel respected or positive about who I am
-
-
4.
Doing things which are productive and interesting (for example, hobbies, work or sport).
-
I am able to be totally active (both body and mind)
-
I am able to be largely active (both body and mind)
-
I am able to be somewhat active (both body and mind)
-
I am not able to be active (both body and mind)
-
-
5.
Being independent and being able to make decisions.
-
I am able to be as independent as I want to be
-
I am able to be almost as independent as I want to be
-
I am able to be much less independent than I want to be
-
I am not be able to be independent
-
-
6.
The impact that I have on the lives of others (including: partners, family, colleagues and my local community).
-
I am able to contribute to the well-being and happiness of those closest to me, in many ways
-
I am able to contribute to the well-being and happiness of those closest to me, in some ways
-
I am able to contribute to the well-being and happiness of those closest to me, in few ways
-
I am not at all able to contribute to the well-being and happiness of those closest to me
-
-
7.
My health and mental well-being (including: pain, depression, sleep, mobility, medication side-effects).
-
I have no problems with my physical health or mental well-being
-
I have minor problems with my physical health or mental well-being
-
I have moderate problems with my physical health or mental well-being
-
I have severe problems with my physical health or mental well-being
-
-
8.
Knowing that in the future I will be able to cope
-
When I think about the future I am able to feel completely confident that I will cope
-
When I think about the future I am able to feel largely confident that I will cope
-
When I think about the future I am able to have little confidence that I will cope
-
When I think about the future I am not able to have any confidence that I will cope
-
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinghorn, P., Robinson, A. & Smith, R.D. Developing a Capability-Based Questionnaire for Assessing Well-Being in Patients with Chronic Pain. Soc Indic Res 120, 897–916 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0625-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0625-7