Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Flourishing Scale (FS) and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) developed by Diener et al. (Soc Indic Res 97:143–156, 2010) are brief subjective measures to assess psychological flourishing and feelings. The FS provides a single score from eight items. The 12-item SPANE yields three scores: a positive score (SPANE-P), a negative score (SPANE-N), and a balance score (SPANE-B). In this study, the reliability and validity of the Japanese versions of these scales were evaluated using a sample of 520 Japanese college students. Results showed that the Japanese versions had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88–0.95). The proposed single-factor structure of the FS and two-factor structure of the SPANE were supported by both principal axis factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Acceptable convergent validity of both Japanese versions was shown by correlations with scores for life satisfaction, subjective happiness, optimism, pessimism, positive and negative affect, depression, anxiety, and psychological stress. Moreover, the FS scores expectedly correlated with SPANE-P, SPANE-N, and SPANE-B. The Japanese versions of the FS and SPANE had acceptable reliability and validity, similar to the properties of the original versions

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following Cohen (1988) and Vaus (2002), correlation coefficients were classified as low (0.10–0.29), moderate (0.30–0.49), high (0.50–0.69), and very high (0.70–0.89).

References

  • Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, A. H. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(6), 764–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. In G. Walford, E. Tucker, & M. Viswanathan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of measurement (pp. 151–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarack, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. M. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

  • de Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeLogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15, 187–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., et al. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247–266). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, T. L., & Seeman, T. E. (2010). Social support and physical health: Links and mechanism. In A. Steptoe, K. E. Freedland, & L. Poole (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral medicine: Methods and applications (pp. 225–236). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or VIRTUE: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoguchi, T., & Fujii, S. (2009). The quality of life in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 227–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index (4th Ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Australian centre on quality of life, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/pwi-a-english.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2013.

  • Joshanloo, M., & Nosratabadi, M. (2009). Value priorities as predictors of hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 294–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychological Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete health model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Subjective well-being in mental health and human development research worldwide: An introduction. Social Indicators Research, 77(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). Toward a science of mental health. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–95). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 411–425). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, J., Day, L., & Barber, L. (2005). Forgiveness and happiness. The differing contexts of forgiveness using the distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011). Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: Evidence of differential associations with self-reported well-being. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Sirgy, M. J., & Estes, R. J. (2006). Introducing the official journal of the international society for quality of life studies: Applied Research in Quality of Life (ARQOL). Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrish, J. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2008). Is the study of happiness a worthy scientific pursuit? Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2007). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raibley, J. R. (2011). Happiness is not well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1105–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2001). [Development of the Japanese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scales]. [Japanese Journal of Personality], 9(2), 138–139 [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Self-regulatory processes and responses to health threats: Effects of optimism on well-being. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 395–428). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U. (2007). Methodological issues in the assessment of the affective component of subjective well-being. In A. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 96–110). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimai, S., Orake. K., Utsuki, N., Ikemi, A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2004). [Development of a Japanese version of the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS), and examination of its validity and reliability]. [Japanese Journal of Public Health], 51(10), 845–853 [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, A. J., & Caetano, A. (2011). Validation of the flourishing scale and scale of positive and negative experience in portugal. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudaimonia (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., Sullivan, B. A., & Lorentz, D. (2008). Understanding the search for meaning in life: Personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning. Journal of Personality, 76(2), 199–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumi, K. (1997). Optimism, social support, stress, and physical and psychological well-being in Japanese women. Psychological Reports, 81(1), 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumi, K. (2004). The Japanese version of the revised life orientation test: Reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 95(3), 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumi, K. (2007). [Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Perceived Stress Scale]. [Japanese Journal of Health Psychology], 19(2), 44–53 [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumi, K. (2008). [Optimism, pessimism, social support, and psychological adjustment: A test of a mediation model]. [Journal of Educational and Health Science], 53(3), 119–125 [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2013). World database of happiness: Archive of research findings on subjective enjoyment of life. Erasmus University Rotterdam. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_quer/hqi_fp.htm. Accessed 10 August 2013.

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when contemplating the hedonic treadmill. American Psychologist, 62(6), 612–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Agocha, V. B., et al. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nagare College, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan

    Katsunori Sumi

Authors
  1. Katsunori Sumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsunori Sumi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sumi, K. Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. Soc Indic Res 118, 601–615 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0432-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0432-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation