Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing Urban Public Safety via Indicator-Based Evaluating Method: A Systemic View of Shanghai

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The explosive development of urban Shanghai after China’s economic reform in 1978 has attracted wide attention. There are a plethora of studies attempting to capture the fast dynamics in this global city. Looking into the urban dynamics from a public safety perspective, however, eludes the current literature. Urban public safety has become a primary concern of urban sustainability in recent years due to escalated potential loss if urban public safety is severely breached. This is even more so for megacities like Shanghai. Assessing the current status of urban public safety hence becomes an imperative task for urban sustainability. This research initiates a detailed assessment effort through building a relatively comprehensive set of public safety indicators. Four general aspects of Shanghai’s urban public safety are identified, i.e., urban development, urban crime and instability, urban housing and livability, and urban disasters. From officially published data, field survey and interviews, 34 individual indicators are chosen. Principal component analyses are conducted for each of the four aspects, and a synthetic urban public safety index is derived. The analysis suggests that urban Shanghai’s public safety is gradually increasing due primarily to continuous economic success and increased investment in public safety preparation, education, and prevention. The assessment index is also shown to be able to capture major events affecting Shanghai’s public safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, X. M., Chen, J., & Shi, P. J. (2012). Landscape urbanization and economic growth in China: Positive feedbacks and sustainability dilemmas. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden, K. A., Schmidtlein, M. C., Emrich, C. T., Piegorsch, W. W., & Cutter, S. L. (2007). Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4(2), 1–21. article 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., & Watkins, D. (2009). Social sustainability and urban form: Evidence from five British cities. Environment and Planning A, 41(9), 2125–2142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, K. (2002). City management and urban environmental indicators. Ecological Economics, 40, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H., & Davey, G. (2009). Subjective quality of life in Zhuhai City, South China: A public survey using the International Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 91, 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, J., O’Hare, P., & Hawkesworth, M. (2009). The visibility of (in)security: The aesthetics of planning urban defenses against terrorism. Security Dialogue, 40(4–5), 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, X., Weng, W., & Fan, W. (2008). Cellular automata-based systematic risk analysis approach for emergency response. Risk Analysis, 28(5), 1247–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, J. E., Safford, H., Fotheringham, C. J., Franklin, J., & Moritz, M. (2009). The 2007 Southern California wildfires: Lessons in complexity. Journal of Forestry, 107(6), 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koetse, M. J., & Rietveld, P. (2009). The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(3), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kullberg, A., Karlsson, N., Timpka, T. & Lindqvist, K. (2009). Correlates of local safety-related concerns in a Swedish community: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 9, Art. No. 221.

  • Kurtz, J. C., Jackson, L. E., & Fisher, W. S. (2001). Strategies for evaluating indicators based on guidelines from the environmental protection agency’s office of research and development. Ecological Indicators, 1(1), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, D. (2000). Temporal analysis of human development indicators: Principal component approach. Social Indicators Research, 51, 331–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontidou, L. (2009). China’s urban space: Development under market socialism. Urban Studies, 46, 2936–2938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Liu, X., Hu, D., Wang, R., Yang, W., Li, D., & Zhao, D. (2009). Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: A case study for China’s Jining city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. (2006). Quality of life as a social representation in China: A qualitative study. Social Indicators Research, 75, 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., & Wei, Y. H. D. (2006). Population distribution and spatial structure in transitional Chinese cities: A study of Nanjing. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47(5), 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv, L. C., & Wei, Y. H. D. (2007). Domesticating globalization, new economic spaces, and regional polarization in Guangdong Province, China. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(2), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. J. C. (2008). Urban development in post-reform China: State, market, and space. Urban Studies, 45, 1295–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, J., Spreeuwenberg, P., Van Winsum-Westra, M., Verheij, R. A., de Vries, S., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Is green space in the living environment associated with people’s feelings of social safety? Environment and Planning A, 41(7), 1763–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, H. Y. (1996). Sustainable development indicator system for Shandong Province. Geographic Research, 16(4), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, A., & Kaupenjohann, M. (2000). Derivation of ecosystemic effect indicators method. Ecological Modelling, 130, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. (2004). Urban violence and insecurity: An introductory roadmap. Environment and Urbanization, 16, 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moussipoulos, N., Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C., Spyridi, D., & Nikolaou, K. (2010). Environmental, social and economic information management for the evaluation of the sustainability in urban areas: A system of indicators for Thessaloniki, Greece. Cities, 27, 337–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1997). Better understanding our cities: The role of urban indicators. Paris: OECD publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peris-Mora, E., Diez Orejas, J. M., Subirats, A., Ibáñez, S., & Alvarez, P. (2005). Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 1649–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piegorsch, W. W., Cutter, S. L., & Hardisty, F. (2007). Benchmark analysis for quantifying urban vulnerability to terrorist incidents. Risk Analysis, 27(6), 1411–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repetti, A., & Desthieux, G. (2006). A relational indicator set model for urban land-use planning and management: Methodological approach and application in two case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77, 196–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtlein, M. C., Deutsch, R. C., Piegorsch, W. W., & Cutter, S. L. (2008). A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Analysis, 28, 1099–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senlier, N., Yildiz, R., & Aktas, E. D. (2009). A perception survey for the evaluation of urban quality of life in Kocaeli and a comparison of the life satisfaction with the European cities. Social Indicators Research, 94(2), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Statistical Bureau. (2011). Shanghai statistic yearbook 20012010. Available at: http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/data/release.xhtml, Accessed on January 3, 2013.

  • Shu, X. L., & Zhu, Y. F. (2009). The quality of life in China. Social Indicators Research, 92, 191–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, R., Nielsen, I., & Zhai, Q. G. (2010). Personal well-being in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 95, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanguay, G., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J. F., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2007). Enhancing Urban Safety and Security Global Report on Human Settlements 2007. London: Sterling.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Den Berg, L., Pol, P. M. J., Mingardo, G., & Speller, C. J. M. (2006). The safe city: Safety and urban development in European Cities. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z. S., Fahmy, M. F. M., & Wu, G. (2009). Safety enhancement of urban structures with structural recoverability and controllability. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 3(3), 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. L. (1998). Basic thoughts for constructing an indicator system for regional sustainable development. Progress in Geographic Science, 17(2), 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. L., & Wei, Y. H. D. (2003). Globalization, global cities and global city-regions. Urban Planning Overseas, 71, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. L., & Wei, Y. H. D. (2008). GIS and spatial data analysis of regional development in Greater Beijing, China. Papers in Regional Science, 87, 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. L. & Yin, J. Y. (2011). Internet GIS and system dynamic modeling in urban public safety and security studies: a conceptual framework. In Springer Series of Computer Science Lecture Notes, ICWL 2010 Workshops, LNCS 6537, pp. 207–216.

  • Zhang, X. L., Wu, Y. Z., & Shen, L. Y. (2011). An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: a study of capital cities and municipalities in China. Habitat International, 35, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanglin Fang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, D., Fang, C., Xue, D. et al. Assessing Urban Public Safety via Indicator-Based Evaluating Method: A Systemic View of Shanghai. Soc Indic Res 117, 89–104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0366-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0366-z

Keywords

Navigation