Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Responding to the Psychological Context of Extreme Poverty: Using Cash Transfers to Stimulate Productive Investment Decisions in Bangladesh

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extreme poor in Bangladesh suffer from a particularly severe form of multidimensional poverty. Despite opportunities for investment made available by approaches such as microfinance, which could ensure future subsistence and graduation from poverty, the extreme poor continue to under-invest in long-term income-generating activities. This continued prioritisation of immediate needs perpetuates poverty, and often leads to its intergenerational transfer. While the evolving debate on multidimensional poverty has helped to unpack the structural causes behind this investment behaviour, very little literature has sought to understand the decision process itself. In this paper, we argue that investment decisions by the extreme poor are shaped by the psychological context of life in extreme poverty. We propose a psychological model of how extreme poverty—which is multidimensional as well as commonly chronic—affects the decision-making context of the individual, causing the future to be heavily discounted and inhibiting investment. The psychological impact of extreme poverty could be seen as an overarching and under-emphasised dimension of poverty itself due to its role in undermining the capability to invest, and impeding the long-term security of a household. We argue for a holistic approach to extreme poverty and wellbeing, involving a greater understanding that people’s own perceptions of agency and needs impact upon decision making for the present and the future, in this case specifically towards livelihood choices likely to stimulate productive gains. Using a case study of one demand-driven conditional cash transfer project in Bangladesh, we propose that the psychological context of extreme poverty must be addressed in order to stimulate investment. An analysis of the project’s success suggests that it was able to effectively promote investment by altering the context within which investment decisions were made. The paper concludes that effective poverty reduction programming must more directly address the psychological context of poverty and decision-making, and recommends that innovative choice architecture could provide one method of doing so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Most commentators on extreme poverty in Bangladesh see a top daily income threshold of between $0.29 and $0.72 per household member.

  2. In December 2008 there were more than 11,700 branches and 5,000 microfinance institutions (MFIs) in the country (Microfinance Initiative for Asia 2009).

  3. Enterprise tracking information was collected on an ongoing basis by field staff.

  4. Available from http://www.shiree.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Lesson-Learning-Report-Green-Hill.pdf. Accessed 08 Mar 2013.

  5. Figure from the first round of transfers.

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 32–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamgir, D., & Mallorie, E. (2008). Assisting the poorest out of poverty. IFAD. Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey (BDHS) (2007).

  • Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth; human needs in organizational settings. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010) Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI). Working Paper No. 38.

  • Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. V, & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. PublicAffairs.

  • Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2009). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation, Financial Access Initiative and Innovations for Poverty Action. http://financialaccess.org/sites/default/files/The%20Microfinance%20Miracle%20with%20CP.pdf. Accessed May 08, 2011.

  • Bernheim, B. D., Ray, D., & Yeltekin, S. (2011). Poverty and self-control, Mimeo. http://www.econ.yale.edu/seminars/microt/mt10/ray-110223.pdf. Accessed May 08, 2011.

  • Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D., Morduch, J., Rutherfood, S., & Ruthven, O. (2009). Portfolios of the poor: How the world’s poor live on $2 a day. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, J., & Camfield, L. (2009). Measuring subjective wellbeing in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Peru and Thailand using a personal life goal satisfaction approach. Wellbeing in developing countries (WeD). Working paper 09/45.

  • Dalton, P., Ghosal, S., & Mani, A. (2010). ‘Poverty and Aspirations Failure’, Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy. Working paper no. 22. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/centres/cage/research/papers/22.2010_revised.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2011.

  • Deneulin, S., & McGregor, A. (2009). The capability approach and the politics of a social conception of wellbeing. Wellbeing in developing countries (WeD). Working paper 09/43.

  • Devereux, S. (2003). Conceptualising destitution, IDS working paper 216. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, J., & Wood, G. D. (2010). Who are the extreme poor: Extreme poverty in Bangladesh and the need for a new political settlement. Shiree extreme poverty series, Vol. 6.

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E. (2003). Poor but rational. Mimeo. http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/747. Accessed May 08, 2011.

  • Easterly, W. (2011). Measuring how and why aid works—or doesn’t. Wall Street Journal. Online. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703956904576287262026843944.html. Accessed May 07, 2011.

  • Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59(2), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiszbein, A., & Shady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. Washington, DC): World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1986). Economic locus of control. Human Relations, 39(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genicot, G., & Ray, D. (2009). Aspirations, inequality, investment and mobility. Mimeo. http://www.nyu.edu/econ/user/debraj/Courses/Readings/GenicotRayAspirations.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2011.

  • Goldstein, M., & Udry, C. (1998). Agricultural innovation and resource management in Ghana. Mimeo, final report to IFPRI under MP17. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/pubs/training/gender/udry.pdf. Accessed May 08, 2011.

  • Gray, L. C., & Moseley, W. G. (2005). A geographical perspective on poverty-environment interactions. The Geographical Journal, 50(1), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss-White, B. (2002). Working paper number 86: A note on destitution. Paper for the dissemination workshop of the NCAER/QEH/DfID project on poverty: Alternative realities. NCAER, New Delhi.

  • Holmes, R., Farrington, J., Rahman, T., & Slater, R. (2008). Extreme poverty in Bangladesh: Protecting and promoting rural livelihoods. Project briefing no. 15. London: Overseas Development Institute.

  • Hossain, N. (2006). Inheriting extreme poverty: Household aspirations, community attitudes and childhood in northern Bangladesh. Save the Children UK and Brac.

  • Kane, T. J. (1987). Giving back control: Long-term poverty and motivation. Social Service Review, 3, 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. (1961). The children of Sanchez: Autobiography of a Mexican family. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macours, K., & Vakis, R. (2009). Changing households investments and aspirations through social interactions: evidence from a randomized transfer program. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5137.

  • Malthus, T. R. (1872). An essay on the principle of population, 7th edn. London: Reeves and Turner (1999). An essay on the principle of population. Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Marks, G. (2011) If I were a poor black kid. Forbes online. http://www.forbes.com/sites/quickerbettertech/2011/12/12/if-i-was-a-poor-black-kid. Accessed March 15, 2012.

  • Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development. Conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.

  • Microfinance Initiative for Asia (MIFA). (2009). Bangladesh: Microfinance and financial sector diagnostic study: Final report. International Finance Corporation and KFW Bankengruppe.

  • Moreira, V. (2003). Poverty and psychopathology. In S. C. Carr & T. S. Sloan (Eds.), Poverty and psychology. From global perspective to local practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenun Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G. I., & Schober, B. I. (1992). The satisfied poor: Development of an intervention-oriented theoretical framework to explain satisfaction with a life in poverty. Social Indicators Research, 28(2), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pick, S., Beers, K., & Grossman-Crist, S. (2011) A human basis for sustainable development: How psychological change at the individual level promotes development. Poverty & Public Policy, 3(3), Article 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, S., & Sirkin, J. (2010). Breaking the poverty cycle: The human basis for sustainable development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. (2003). Aspirations, poverty and economic change. In A. Banerjee, R. Benabou, & D. Mookherjee (Eds.), Understanding poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sebstad, J., & Cohen, M. (2000). Microfinance, risk management, and poverty. Washington: Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987). The standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, A. (2011). Tackling chronic poverty. The policy implications of research on chronic poverty and poverty dynamics. Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre (CPRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1982). First things first: Meeting basic human needs in developing countries. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. (1999). Draft report on OVC economic strengthening strategy: Household economic strengthening in Tanzania—Technical guidance for PEPFAR II programming. United States Agency for International Development. Used with permission.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mong Shenuk Marma, Swe Hla Mong Marma, Md. Nurul Alam, Kya Sa Ching Marma and Ram Siam Bawm from the IMPACT project for their support during field research, and those who provided comments on various drafts of this paper, particularly Jonathan Perry, Colin Risner, and David Jackman from EEP/shiree, Joe Devine and Lucia Dacorta from the Centre for Development Studies (CDS) at Bath University, and clinical psychologists Dr. Theresa Jones and Kathleen Coppens. Some data used in this publication comes from the Economic Empowerment of the Poorest programme (www.shiree.org), an initiative established by the Department for International Development and the Government of Bangladesh to help 1 million people lift themselves out of extreme poverty. The views expressed here are entirely those of the author(s).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Maclay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maclay, C., Marsden, H. Responding to the Psychological Context of Extreme Poverty: Using Cash Transfers to Stimulate Productive Investment Decisions in Bangladesh. Soc Indic Res 113, 691–710 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0296-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0296-9

Keywords

Navigation