Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does Good Governance Enhance Happiness: A Cross Nation Study

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the efficiency of the countries over the period of 10 years by applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Based on rational and factual parameters such as freedom of press, freedom of religion, percentage of export in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), index of globalization, life expectancy at birth, gender ratio etc., this paper attempts to measure the efficiency of happiness. A combination of social and economic factors has been used to measure technical efficiency. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, it measures the relative efficiency of all the countries included in the study. The nations have been ranked as per their relative efficiency and the peer group has been formed. Second a comparison between the rich and the poor countries have been done to test empirically whether the economic growth enhances the happiness among people. Presently, more than 3,000 studies have been published on happiness and Veenhoven in 2004 created a database called World Database of Happiness. The World Database of Happiness has attempted to present the available research findings on happiness. Part of the findings on happiness in nations is available in ‘States of nations’. For the research purpose, States of Nations and the data published by have been considered. Although happiness has been quantified and the existing literature has sufficient empirical evidences of the same, in the present context, the relative efficiency has been calculated for the countries on basis of objective and subjective happiness parameters. As per the literature, happiness has two aspects (1) objective and (2) subjective. Objective parameters are external to the individuals and covers material living parameters viz. GDP growth, income, nutrition, mortality rate, literacy etc. However, Subjective indicators measure the quality of life of the individuals. These are summarized as ‘‘subjective well-being’’. The various parameters considered in the study capture different aspects of happiness. The result shows how the government can increase the happiness of the people by analyzing the behavior and expectations. People express their preference explicitly about political parties, religion believes, law and order situation, trust in official institutions etc. Although, the behavior of people largely depends upon availability of goods and services in the market, the government can make budgets according to priority or preferences of people. Another way to increase happiness can be done by analyzing the peer group, which is an outcome of DEA. This shows the nations which are similar in terms of their economic and social conditions. The government can compare the prevailing conditions in different countries that improve the condition in their respective country. This could be an effective method as some of the parameters can be replicable in order to make people happier. The limitation of this study is lack of availability of data for many countries. As the number of countries increases, a change in the relative efficiency can be observed. Therefore, a future study can be conducted where the relevant data can be collected and a more global result can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of quality of life. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2001a). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2001b). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald A. J. (2000). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Mimeo. Available at:http://www.dartmouth.edu/blnchr/papers/Wellbeingnew.pdf.

  • Bolle, F., Okhrin, Y., & Vogel, C. (2009). A note on interdependent happiness. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 713–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J., Hirschberg, J. G., & Lye, J. N. (2001). Data reduction of discrete responses: An application of cluster analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 8, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, W. (1953). How nations see each other. A study in public opinion. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concern. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Cooper, W. W., Thompson, R. G., & Thrall, R. M. (1996). Extensions and new developments.

  • Cummins, R. A. (1993). Comprehensive quality of life scale for adults. Manual ComQol-A4. Australia: Deakin University, School of Psychology.

  • Cummins, R. (2000). ‘Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model’. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Acci, L. (2011). Measuring well-being and progress. Social Indicator Research, 104, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Shao, L., Smith, H. L., & Suh, E. M. (1995). National differences in reported subjective wellbeing: Why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. (2010). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin et al. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, December 13, 2010.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In I. P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(19), 11176–11183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 120(3), 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferriss, A. (2006), History of QOL studies from a sociological perspective. Social Indicators Research, 76(53) ‘‘The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future’’, pp. 163–187.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). What can economists learn from happiness research. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. P. (1976). Human needs and satisfactions: A global survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C. S., Marques, J., Pinto, M. L., Castro, E. A., Gomes, P. S., Gomes, G., et al. (2008). A multidimensionalidade do conceito de qualidade de vida. Sociedade e Territo′rio, 42, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., Eggers, A., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55, 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2008a). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilke, B., Jan, D., Christian, W., & Hao, Y. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. G., & D. J. Aigner (1987) A classification for medium and small firms by time-of-day electricity usage. In Papers and proceedings of the eight annual north american conference of the International Association of Energy Economists, Cambridge, MA, November 19–21, 1986, pp. 253–257.

  • Hirschberg, J. G., & Dayton, J. R. (1996). Detailed patterns of intra-industry trade in processed food. In: I M. Sheldon & P. C. Abbott (Eds.), Industrial organization and trade in the food industries (pp. 141–159). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

  • Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., & Slottje, D. J. (1991). Cluster analysis for measuring welfare and quality of life across countries. Journal of Econometrics, 50, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., & Slottje, D. J. (2000a). Clusters of attributes and well-being in the US. Journal of Applied Econometrics. Wiley.

  • Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., & Slottje, D. J. (2000b). The environment and the quality of life in the United States over time. Environmental Modelling and Software, 16(6), 525–532(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. G., & Slottje, D. J. (1994). An empirical Bayes approach to analyzing earnings differentials for various occupations and industries. Journal of Econometrics, 61, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacapyr, E. (2008). Cross country determinants of satisfaction with life. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(6), 400–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2005). Measuring inequality of happiness in nations: In search for proper statistics. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 357–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Aart, K., & Massimo, M.(1999). Governance matters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2196.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008). Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2007. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4654, World Bank 2008. Data available at: www.govindicators.org.

  • Kenny, C. (1999). Does growth cause happiness or does happiness cause growth? Kyklos, 52(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2005a). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2005b). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepage, A. (2009). The quality of life as attribute of sustainability. The TQM Journal, 21(2), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. (1975). Quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 2(2), 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1991). Global report on student wellbeing, volume I: Life satisfaction and happiness. New York, USA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G. (2004). Psychology. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economics Journal, 107, 1815–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. C. (2010). Good governance and happiness in nations: Technical quality precedes democracy and quality beats size. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, J. C. de. P., & Tovar, L. S. (2002). ‘Significación de la Calidade de Vida y Revitalización del Espacio Urbano. Un Estudio de Caso. Fermentum, 34, 415–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2000). Identifying welfare effects from subjective questions. Economica, 68, 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, E., & Southwick, L., Jr. (1993). Variations in public and private university performance. Applications of Management Science, 7, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinauny-Stern, S., Mehrez, A., & Barboy, A. (1994). Academic departments efficiency via DEA. Computers & Operations Research, 21(5), 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, E., & Dustan, P. (1994). Guiding schools to improved performance using data envelopment analysis: An illustration with data from a local education authority. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(11), 1247–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, C., & Green, R. (1988). An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis.

  • Türksever, A. N. E., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 53(2), 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations. 1946–1992. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1999). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004). Happiness as a public policy aim: The greatest happiness principle. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 658–678). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2005). Inequality of happiness in nations: Introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2007). Trend average happiness in nations 1946–2006: How much people like the life they live. World Database of Happiness, Trend Report 2007-1. http://www.worlddatabaseofhappiness.

  • Veenhoven, R. (2010). World database of happiness, item bank. Erasmus University Rotterdam.

  • WHOQOL Group. (1995). Measuring quality of life. Available at: www.socialsciencegesis.de/en/social_monitoring/social_indicators/EU_Reporting/index.htm.

  • Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. DC: Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Public Administration, I.P.Estate, Ring Road, New Delhi, 110 002, India

    Roma Mitra Debnath

  2. Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India

    Ravi Shankar

Authors
  1. Roma Mitra Debnath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravi Shankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roma Mitra Debnath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debnath, R.M., Shankar, R. Does Good Governance Enhance Happiness: A Cross Nation Study. Soc Indic Res 116, 235–253 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0275-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0275-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation