Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Evaluation Processes in Life Satisfaction: Uncovering Measurement Non-Equivalence and Age-Related Differences

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study demonstrates how self-evaluation processes explain subgroup differences in ratings of life satisfaction (population heterogeneity). Life domains differ with regard to the constraints they impose on beliefs in internal control. We hypothesized that these differences are linked with cognitive biases in ratings of life satisfaction. In fact, two subgroups of respondents needed to be distinguished, for which life satisfaction scores were non-equivalent measures. Self-evaluation processes also helped to explain age-related differences in life satisfaction. Age was unrelated or positively related to life satisfaction in a subgroup of respondents who perceived comparatively high levels of control over high-constraining life domains such as work, income, and standard of living. However, age yielded a substantial negative relationship with life satisfaction among participants who reported reduced levels of control in these domains. Results from a German representative sample were replicated with data from an online survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1992). Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 989–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, C. J., Cummins, R. A., & Lo, S. K. (2000). The quality of rural and metropolitan life. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N., Beehr, T., Wagner, S., & Libkuman, T. (2005). Adaptation-level theory, opponent process theory, and dispositions: An integrated approach to the stability of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1044–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. Apley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bolman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 917–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). Elmsford NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, M. E. (1998). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol. 17: Focus on emotion and adult development (pp. 304–324). New York, NY, USA: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. (2008). Measuring the immeasurable. In M. Eid & N. R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., & Rauber, M. (2000). Detecting measurement invariance in organizational surveys. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidemeier, H., & Göritz, A. S. (2010). Using factor mixture models for classification: Individual differences in how work and nonwork life domains contribute to subjective well-being (unpublished document).

  • Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D., Watson, D., & Ilies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 574–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D., Watson, D., & Ilies, R. (2006). The dynamic process of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 74, 1421–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J., & Lavery, J. J. (1995). Subjective well-being and age. Social Indicators Research, 34, 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J., & McArdle, J. (1992). A practical guide and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 3, 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ahuvia, A. (2002). Materialistic values and well-being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knabe, A., & Raetzel, S. (2007). Quantifying the psychological costs of unemployment: The role of permanent income. SOEPpapers (German Socio-Economic Panel Study, DIW Berlin), 32. Retrieved August 5, 2008 at http://www.diw.de/soeppapers.

  • Knoop, R. (1989). Locus of control: A work-related variable? Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann, U., Little, T. D., & Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudional evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 15, 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, M. E. (1986). Locus of control in aging research: A case for multidimensional and domain-specific assessment. Psychology and Aging, 1, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, M. E. (2006). Perceived control over aging-related declines: Adaptive beliefs and behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 282–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke, G., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maij-de Meij, A. M., Kelderman, H., & van der Flier, H. (2008). Fitting a mixture item response theory model to personality questionnaire data: Characterizing latent classes and investigating possibilities for improving prediction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 611–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin, D. B., & Blascovitch, J. (1981). Effects of self-esteem and performance on future affective preferences and cognitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J., & Velherst, N. (1990). Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika, 55, 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehrke, M., Hulicka, I., & Morganti, J. (1980). Age differences in life satisfaction, locus of control, and self-concept. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 11, 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Stunkard, A. (1989). Personal control and health promotion. Social Science and Medicine, 28, 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (http://www.R-project.org).

  • Robinson, M. D., & Ryff, C. D. (1999). The role of self-deception in perceptions of past, present, and future happiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 75/92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (1997). Logistic mixture models. In W. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 449–463). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryckman, R., & Malikioski, M. (1975). Relationships between locus of control and chronological age. Psychological Reports, 36, 655–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawatzky, R., Ratner, P. A., Johnson, J. L., Kopec, J., & Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Sample heterogeneity and the measurement structure of the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Social Indicators Research, 94, 273–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahnemann, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Viele Gründe sprechen dagegen und trotzdem fühlen viele Menschen sich wohl: Das Paradox des subjektiven Wohlbefindens. [Many reasons speak against it, nevertheless most people are happy: The paradox of subjective well being]. Psychologische Rundschau, 51, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, U. M., Bluck, S., & Herzberg, P. (2003). Looking back and looking ahead: Adult age differences in consistency of diachronous ratings of subjective well-being. Psychology and Aging, 18, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, U. M., Marsiske, M., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Resilience and reserve capacity in later adulthood: Potentials and limits of development across the life span. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (Vol. 2: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 801–847). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, W., Okun, M., Haring, M., & Witter, R. (1983). Age differences in subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. In R. Light (Ed.), Evaluation studies. review annual (pp. 279–302). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Brown, J. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Brown, J. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Neter, E., & Wayment, H. A. (1995). Self-evaluation processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1278–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Davier, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2004). Partially observed mixtures of IRT models: An extension of the generalized partial-credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response models. Psychometrica, 54, 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 760–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 392–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolk, S. (1976). Situational constraint as a moderator of the locus of control-adjustment relationship. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 420–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolk, S., & Kurtz, J. (1975). Positive adjustment and involvement during aging and expectancy for internal control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H. (2008). Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting of satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis: Hierarchical linear modeling for within-subject data. Social Indicators Research, 86, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of differential item functioning (DIF) analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Heike Heidemeier & Ursula M. Staudinger

Authors
  1. Heike Heidemeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ursula M. Staudinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heike Heidemeier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heidemeier, H., Staudinger, U.M. Self-Evaluation Processes in Life Satisfaction: Uncovering Measurement Non-Equivalence and Age-Related Differences. Soc Indic Res 105, 39–61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9762-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9762-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation