Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

U.S. Food Insecurity Status: Toward a Refined Definition

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

United States Department of Agriculture defines food insecure as answering affirmatively to three or more food insecurity questions describing a household’s ability to acquire enough food. Households indicating low levels of food insecurity (one or two affirmative responses) are considered food secure. This paper compares the characteristics of households with one or two positive survey responses (termed marginally secure in this paper) to those with zero positive responses (food secure) and those with three or more positive responses (food insecure). The analysis utilizes Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement data to compare the characteristics and food purchasing of food secure, marginally secure and food insecure households using binomial and multinomial logistic regression and t-tests. Binomial logistic regression models indicate that grouping insecure and marginally secure households together does not change predictors of food insecurity. Multinomial logistic regression models suggest a three category definition of food insecurity is appropriate because there are distinctions among the three categories. There are significant differences in food spending across the groups. Prevalence of U.S. food insecurity and need for food assistance may be underestimated because marginally food secure households are considered food secure. The current measure fails to recognize that marginally secure households may experience poorer quality of life as do food insecure households.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Food Security Core Module questions go from the least severe food insecure conditions to the most severe. The first three questions are: (1) “We worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more.” (2) “The food that we bought just didn’t last and we didn’t have money to get more.” (3) “We couldn’t afford to eat balanced meals.” The responses for each question are: Was that often, sometimes, or never true for you in the last 12 months?

  2. An expert panel advised USDA to revise food security labels to be food secure (unchanged) and low food security (formerly food insecure) after an assessment of the measure. The most severe food insecurity, food insecurity with hunger, was renamed very low food security (National Research Council 2005, 2006). Because USDA continued to use the labels food secure and food insecure in recent reports (Nord et al. 2008), and because this paper does not include a discussion of food insecurity with hunger the former labels are used.

  3. Food Stamp Participation is used as a control variable in the analysis. For readers unfamiliar with the Food Stamp Program a description follows. The program provides funds for low-income households meeting certain eligibility requirements to purchase food at eligible retailers. Benefits are allocated based on household size and financial need and dispensed through government issued electronic debit cards that participants can use to make food purchases.

References

  • Alaimo, K., Olson, C. M., Frongillo, E. A., Jr, & Briefel, R. R. (2001). Food insufficiency, family income, and health in US preschool and school-aged children. American Journal of Public Health, 5, 781–786. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.5.781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. A. (1990). Core indicators of nutritional state for difficult-to-sample populations. The Journal of Nutrition, 120, 1559–1600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M., Bickel, G., & Carlson, S. (1998). Household food security in the United States in 1995: Results from the food security measurement project. Family Economics and Nutrition Review, 11, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, J., Currie, J., & Haider, S. (2004). Poverty, food insecurity, and nutritional outcomes in children and adults. Journal of Health Economics, 23, 839–862. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, G., Nord, M., Price, C., Hamilton, W., & Cook, J.(2000). Guide to measuring household food security: Revised 2000. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service and Office of Analysis, Budget, and Evaluation.

  • Carlson, S., Klein, B., Andrews, M., & Bickel, G.(1994). Conference on food security measurement and research: Papers and proceedings. Washington, D.C.: Food and Consumer Service U.S. Department of Agriculture and National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Carlson, S. J., Andrews, M. S., & Bickel, G. W. (1999). Measuring food insecurity and hunger in the United States: Development of a national benchmark measure and prevalence estimates. The Journal of Nutrition, 129, 510S–516S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L. B., Winkleby, M. A., & Radimer, K. L. (2001). Dietary intakes and serum nutrients differ between adults from food-insufficient and food-sufficient families: Third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988–1994. The Journal of Nutrition, 131, 1232–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunifon, R., & Kowaleski Jones, L. (2003). The influences of participation in the national school lunch program and food insecurity on child well-being. The Social Service Review, 77, 72–92. doi:10.1086/345705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frongillo, E. A., Jr. (1999). Validation of measures of food insecurity and hunger. The Journal of Nutrition, 129, 506S–509S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. L., Cook, J. T., Thompson, W. W., Buron, L. F., Frongillo, E. A., Jr., Olson, C. M., et al. (1997a). Household food security in the United States in 1995: Summary report of the food security measurement project. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Service, and Office of Analysis and Evaluation.

  • Hamilton, W. L., Cook, J. T., Thompson, W. W., Buron, L. F., Frongillo, E. A., Jr., Olson, C. M., et al. (1997b). Household food security in the United States in 1995: Technical report of the food security measurement project. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Service, and Office of Analysis and Evaluation.

  • Heflin, C. M., Siefert, K., & Williams, D. R. (2005). Food insufficiency and women’s mental health: Findings from a 3-year panel of welfare recipients. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1971–1982. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, A., Olson, C. M., & Frongillo, E. A., Jr. (1995). Validation of the Radimer/Cornell measures of hunger and food insecurity. The Journal of Nutrition, 125, 2793–2801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, A., Olson, C. M., & Frongillo, E. A., Jr. (1996). Relationship of hunger and food insecurity to food availability and consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 96, 1019–1024. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(96)00271-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (2001). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council.(2005). Measuring food insecurity and hunger: Phase 1 report. Panel to review the U.S. Department of Agricultures’ measurement of food insecurity and hunger. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • National Research Council.(2006). Food insecurity and hunger in the United States: An assessment of the measure. Panel to review the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s measurement of food insecurity and hunger, G.S. Wunderlich and J.L. Norwood, editors, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • Nord, M., Andrews, M., & Carlson, S.(2008). Household food security in the United States, 2007. Economic Research Report Number 66, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

  • Radimer, K. L., Olson, C. M., & Campbell, C. C. (1990). Development of indicators to assess hunger. The Journal of Nutrition, 120, 1544–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radimer, K. L., Olson, C. M., Greene, J. C., Campbell, C. C., & Habicht, J. P. (1992). Understanding hunger and developing indicators to assess it in women and children. Journal of Nutrition Education, 24, 36S–45S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D., & Oliveira, V. (1997). Nutrient intakes of individuals from food-insufficient households in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1956–1961. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.12.1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siefert, K., Heflin, C. M., Corcoran, M. E., & Williams, D. R. (2004). Food insufficiency and physical and mental health in a longitudinal survey of welfare recipients. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuff, J. E., Casey, P. H., Szeto, K. L., Gossett, J. M., Robbins, J. M., Simpson, P. M., et al. (2004). Household food insecurity is associated with adult health status. The Journal of Nutrition, 134, 2330–2335.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA.(2007). Food security in the United States: Measuring household food security. Retrieved November 29, 2007, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodSecurity/measurement.htm.

  • Vozoris, N. T., & Tarasuk, V. S. (2003). Household food insufficiency is associated with poorer health. The Journal of Nutrition, 133, 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alisha Judith Coleman-Jensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman-Jensen, A.J. U.S. Food Insecurity Status: Toward a Refined Definition. Soc Indic Res 95, 215–230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9455-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9455-4

Keywords

Navigation