Skip to main content
Log in

Time Use and Living Standards

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Abraham, K., & Mackie, C. (2004). Beyond the market. Designing nonmarket accounts for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2006). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12082.

  • Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (2004). The rush hour: The quality of leisure time and gender equity. In N. Folbre & M. Bittman (Eds.), Family time: The social organization of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2007). Activity, proximity or responsibility: Measuring parental childcare time. In N. Folbre & M. Bittman (Eds.), Family time, the social organization of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, K. (2005). Welfare as we [don’t] know it: A review and feminist critique of welfare reform research. Feminist Economics, 10(2), 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, K., England, P., Ross, K., Smeeding, T., & McLanahan, S. (2001). Gender inequality in poverty in affluent nations: The role of single motherhood and the state. In K. Vleminckx & T. Smeeding (Eds.), Child wellbeing, child poverty and child policy in modern nations (pp. 199–219). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citro, C., & Michael, R. (Eds.). (1995). Measuring poverty. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, D. (1998). The unequal work day: A long term view. American Economic Review, 88(2), 330–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, R. (1989). The total incomes system of accounts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (2008a). Valuing children. Rethinking the economics of the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (2008b). Inequality and time use in the household. In W. Salverda, B. Nolan, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), The oxford handbook of economic inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N., & Wagman, B. (1993). Counting housework: New estimates of real product in the U.S., 1800–1860. The Journal of Economic History, 53(2), 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N., & Yoon, J. (2007). What is child care? Lessons from time use surveys of major English-speaking countries. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(3), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Schettkat, R. (2002). Marketization of production and the U.S.–Europe employment gap. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8797.

  • Goodin, R. E., Rice, J. M., Parpo, A., & Eriksson, L. (2008). Discretionary time: A new measure of freedom. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., Seshadri, A., & Youkoglu, M. (2005). Engines of liberation. Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, T. F., & Stafford, F. (1985). Process benefits and the problem of joint production. In T. F. Juster & F. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ISR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, P., & Muhajarine, N. (2008). Quality of life research: New challenges and new opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 85, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81, 999–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2000). Why ‘more work for mother’? Knowledge and household behavior, 1870–1945. Journal of Economic History, 60(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, S. A., & Burton, P. S. (2007). Families, time, and money in Canada, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Review of Income and Wealth, 53(3), 460–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, V. (2008). Time spent in home production in the 20th century: New estimates from old data. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13985.

  • Ramey, V., & Francis, N. (2006). A century of work and leisure. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12264.

  • Reid, M. (1934). Economics of household production. New York: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Part, PA: Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosnick, D., & Weisbrot, M. (2006). Are shorter work hours good for the environment? A comparison of US and European energy consumption. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1993). The overworked American. The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox, manuscript. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, available at http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/betseys/papers/Happiness.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2008.

  • Vickery, C. (1977). The time poor: A new look at poverty. Journal of Human Resources, 12(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagman, B., & Folbre, N. (1996). Household services and economic growth in the U.S., 1870–1930. Feminist Economics, 2(1), 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Folbre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Folbre, N. Time Use and Living Standards. Soc Indic Res 93, 77–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9407-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9407-4

Keywords

Navigation