Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of Life in Cities: Setting up Criteria for Amman-Jordan

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the interest grew in research on measuring the “quality of life” (QOL) in cities. This interest comes from the success QOL measurement achieved in understanding communities’ needs, tracking changes in different aspects of life and assessing the most desired types of future development among citizens. This research highlights the importance of measuring QOL in Jordan. It examines the opportunity and applicability of carrying out QOL measurement studies in Amman, the capital city. It outlines different scopes, visions and approaches that can be used to study and measure QOL and the most suitable mechanism that can work firmly. A professional top–bottom approach was used for that. Thirty-three experts with different backgrounds were interviewed in order to determine the appropriate scopes and visions for studying QOL, define the most significant aspects affecting QOL in Amman, and define the appropriate domains to be studied. Results were analyzed, limitations were defined and the final set of representative domains was stated. Domains were ranked according to their relevance and the important -underneath- aspects were defined in the form of models, each representing a certain domain. The paper attempts by the end to set the stage for setting up criteria for measuring QOL in Amman and to open the way for future QOL research to take place in Jordan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assessing the Quality of Community Life—Detroit Area Study 2001. http://www.tcaup.umich.edu/workfolio/DAS2001. Accessed Oct 2003.

  • Bloom, D., Craig, P., & Malaney, P. (2001). The quality of life in rural Asia. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal, S., & Imura, H. (2001). Policy based indicator systems: Emerging debates and lessons. Asano, Kokurakita-Ku, Kitakyushu, Japan: Institute of Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).

    Google Scholar 

  • European System of Social Indicators (EUSI). http://www.gesis.org/en/social_monitoring/social indicators/EU_reporting/eusi.htm. Accessed Oct 2003.

  • Ferriss, A. L. (2000). Measuring the domains of quality of life. Atlanta: Department of Sociology, Emory University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, P., Berry, D., & Heintz, T. (2002). Sustainability and quality of life indicators: Toward the integration of economic, social and environmental measures. The Journal of Social Health, 1(4), 274–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. (2001). Local indicators of quality of life: A preliminary Look at Pikes Peak Region. Colorado Springs: Center for Colorado Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R. (2001). Quality of life measurement systems for developing countries. In Proceedings of the China Consumer Economics Research Association. Graduate School of Management, University of California.

  • Hagerty, M. R, & Land, K. C. (2002). Constructing summary indices of social well-being: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.

  • Henderson, H., Lickerman, J., & Flynn, P. (2000). Calvert-Henderson quality of life indicators: A new tool for assessing national trends. Betheseda, USA: Calvert Group, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, S. (2001). Conceptualizing and measuring quality of life for national policy. FIEF Working Paper Series.

  • Jones, A., & Riseborough, M. (2002a). A guide to doing quality of life research. University of Birmingham, UK: Center of Urban & Regional Studies, School of Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Riseborough, M. (2002b). Comparing quality of life research—International lessons. UK: Center of Urban & Regional Studies, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan Department of Statistics. (2003). Statistical yearbook (Issue No. 53), Amman, Jordan.

  • Land, K. (1992). Social indicators and quality of life. In E. F. Borgotta & M. L. Borgotta (Eds.), A revision to the entry. USA: Encyclopedia of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Peng, A, & Xing, S. (2001). The quality of urban life in mainland China. Paper Presented at the Joint Conference of the Asian Consumer and Family Economics Association and the China Consumer Economics Research Association.

  • Luger, M. L. (1996). Quality of life differences and urban and regional outcomes: A review. Housing Policy Debate, 7(4), 749–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W. (2002). Measuring quality of community life using subjective and objective indicators: The Metro Detroit experience. Baltimore, Maryland: ACSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, M. (2000). Review of Canadian quality of life survey data. Background Paper, Canadian Policy Research Network.

  • Myers, D. (1987). Community relevant measurement of quality of life: A focus on local trends. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P. (2001). Urban indicators for managing cities. In V. De Villa & M. Westfall (Eds.), Urban indicators for managing cities: Cities data book. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality of Life Concepts: The Quality of Life Model. http://www.untoronto.ca/qol/concepts.htm. Accessed April 2003.

  • Quality of Life Indicators, Survey of the Darnall Action Area. October–November 2002. http://www.tcaup.umich.edu/workfolio/DAS2001. Accessed April 2003.

  • Quality of Life in Big Cities of New Zealand. http://www.bigcities.gov.nz. Accessed June 2003.

  • Quality of Life in Big Cities of New Zealand. (2001). Final Report, Print Strategies United, Auckland, New Zealand.

  • Quality of Life in Jacksonville: Indicators for Progress. (2001). Reference Report. Prepared by Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce and the City of Jacksonville by the Jacksonville Community Council Inc.

  • Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research—A critical introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Quality of Life in Prince George (1997). http://web.unbc.ca/isre/1997/index.html. Accessed June 2003.

  • Schmitt, R. B., & Janckowitsch, B. (1999). Systems of social indicators and social reporting: The state of the art. EU Reporting Working Paper No. 1, Center for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA), Social Indicators Department, Mannheim.

  • Shookner, M. (1998). A quality of life index for Ontario. Presented at the Conference on the State of Living Standards and the Quality of life in Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

  • Wegener, A., & Huner, A. (2001). Quality of life indicator programs for strategic management in local government. Cities of Tomorrow Expert Workshop.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hikmat H. Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ali, H.H., Malkawi, F.K. & Al-Betawi, Y.N. Quality of Life in Cities: Setting up Criteria for Amman-Jordan. Soc Indic Res 93, 407–432 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9333-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9333-5

Keywords

Navigation