Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the Structural Validity of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales Across Two Samples

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ryff’s (1989b) Psychological Well-Being (PWB) scales measure six related constructs of human functioning. The present paper examined the validity of Ryff’s 6-factor PWB model, using data from a life events study (N = 401) and an organisational climate study (N = 679). Previous validation studies, using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), have identified alternative PWB models, but limitations include the use of shorter scale versions with items relating to a number of life domains within the same PWB factor, and failure to examine the influence of participants’ socio-demographic characteristics on PWB. In this study, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) mostly found consistency in the PWB items and structure between the two studies whereby a 3-factor model delineated between items relating to Autonomy, Positive Relations and a super-ordinate factor comprising the other PWB factors. Using CFA, Goodness of Fit indices reached acceptable levels for the adjusted PWB model identified by the EFA, whilst differences between adjusted models of PWB previously identified in the literature were hardly evident. Post-hoc analysis by gender demonstrated socio-demographic effects on the structure and items that comprise PWB. Further development of PWB measures is needed to reflect its hierarchical and multi-dimensional nature. In the scales’ current form, the construct validation of the PWB factors will continue to be problematic and will fail to adequately evaluate the nature and impact of PWB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbot, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E. J., & Croudace, T. J. (2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological wellbeing items in a UK cohort sample of women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 76. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aish, A. M., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality & Quantity, 24, 405–426. doi:10.1007/BF00152013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. B. (1979). The self-concept theory in measurement, development and behavior. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J., Marshall, V. W., Ryff, C. D., & Wheaton, B. (2001). Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian study of health and aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 13(Supp 1), 79–90. doi:10.1017/S1041610202008013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327–346. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0903_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollan, C. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 4 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava, G. M., Ruini, C., Rafanelli, C., Finos, L., Conti, S., & Grandi, S. (2004). Six-year outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for prevention of recurrent depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1872–1876. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.10.1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. (2000). Subjective well-being: Revisions to dynamic equilibrium theory using national panel data and panel regression methods. Social Indicators Research, 79, 369–403. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-5381-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. J. (1989). Personality, life events and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holgado-Tello, F. P., Carrasco-Ortiz, M. A., Victroria del Barrio-Gandara, M., & Chacon-Moscoso, S. (2007). Factor analysis of the big five questionnaire using polychoric correlations in children. Quality and Quantity, 202–214. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9085-3.

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago: SSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, G. J., & Kozma, A. (2002). The construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 57, 171–190. doi:10.1023/A:1014451725204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimising well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, N. F., & Lambert, J. D. (1998). Marital status continuity and change among young and midlife adults: Longitudinal effects on psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 652–686. doi:10.1177/019251398019006001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self Description Questonnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 35–55. doi:10.1177/016502548901200102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., Keyes, C. L. M., & Hughes, D. L. (2004a). Psychological well-being in MIDUS: Profiles of ethnic/racial diversity and life course uniformity. In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at mid-life, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on mental health and development: Studies on successful midlife development (pp. 398–424). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., Singer, B. H., & Love, G. D. (2004b). Positive health: Connecting well-being with biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1383–1394. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smider, N. A., Essex, M. J., & Ryff, C. D. (1996). Adaptation of community relocation: The interactive influence of psychological resources and contextual factors. Psychology and Aging, 11(2), 362–372. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.11.2.362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35, 1080–1102. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, K. W., Hauser, R. M., & Freese, J. (2006). Bad news indeed for Ryff’s six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1120–1131. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dierendonck, D. (2004). The construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 629–643. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dierendonck, D., Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., & Moreno-Jiménez, B. (2007). Ryff’s six-factor model of psychological well-being, a Spanish exploration. Social Indicators Research, . doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9174-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self-concept: A critical survey of pertinent research literature. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants from both studies, Mr. Ross Bool and the Technical Services staff for organizing the online questionnaires, and Dr. Tim Windsor for feedback on an earlier manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

    Richard A. Burns & M. Anthony Machin

Authors
  1. Richard A. Burns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Anthony Machin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Burns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, R.A., Machin, M.A. Investigating the Structural Validity of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales Across Two Samples. Soc Indic Res 93, 359–375 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9329-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9329-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation