Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Youth Development: A Nonparametric Cross-Country ‘Youth Welfare Index’

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops an empirical methodology for the construction of a synthetic multi-dimensional cross-country comparison of the performance of governments around the world in improving the livelihood of their younger population. The devised ‘Youth Welfare Index’ is based on the nonparametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology and allows for cross-country benchmarking and comparison over time. The value added of the youth index is to produce country-specific rankings and trace performance evolution with respect to indicators solely centered on youth, unlike other development indicators like the Human Development Index (HDI) which bundles many social and development indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Atkinson et al. (2004) for an extensive discussion of the EU’s social inclusion indicators.

References

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation: Contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 51–65. doi:10.1023/A:1023903525276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2004). Indicators and targets for social inclusion in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 47–75. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00476.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input. Output and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414. doi:10.2307/1913388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye, L., & Kuosmanen, T. (2004). Benchmarking sustainable development: A synthetic meta-index approach. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Perspectives on inequality, poverty and human well-being. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., & Van Puyenbroeck, T. (2004). Legitimately diverse, yet comparable: Synthesizing social inclusion performance in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(5), 919–955. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00535.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Reference guide to On Front, EMQ. www.emq.com.

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaim, O., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2001). An economic approach to achievement and improvement indexes. Social Indicators Research, 56, 91–118. doi:10.1023/A:1011837827659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jad M. Chaaban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaaban, J.M. Measuring Youth Development: A Nonparametric Cross-Country ‘Youth Welfare Index’. Soc Indic Res 93, 351–358 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9328-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9328-2

Keywords

Navigation