Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding Persistent Food Insecurity: A Paradox of Place and Circumstance

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survey data from a U.S. Department of Agriculture funded multi-state longitudinal project revealed a paradox where rural low-income families from states considered prosperous were persistently more food insecure than similar families from less prosperous states. An examination of quantitative and qualitative data found that families in the food insecure states were more likely to experience greater material hardship and incur greater housing costs than families in the food secure states. Families in the food insecure states, however, did not have lower per capita median incomes or lower life satisfaction than those in the food secure states. A wide range of strategies to cope with food insecurity reported by families in both food insecure and food secure states was examined using the Family Ecological Systems Theory. Families in the food insecure states used several risky consumption reduction strategies such as curbing their appetite and using triage. Families in the food secure states, on the other hand, employed positive techniques involving their human capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To determine prosperous states, we ranked the states in our data set according to their infant mortality rate, percent of residents with bachelor’s degree, and fiscal capacity index. States with high fiscal capacity have a relatively high capability to cover their expenditure needs using their own resources while those with low fiscal capacity have a low level of revenue-raising capacity given what it would cost to provide a standard set of public services to their citizens (Rueben et al. 2006). Based on these indicators, California, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Oregon may be considered prosperous while Louisiana, Michigan, and Nebraska may be considered less prosperous.

  2. USDA describes ranges of food insecurity as “low food security” and “very low food security.” These labels replaced “food insecurity without hunger” and “food insecurity with hunger” respectively in 2006. (For the USDA’s new labels see: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodSecurity/labels.htm). We have used the terms “food insecure”, “food insecurity”, “food insufficiency”, and “food inadequacy” interchangeably as overall terms to describe the general state of families who experience either low food security or very low food security.

  3. For the complete project description, see (Bauer 2004, pp. 1–4) and http://fsos.cehd.umn.edu/projects/rfs.html.

  4. For purposes of this study, families were considered persistently food insecure if they were food insecure in all three waves of data collection.

References

  • Alaimo, K., Olson, C. M., Frongillo, E. A., & Briefel, R. R. (2001). Food insufficiency, family income, and health in US preschool and school-aged children. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 781–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartfeld, J., & Dunifon, R. (2006). State-level predictors of food insecurity among households with children. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 921–942. doi:10.1002/pam.20214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. W. (2004). Basebook report. Low-income rural families: Tracking their well-being and functioning in the context of welfare reform. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from University of Minnesota, Rural Families Speak Web site: http://fsos.cehd.umn.edu/projects/rfs/publications.html.

  • Berry, A., Katras, M. J., Sano, Y., Lee, J., & Bauer, J. W. (2008). Job volatility of rural, low-income mothers: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 5–22. doi:10.1007/s10834-007-9096-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, S. (1993). Human ecology theory. In W. J. Doherty, P. G. Boss, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 419–448). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M., & Whiren, A. P. (1984). The family of the handicapped: An ecological model for policy and practice. Family Relations, 33, 5–12. doi:10.2307/584584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, P., Goolsby, S., Berkowitz, C., Frank, D., Cook, J., Cutts, D., et al. (2004). Maternal depression, changing public assistance, food security, and child health status. Pediatrics, 113, 298–304. doi:10.1542/peds.113.2.298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Kim, M., & Ohls, J. (2006). Hunger in America: National report prepared for America’s Second Harvest. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.hungerinamerica.org/export/sites/hungerinamerica/about_the_study/A2HNationalReport.pdf.

  • Connell, C. L., Yadrick, K., Hinton, A., & Su, J. (2001). Food insufficiency and the use of food assistance programs in the South. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from Mississippi State University, Southern Rural Development Center Web site: http://srdc.msstate.edu/focusareas/health/fa/fa_1.pdf.

  • Dolan, E. M., Seiling, S. B., & Glesner, T. (2006, February). Making it work: Rural low-income women in service jobs. Paper presented at the Eastern Family Economics and Resource Management Association Conference, Knoxville, TN. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://mrupured.myweb.uga.edu/conf/5.pdf.

  • Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. E., Weber, B., & Bernell, S. (2006). Identifying factors that influence state-specific hunger rates in the US: A simple analytic method for understanding a persistent problem. Social Indicators Research, 81, 579–595. doi:10.1007/s11205-006-0026-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register. (2005). Annual update of the HHS poverty guidelines. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/05fedreg.htm.

  • Hamelin, A., Habicht, J., & Beaudry, M. (1999). Food insecurity: Consequences for the household and broader social implications. The Journal of Nutrition, 129, 525S–528S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., Summers, G., Pickering, K., & Richards, P. (2002). The short term impacts of welfare reform in persistently poor rural areas. In: B. A. Weber, G. J. Duncan, & L. A. Whitener (Eds.), Rural dimensions of welfare reform (pp. 375–410). Kalamazoo, Michigan: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

  • Huddleston-Casas, C., & Braun, B. (2006). Rural families speak out III: Laboring towards economic self-sufficiency. (Webcast). Retrieved December 20, 2007, from University of Minnesota, Rural Families Speak Web site: http://breeze5.umn.edu/maypresentation.

  • Kirkpatrick, S., & Tarasuk, V. (2003). The relationship between low income and household food expenditure patterns in Canada. Public Health Nutrition, 6, 589–897. doi:10.1079/PHN2003517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Jensen, L. (2002). Rural America in transition: Poverty and welfare in the turn of the twenty-first century. In B. A. Weber, G. J. Duncan, & L. A. Whitener (Eds.), Rural dimensions of welfare reform (pp. 77–110). Kalamazoo, Michigan: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989). Poverty and the distribution of material hardship. The Journal of Human Resources, 24, 88–114. doi:10.2307/145934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, L., Glanville, T., Raine, K. D., Dayle, J. B., Anderson, B., & Battaglia, N. (2003). Do low-income lone mothers compromise their nutrition to feed their children? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168, 686–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1999). Economic hardship across the life course. American Sociological Review, 64, 548–569. doi:10.2307/2657255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molcho, M., Gaghainn, S. N., Kelly, C., Friel, S., & Kelleher, C. (2007). Food poverty and health among school children in Ireland: Findings from the health behaviour in school-aged children (HSBC) study. Public Health Nutrition, 10, 264–370. doi:10.1017/S1368980007226072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, P. A., O’Neill, C., Tiller, V. V., & Smith, J. (2002). The challenge of compliance: Food security in rural households affected by welfare reform. Food assistance needs of the South’s vulnerable population. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from Mississippi State University, Southern Rural Development Center Web site: http://srdc.msstate.edu/focusareas/health/fa/fa_5_monroe.pdf.

  • Nord, M., Andrews, M., & Carlson, S (2005). Household food security in the United States, 2005. Economic Research Report No. 29. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/ERR29/.

  • OECD. (n.d.). OECD.stat extracts. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/default.aspx.

  • Parra-Cardona, J. R., Bulock, L. A., Imig, D. R., Villarruel, F. A., & Gold, S. J. (2006). Trabajando duro todos los dias: Learning from the life experiences of Mexican-origin migrant families. Family Relations, 55, 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00409.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, S. A., Arcury, T. A., Early, J., Tapia, J., & Davis, J. D. (2004). Household and food security among migrant and seasonal Latino farmworkers in North Carolina. Public Health Reports, 119, 568–576. doi:10.1016/j.phr.2004.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radimer, K. L., Olson, C. M., & Campbell, C. (1990). Development of indicators to assess hunger. The Journal of Nutrition, 120, 1544–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribar, D.C., & Hamrick, K. S. (2003). Dynamics of poverty and food sufficiency. Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report No. 36. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/FANRR36/.

  • Rueben, K., Hoo, S., & Yilmaz, Y. (2006). Fiscal capacity of states, fiscal 2002. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, Tax Policy Center Web site: http://www.urban.org/publications/1001039.html.

  • Sarlio-Lahteenkorva, S., & Lahelma, E. (2001). Food insecurity is associated with past and present economic disadvantage and body mass index. The Journal of Nutrition, 131, 2880–2884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapogna, J., Suter, A., Nord, M., & Leachman, M. (2004, October). Explaining variations in state hunger rates. Paper presented at the 2004 Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Atlanta GA.

  • Tarasuk, V. (2001). Household food insecurity with hunger is associated with women’s food intakes, health and household circumstances. The Journal of Nutrition, 131, 2670–2676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, M. S., Peerson, J., Love, B., Achterberg, C., & Murphy, S. P. (2001). Food insecurity is positively related to overweight in women. The Journal of Nutrition, 131, 1738–1745.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2007). 2007/2008 Human development report. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from United Nations Development Programme Web site: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/hdr_20072008_en_complete.pdf.

  • Vailas, L. I., Nitzke, S. A., Becker, M., & Gast, J. (1998). Risk indicators for malnutrition are associated inversely with quality of life for participants in meal programs for older adults. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 548–553. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00123-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, B., & Jensen, L. (2004). Poverty and place: A critical review of the rural poverty literature. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from Working paper series, Rural Poverty Research Center Web site: http://www.rprconline.org/WorkingPapers/WP0403.pdf.

  • Whitaker, R. C., Phillips, S. M., & Orzol, S. M. (2006). Food insecurity and the risks of depression and anxiety in mothers and behavior problems in their preschool-aged children. Pediatrics, 118, 859–868. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by USDA/CSREES/NRICGP Grant Number 2001-35401-10215 & 2002-35401-11591, 2004-35401-14938. Data were collected in conjunction with the cooperative multi-state research project, NC-223/NC-1011, “Rural Low-Income Families: Monitoring Their Well-being and Functioning in the Context of Welfare Reform.” Cooperating states are California, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, and Oregon. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of undergraduate research assistants, Peter St. Marie and Thomas Martin, both at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and Seohee Son, graduate student at the University of Minnesota.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheila Mammen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mammen, S., Bauer, J.W. & Richards, L. Understanding Persistent Food Insecurity: A Paradox of Place and Circumstance. Soc Indic Res 92, 151–168 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9294-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9294-8

Keywords

Navigation