Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement and socio-demographic variation of social capital in a large population-based survey

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives The main objective of this study was to describe the variation of individual social capital according to socio-demographic factors, and to develop a suitable way to measure social capital for this purpose. The similarity of socio-demographic variation between the genders was also assessed. Data and methods The study applied cross-sectional data from the national Finnish Health 2000 survey (n = 8,028) which represents the adult population, aged 30 years and over. Several variables indicating social capital were condensed to dimensions on the basis of factor analysis. Participants were categorized into tertiles in each dimension of social capital by means of factor scores. The multinomial logistic regression model was used to produce the adjusted prevalences for the dimensions of social capital according to socio-demographic categories (age, gender, education, living arrangements, income, and type of region). Results Three dimensions of social capital were distinguished: social support, social participation and networks, and trust and reciprocity. Age had an inverse association with social support as well as participation and networks, and a curvilinear association between age and trust and reciprocity, the oldest age groups showing the highest level of trust. Married persons and those in the highest educational and income groups tended to have more social capital than other persons. Residents of urban and rural regions did not systematically differ from each other in their level of social capital although residents of urban regions participated less and showed less trust than people living in semi-urban or rural regions. Social support varied significantly with gender. The decline of social support by age was steeper in women than in men. Social participation and networks increased with education, the gradient appearing steeper among men. The difference between married and cohabiting men was substantial compared to women when it came to trust. Conclusions People who are young, married, educated, and well-off have plenty of social capital. This information might help various services to concentrate the actions on the people in danger of social exclusion. Our results also form a basis for the future by allowing the changes in social capital to be examined over time and over different studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alanen, A., & Niemeläinen, S. (2003). Sosiaalisen pääoman subjektiivisten mittareiden etsintää – luottamus, ystävyyssuhteet ja toiminta aluetasolla Suomessa. (In Finnish, abstract in English). [Search of subjective measures of social capital – trust, friendships and participation at the regional level in Finland.] Available from http://www.tilastokeskus.fi/org/tut/dthemes/papers/sospaa.pdf.

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aromaa, A., Heliövaara, M., Impivaara, O., Knekt, P., Maatela, J., Joukamaa, M., Klaukka, T., Lehtinen, V., Melkas, T., Mälkiä, E., Nyman, K., Paunio, I., Reunanen, A., Sievers, K., Kalimo, E., & Kallio, V. (1989). Health, functional limitations and need for care in Finland. Basic results from the Mini-Finland Health Survey (in Finnish with English summary). Helsinki: Publications of the Social Insurance Institution AL:32.

  • Aromaa, A., & Koskinen, S. (Eds.). (2004). Health and functional capacity in Finland. Baseline results of the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Helsinki: Publications of the National Public Health Institute B12. Available also at http://www.ktl.fi/health2000.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richards (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, P., & Onyx, J. (1998). Measuring social capital in five communities in NSW. Available from http://www.mapl.com.au/A2.htm.

  • Bygren, L. O., Benson, B., & Johansson, S.- E. (1996). Attendance at cultural events, reading books or periodicals, and making music or singing in a choir as determinants for survival: Swedish interview survey of living conditions. British Medical Journal, 313, 1577–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, S. (2005). Measurement of social capital. Reference document for public policy research, development, and evaluation, PRI project. Policy Research Initiative, Canada, pp. 7–12.

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Gaag, M. (2005). The measurement of individual social capital. Ph.D. dissertation, Groningen.

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2001). The formation of social capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graubard, B. I., & Korn, E. L. (1999). Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics, 55, 652–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, G., Grimsley, M., Suokas, A., Prescott, M., Jowitt, T., & Linacre, R. (2000). Social capital, health and economy in South Yorkshire coalfield communities. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V. N., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring social capital. An integrated questionnaire. World Bank Working paper no. 18, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • Harper, R. (2002). The measurement of social capital in the United Kingdom. Office for National Statistics. Available from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/52/2382339.pdf.

  • Harpham, T., Grant, E., & Thomas, E. (2002). Measuring social capital within health surveys: Key issues. Health Policy and Planning, 17, 106–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukkala, A. (2002). Depressive symptoms and hostility in relation to socioeconomic status, smoking cessation and obesity. Academic dissertation, Publications of the National Public Health Institute A14.

  • Hjøllund, L., & Svendsen, G. T. (2000). Social capital: A standard method of measurement. Working papers 00-9, Aarhus School of Business, Dept. of Economics.

  • Hyyppä, M. T., Mäki, J., Impivaara, O., & Aromaa, A. (2006). Leisure participation predicts survival: A population-based study in Finland. Health Promotion International, 21, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iisakka, L. (2004). Sosiaalisen pääoman erot maiden ja sosioekonomisten ryhmien välisessä vertailussa [The differences in social capital in the comparison of countries and socioeconomic categories]. Master’s thesis, The Department of Social Policy, University of Helsinki (in Finnish).

  • Iisakka, L., & Alanen, A. (2006). Social capital in Finland: Internal and international background. In L. Iisakka (Ed.), Social capital in Finland. Statistical review (To be published in English: Statistics Finland, living conditions, Helsinki).

  • Julkunen, J., Salonen, R., Kaplan, G. A., Chesney, M. A., & Salonen, J. T. (1994). Hostility and the progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Psychomatic Medicine, 56, 519–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income inequality and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1491–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kemenade, S. (2003). Social capital as a health determinant. How is it defined? Health Canada, working paper 02-07.

  • Laiho, J. (2004). Katoanalyysi [Analysis of non-response] (in Finnish), In J. Laiho & T. Nieminen (Eds.), Terveys 2000 -tutkimus. Aikuisväestön haastatteluaineiston tilastollinen laatu. Otanta-asetelma, tiedonkeruu, vastauskato ja estimointi- ja analyysiasetelma. [in Health 2000 Examination Survey. Statistical quality of the survey data on adulta population. Sampling design, data collection, non-response, estimation and analysis design, pp. 28–47] (Research reports 239, Statistics Finland, Helsinki).

  • Lee, J. (1981). Covariance adjustment of rates based on the multiple logistic regression model. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 34, 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, M. (2005). Social capital, the miniaturization of community and high alcohol consumption: A population-based study. Alcohol and alcoholism, 40, 556–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martelin, T., Nieminen, T., Heikkilä, M., Kainulainen, S., Kauppinen, T., Lahelma, E., Mannila, S., & Notkola, V. (2004). Sociodemographic factors and living conditions. In A. Aromaa & S. Koskinen (Eds.), Health and functional capacity in Finland. Baseline results of the health 2000 health examination survey (pp. 24–32). Helsinki: Publications of the National Public Health Institute B12.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital (pp. 39-41). Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS/Office of National Statistics. (2001). Social capital. Matrix of surveys. Social analysis and Reporting Division, October 2001. Available from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/socialcapital/downloads/soccapmatrix.pdf.

  • Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Sources of social capital. In I. Winter (Ed.), Social capital and public policy in Australia (pp. 105–134). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W. (2006). Social capital: An individual or collective resource for health? Social Science & Medicine, 62, 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Triangle Institute. (2001). SUDAAN user’s manual, release 8.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F. (2005). Social capital as social networks. A new framework for measurement. Working paper no. 83, Dipartimento di Economia pubblica, Universita’ degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, p. 11.

  • Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 44, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS online doc. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCCBS, Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey. (2001). Available from http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/saguaro/communitysurvey/results.html.

  • Schellenberg, G. (2004). 2003 General social survey on social engagement, cycle 17: An overview of findings. Catalogue no. 89-598-XIE, Statistics Canada.

  • Simpura, J. (2002). Sosiaalista pääomaa mittaamassa. In P. Ruuskanen (Ed.), Sosiaalinen pääoma ja hyvinvointi. Näkökulmia sosiaali- ja terveysaloille (p. 203). Finland: PS-kustannus, Keuruu [Measuring social capital. In P. Ruuskanen (Ed.), Social capital and well-being. Viewpoints to social and health fields (p. 203). Finland: PS-kustannus, Keuruu] (in Finnish).

  • Spellerberg, A. (1997). Towards a framework for the measurement of social capital. In D. Robison (Ed.), Social capital and policy development. Victoria, University of Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.

  • Stone, W. (2001). Measuring social capital. Towards a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life. Research paper no. 24, February 2001.

  • Stone, W., & Hughes, J. (2002). Social capital. Empirical meaning and measurement validity. Research paper no. 27, June. Australian Institute of Family Studies.

  • Subramanian, S. V., Kim, D. J., & Kawachi, I. (2002). Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin on the New York Academy of Medicine, 79, S21–S34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukewich, N., & Norris, D. (2005). National experiences and international harmonization in social capital measurement: A beginning. Available from http://www.stat.fi/sienagroup2005/douglas1.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Senior Statistician Aku Alanen for sharing his knowledge on social capital during the planning and writing process. This work was funded by a grant from the Academy of Finland (no. 207447).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarja Nieminen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nieminen, T., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S. et al. Measurement and socio-demographic variation of social capital in a large population-based survey. Soc Indic Res 85, 405–423 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9102-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9102-x

Keywords

Navigation