Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective Well-Being: The Constructionist Point of View. A Longitudinal Study to Verify The Predictive Power of Top-Down Effects and Bottom-Up Processes

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the constructionist point of view applied to Subjective Well-Being (SWB), five hypotheses were advanced about the predictive power of the top-down effects and bottom-up processes over a five years period. The sample consisted of 297 respondents, which represent the Italian sample of a European longitudinal survey; the first phase was conducted in 1995 and the follow-up in 2000. Satisfaction judgments were collected on Overall Life Satisfaction (OLS) and on seven Life Facet Satisfaction (LFS) domains. The top-down effects were measured using a method derived from the constructionist point of view. Life conditions, which represent the bottom-up processes, were gathered by structured questionnaire and were optimized by a factor analyses. A stepwise regression was performed in each satisfaction judgment to test the five hypotheses, which were confirmedwith only few exceptions. The results revealed that the top-down effects were a significant predictor in all satisfaction judgments, especially in OLS, where it was the strongest predictor. Life conditions (bottom-up factors) were less strong predictors than the top-down effects, but they became strong predictors if they were gathered at the same time as satisfaction judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P.H. Blaney (1986) ArticleTitle’Affect and memory: A review’ Psychological Bulletin 99 229–246 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0033-2909.99.2.229 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC2sfhsVw%3D Occurrence Handle3515383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • E. Diener (1984) ArticleTitle’Subjective well-being’ Psychological Bulletin. 95 542–575 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0033-2909.95.3.542 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimD3MjjvVM%3D Occurrence Handle6399758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • E. Diener (1994) ArticleTitle’Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities’ Social Indicators Research. 31 103–157 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01207052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Diener C.K. Napa Scollon S. Oishi V. Dzokoto E.M. Suh (2000) ArticleTitle’Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts’ Journal of Happiness Studies 1 159–176 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010031813405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Ehrhardt W.E. Saris R. Veenhoven (2000) ArticleTitle’Stability of life-satisfaction over time’ Journal of Happiness Studies. 1 177–205 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010084410679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Emmons E. Diener (1985) ArticleTitle’Factor predicting satisfaction judgment: A comparative examination’ Social Indicators Research. 16 157–168 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00574615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Fox D. Kahneman (1992) ArticleTitle’Correlation, causes and heuristics in survey of life satisfaction’ Social Indicator Research. 27 221–234

    Google Scholar 

  • V.F. Guidano (1987) The Complexity of Self Guilford New York

    Google Scholar 

  • F.A. Hayek (1978) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • H.J. Hippler N. Schwarz S. Sudman (Eds) (1987) Social Information Processing and SurveyMethodology Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kahneman P. Slovic A. Tversky (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G.A. Kelly (1955) The Psychology of Persona Constructs Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, F., L. Spazzafumo, F. Marcellini and C. Gagliardi: 1999, ’The topdown/ bottom-up controversy from a constructionist approach. A method for measuring top-down effects applied to a sample of older people’, Social Indicators Research 48, pp. 187-216

  • K.H. Pribram (1982) ’Reflections on the place of brain in the ecology of mind’ W.B. Weimer D.S Palermo (Eds) Cognition and the Symbolic Processes, Vol. 2 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ross A. Eyman N. Kishchuck (1986) ’Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview’ N.J. Roese J.M. Olson (Eds) What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • A.F. Sameroff (1982) ’Development and the dialectic: The need for a system approach’ W.A. Collins (Eds) The Concept of Development Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sherpenzeel (1995) A Question of Quality: Evaluating Survey Question by Multi-trait - Multimethod Studies Nimmo Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Schuman S. Presser (1981) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question form. Wording and Context Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Schwarz G. Clore (1983) ArticleTitle’Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being Informative and directive functions of affective states’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45 513–523 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0022-3514.45.4.884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Schwarz F. Strack (1991) ’Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being’ F. Strack M. Argyle N. Schwarz (Eds) SubjectiveWell-being Pergamon Oxford 27–48

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Schwarz F. Strack (1999) ’Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications’ D. Kahneman E. Diener N. Schwarz (Eds) Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology Russell Sage Foundations New York 61–84

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Stolzenberg (1984) ’Can an inquiry into the foundations of mathematics tell us anything interesting about mind?’ P. Watzlawick (Eds) The Invented Reality Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Strack N. Schwarz E. Gschneidinger (1985) ArticleTitle’Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect and mode of thinking’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49 1460–1469 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0022-3514.49.6.1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Strack L.L. Martin N. Schwarz (1988) ArticleTitle’Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction’ European Journal of Social Psychology. 18 429–442

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Tourangeau (1984) ’Cognitive science and survey methods’ T.B. Jabine M.L. Straf J.M. Tanur R. Tourangeau (Eds) Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology:Building a Bridge betweenDisciplines NationalAcademy press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Varela (1979) Principles of Biological Autonomy North Holland New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Veenhoven (1984) Conditions of Happiness Kluwer Academy Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Glasersfeld ParticleVon (1984) ’Introduction to radical construcvism’ P Watzlawick (Eds) The Invented Reality Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Watzlawick (Eds) (1984) The Invented Reality Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W.B. Weimer (1977) ’A conceptual framework for cognitive psychology: Motor theories of the mind’ R. Shaw J.D. Bransford (Eds) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Wyer T.K. Srull (1989) Memory and Cognition in its Social Context Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Leonardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leonardi, F., Spazzafumo, L. & Marcellini, F. Subjective Well-Being: The Constructionist Point of View. A Longitudinal Study to Verify The Predictive Power of Top-Down Effects and Bottom-Up Processes. Soc Indic Res 70, 53–77 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-5016-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-5016-7

Keywords

Navigation