Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Particle Model of the Critical Hydraulic Gradient for Dike Piping

  • SOIL MECHANICS
  • Published:
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Aims and scope

The failure of dikes is mostly caused by the development of piping. Whether or not piping erosion develops is mainly determined by the critical hydraulic gradient. In this paper, a multi-particle model for the critical hydraulic gradient of dike piping is derived. The model is based on the Terzaghi formula, and considers particle size distribution characteristics and the interaction between the sand sample and the water flow. Using a global sensitivity analysis of the model, it was found that the determinants of piping occurrence are mainly the physical characteristics of the soil particles and the particle size distribution characteristics. Laboratory tests and a field case analysis (in China) of piping were carried out. The derived model was found to perform better than Terzaghi's model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Fell and J. J. Fry, "The state of the art of assessing the likelihood of internal erosion of embankment dams, water retaining structures and their foundations," Internal Erosion of Dams and Their Foundations, Taylor & Francis, London (2007).

  2. K. S. Richards and K. R. Reddy, "Experimental investigation of piping potential in earthen structures," Geotech. Spec. Publ., 178, 367-376 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. V. Zyl and M. E. Harr, "Seepage erosion analyses of structures," Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., Stockholm, 20(2), 503-509 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Z. V. Terzaghi, "Experimental investigation of the pressure of a loose medium on retaining walls with a vertical back face and horizontal backfill surface," Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 2(4), 197-200 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. B. Sellmeijer and M. A. Koenders, "Mathematical Model for Piping," Appl. Math. Modell., 15(6), 646-651 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. S. P. Ojha, V. P. Singh, and D. D. Adrian, "Influence of porosity on piping models of levee failure," J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 12(1071), 1071-1074 (2001a).

  7. C. S. P. Ojha, V. P. Singh, and D. D. Adrian, "Determination of Critical Head in Soil Piping," J. Hydraulic Eng., 129, 511-517 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.-X. Mao, X.-B. Duan, and L.-J. Wu, "Study of critical gradient of piping for various grain sizes in sandy gravels," Rock Soil Mech., 30(12), 3705-3709 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Bernatek-Jakiel, W. Vannoppen, and J. Poesen, "Assessment of grass root effects on soil piping in sandy soils using the pinhole test," Geomorphology, 295, 563-571 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Wang, J.-S. Chen, H.-Q. He, et al., "Experimental study on piping in sandy gravel foundations considering effect of overlying clay," Water Sci. Eng., 9(2), 165-171 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Dolzyk and I. Chmielewska, "Predicting the coefficient of permeability of non-plastic soils," Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 51(5), 213-218 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Indraratna, V. T. Nguyen, and C. Rujikiatkamjorn, "Assessing the potential of internal erosion and suffusion of granular soils," J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 138(6), 550-554 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Maknoon and T. -F. Mahdi, "Experimental investigation into embankment external suffusion," Nat. Hazards, 54(3), 749-763 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Moffat, J.F. Fannin, and S. Garner, "Spatial and temporal progression of internal erosion in cohesionless soil," Can. Geotech. J., 48(3), 399-412 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. W. Atallah, A. Shakoor, and C. F. Watts, "Investigating the potential and mechanism of soil piping causing water-level drops in Mountain Lake, Giles County, Virginia," Eng. Geol., 195, 282-291 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Terzaghi, Theoretical Soil Mechanics, Wiley, New York (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.-F. Cui, "Study on the permeability characteristics of non-cohesive soil and its mechanism of piping failure," M.Sc. thesis, Ho Hai University, Nanjing, China, 66-86 (2006).

  18. B. Aberg, "Hydraulic conductivity of noncohesive soils," J. Geotech. Eng., 118(9), 1335-1347 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Campolongo, A. Saltelli, and J. Cariboni, "From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis. A unified approach," Comput. Phys. Commun., 182, 978-988 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Briola, P. D. Marco, R. Gabbrielli, et al., "Sensitivity analysis for the energy performance assessment of hybrid compressed air energy storage systems," Appl. Energy, 206(15), 1552-1563 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Leonelli, C. Gorgen, and J. Q. Smith, "Sensitivity analysis in multilinear probabilistic models," Inform. Sci., 411, 84-97 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Chisaria, G. Rizzano, C. Amadio, et al., "Sensitivity analysis and calibration of phenomenological l models for seismic analyses," Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 109, 10-22 (2018).

  23. J. Hall, S. Boyce, R. Dawson, et al., "Sensitivity analysis for hydraulic model," J. Hydraulic Eng., 135 (11), 959-969 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, and A. Saltelli, "An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models," Environ. Modell. Software, 22, 1509-1518 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.-R. Marc and Jan Kwakkel, "Tree-based ensemble methods for sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A performance comparison with Sobol and Morris techniques," Environ. Modell. Software, 107, 245-266 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Wang, J. -S Chen, Y. -L. Luo, et al., "Experimental investigation of the erosion mechanisms of piping," Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 52(5), 301-309 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Wang, J. -S. Chen, Y. -L. Luo, et al., "Experiments on internal erosion in sandy gravel foundations containing a suspended cutoff wall under complex stress states," Nat. Hazards, 74(2), 1163-1178 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Liu, D. -S. Xie, and Y. -H. Cui, "Destructive tests on piping failure of sandy gravel layer of river dikes," Chin J. Geotech. Eng., 31(8), 1188-1191 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.-J. Deng, Q.-C. Guo, and J.-G. Chen, "Study on the roughness in sediment-laden flows," J. Sedim. Res., 5, 24-29 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lu.

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 3, p. 11, May-June, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ming, P., Lu, J., Cai, X. et al. Multi-Particle Model of the Critical Hydraulic Gradient for Dike Piping. Soil Mech Found Eng 57, 200–210 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-020-09656-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-020-09656-1

Navigation