Skip to main content
Log in

Chinese tombs oriented by a compass: Evidence from paleomagnetic changes versus the age of tombs

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extant written records indicate that knowledge of an ancient type of compass in China is very old — dating back to before the Han dynasty (206 BC-220 AD) to at least the 4th century BC. Geomancy (feng shui) was practised for a long time (for millenia) and had a profound influence on the face of China’s landscape and city plans. The tombs (pyramids) near the former Chinese capital cities of Xi’an and Luoyang (together with their suburban fields and roads) show strong spatial orientations, sometimes along a basic South-North axis (relative to the geographic pole), but usually with deviations of several degrees to the East or West. The use of the compass means that the needle was directed towards the actual magnetic pole at the time of construction, or last reconstruction, of the respective tomb. However the magnetic pole, relative to the nearly ‘fixed’ geographic pole, shifts significantly over time. By matching paleomagnetic observations with modeled paleomagnetic history we have identified the date of pyramid construction in central China with the orientation relative to the magnetic pole positions at the respective time of construction. As in Mesoamerica, where according to the Fuson hypothesis the Olmécs and Maya oriented their ceremonial buildings and pyramids using a compass even before the Chinese, here in central China the same technique may have been used. We found a good agreement of trends between the paleodeclinations observed from tomb aligments and the available global geomagnetic field model CALS7K.2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlson J.B., 1975. Lodestone compass: Chinese or Olmec primacy? Science, 189, 753–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donadini F., Korhonen K., Riisager P. and Pesonen L.J., 2006. Database for Holocene geomagnetic intensity information. Eos Trans. AGU, 87(14), 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donadini F, Korte M. and Constable C.G., 2009. Geomagnetic field for 0–3 ka: 1. New data sets for global modelling. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 10, Q06007, DOI: 10.1029/2008GC002295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Zuobin (Tung Tso-pin), 1960. Chronological Tables of Chinese History (Zhongguo nianli zongpu), 2 Vols. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke H., 1976. Sung Biographies, Part 1–3, Band 16/1–3. XXIX, 1271, Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH., Wiesbaden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson R.H., 1969. The orientation of Mayan ceremonial centers. Annals Assoc. Amer. Geogr., 59, 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui Gu Zi, 4th century BC. Book of the Devil Valley Master

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_monarchs

  • http://www.maps-china.com/Xian (Luoyang)

  • http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/en/imgdata/

  • Jacobs J.A., 1987. Geomagnetism. Academic Press, Cambridge University, HBL Publishers.

  • Jiang Lianfu, 1959. Chronological Tables of Historical Personalities Through the Dynasties (Lidai renwu nianli beizhuan zongbiao). Beijing, China (in Chinese).

  • Klokočník J., Kostelecký J. and Vítek F., 2007. Pyramids and ceremonial centers in Mesoamerica: were they oriented using a magnetic compass? Stud. Geophys. Geod., 51, 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klokočník J., Kostelecký J., Böhm V., Böhm B., Vondrák J. and Vítek F., 2008. Correlation between the Mayan calendar and ours: Astronomy helps to answer why the most popular correlation (GMT) is wrong. Astro. Nachr., 329,426–436, DOI:10.1002/asna.200710892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmaš J., 1995. Letter to Etienne Souciet in Paris: 22nd September 1731. The Letters of Karel Slavíček from China to Homeland and Other Correspondence with European Astronomers (Karel Slavíček, Listy z Číny do vlasti a jiná korespondence s evropskými hvězdáři (1716–1735)). Vyšehrad Publ., Prague, Czech Republic, 148–155 (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmaš J. and Malina J., 2005. China from Anthropological Point of View (Čína z antropologické perspektivy). Panoráma biologické a sociokulturní antropologie, 21. Nadace Universitas, Brno, Czech Republic (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen K., Donadini F., Riisager P. and Pesonen L.J., 2008. GEOMAGIA50: an archeointensity database with PHP and MySQL. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, Q04029, DOI: 10.1029/2007GC001,893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte M., Genevey A., Constable C.G., Frank U. and Schnepp E., 2005. Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millenia. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 6, Q02H15, DOI: 10.10.1029/2004GC000800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte M. and Constable C.G., 2008. Spatial and temporal resolution of millennial scale geomagnetic field model. Adv. Space Res., 41, 57–69, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanos P., Le Golf M., Kovacheva M. and Schnepp E., 2005. Hierarchical modelling of archeomagnetic data and curve estimation by moving average technique. Geophys. J. Int., 160, 440–476, DOI: 10 1111/j.1365-246x.2005.02490.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund S.P., 2007. Paleomagnetic secular variation. In: Gubbins D. and Herrero-Bervera E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny M.W. and McFadden P.L., 2000. Paleomagnetism, Continents and Oceans. Academic Press, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moule A.C., 1957. The Rulers of China 221 B.C.-1949 A.D. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham J., 1964: Science and China’s influence on the world. In: Dawson R. (Ed.), The Legacy of China. Cheng & Tsui Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan Guoding 1956: Chronological Tables of Chinese History (Zhongguo lishi jinianbiao). Commercial Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Haosheng, 1936. Comparative Tables of Days According to the Chinese and Occidental Calendars (Jinshi zhong xi shiri duizhaobiao). Shanghai, China (in Chinese, reprint 1981).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivanka Charvátová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charvátová, I., Klokočník, J., Kolmaš, J. et al. Chinese tombs oriented by a compass: Evidence from paleomagnetic changes versus the age of tombs. Stud Geophys Geod 55, 159–174 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-011-0009-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-011-0009-2

Keywords

Navigation