Abstract
The eigenvalue decomposition technique is used for analysis of conditionality of two alternative solutions for a determination of the geoid from local gravity data. The first solution is based on the standard two-step approach utilising the inverse of the Abel-Poisson integral equation (downward continuation) and consequently the Stokes/Hotine integration (gravity inversion). The second solution is based on a single integral that combines the downward continuation and the gravity inversion in one integral equation. Extreme eigenvalues and corresponding condition numbers of matrix operators are investigated to compare the stability of inverse problems of the above-mentioned computational models. To preserve a dominantly diagonal structure of the matrices for inverse solutions, the horizontal positions of the parameterised solution on the geoid and of data points are identical. The numerical experiments using real data reveal that the direct gravity inversion is numerically more stable than the downward continuation procedure in the two-step approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberts B. and Klees R., 2004. A comparison of methods for the inversion of airborne gravity data. J. Geodesy, 78, 55–65.
Arfken G., 1985. Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd Edition. Academic Press, Orlando.
Bjerhammar A., 1962. Gravity Reductions to a Spherical Surface. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm.
Bjerhammar A., 1963. A New Theory of Gravimetric Geodesy. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm.
Bjerhammar A., 1987. Discrete Physical Geodesy. Report 380, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Engels H., Grafarend E., Keller W., Martinec Z., Sansò F. and Vaníček P., 1993. The geoid as an inverse problem to be regularized. In: G. Anger, R. Gorenflo, H. Jochmann, H. Moritz and W. Webers (Eds.), Inverse Problems: Principles and Applications in Geophysics, Technology and Medicine. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 122–167.
Hageman L. and Young D., 1981. Applied Iterative Methods. New York, Academic Press.
Hobson E.W., 1931. The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ilk K.H., 1993. Regularization for high resolution gravity field recovery by future satellite techniques. In: G. Anger, R. Gorenflo, H. Jochmann, H. Moritz and W. Webers (Eds.), Inverse Problems: Principles and Applications in Geophysics, Technology and Medicine. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 189–214.
Kellogg O.D., 1929. Foundations of Potential Theory. Springer, Berlin.
Lavrentiev M.M., Romanov V.G. and Shishatskii S.P., 1986. Ill-Posed Problems of Mathematical Physics and Analysis. Translated by J.R. Schulenberger, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 64, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R. I., 1986, ISBN 0-2818-4517-9.
Martinec Z., 1996. Stability investigations of a discrete downward continuation problem for geoid determination in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. J. Geodesy, 70, 805–828.
Martinec Z., 1998. Boundary value problems for gravimetric determination of a precise geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, 73, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany.
Novák P., 2000. Evaluation of Gravity Data for the Stokes-Helmert Solution to the Geodetic Boundary-Value Problem. Technical Report 207, UNB, Fredericton, Canada.
Novák P., 2003. Geoid determination using one-step integration. J. Geodesy, 77, 193–206.
Novák P., Kern M., Schwarz K.P., Sideris M.G., Heck B., Ferguson S., Hammada Y. and Wei M., 2003. On geoid determination from airborne gravity. J. Geodesy, 76, 510–522.
Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A. and Vetterling W.T., 1992. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Sideris M.G. and Forsberg R., 1991. Review of geoid prediction methods in mountainous regions. In: R.H. Rapp and F. Sansò (Eds.), Determination of the Geoid, Present and Future. IAG Symposia, 106, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, 51–62.
Tikhonov A.N., 1963. Regularization of incorrectly posed problems. Soviet Math. Dokl., 4(6), 1624–1627.
Tikhonov A.N. and Arsenin V.Y., 1977. Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. V.H. Vinston, Washington, D.C.
Varga R.S., 1962. Matrix Iterative Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Wilkinson J., 1965. The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Young D., 1972. Iterative Solutions of Large Linear Systems. Academic Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tenzer, R., Novák, P. Conditionality of inverse solutions to discretised integral equations in geoid modelling from local gravity data. Stud Geophys Geod 52, 53–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-008-0005-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-008-0005-3