Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cultural Beliefs About Manhood Predict Anti-LGBTQ+ Attitudes and Policies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tested whether differences in cultural beliefs about manhood can explain the large cultural variability in attitudes and social policies regarding sexual and gender minorities. If people believe manhood is an easily threatened, precarious social status (Vandello et al., 2008), then LGBTQ + groups may be targets of derogation as symbolic threats to masculinity and men’s distinctiveness. In a large pre-registered cross-cultural study of 62 countries, we tested whether country-level precarious manhood beliefs were associated with more negative attitudes, fewer rights, more restrictive laws, and less safety toward LGBTQ + groups. Hypotheses were largely supported, and these negative relationships generally held when controlling for religiosity, cultural tightness, traditional and security-related values, gender inequality, and sexism. Results suggest that the fates of societies’ most vulnerable gender and sexuality groups are related to societies’ beliefs about manhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The study described in this paper was pre-registered at OSF: https://osf.io/m5t3a/?view_only=6cb625b17d8b4300aafdd8360cb676e1.

All original data are reported in the manuscript (Table 1).

Notes

  1. We use the term LGBTQ + as an umbrella term to refer to various sexual and gender minorities. There is currently no consensus about which term (LGBT, LGBTQ, LGBTQI, LGBTQIA+) best captures these groups.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the National Science Centre in Poland (grant number: 2017/26/M/HS6/00360) awarded to Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Joseph Vandello led the writing and analyses.All authors contributed to the data collection, analysis, writing, and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph A. Vandello.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Because the data were based on publicly available archival statistics at the national level, there were no direct human participants in this study, and thus no informed consent. 

Human and Animal Ethics

Not applicable. 

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Public Significance Statement

This study finds that cross-national differences in endorsement of the belief that manhood is a precarious status is associated with negative attitudes and outcomes for LGBTQ + populations. Combatting prejudice toward gender and sexual minorities may require confronting how cultures view manhood. 

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vandello, J.A., Upton, R.A., Wilkerson, M. et al. Cultural Beliefs About Manhood Predict Anti-LGBTQ+ Attitudes and Policies. Sex Roles 88, 442–458 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01365-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01365-x

Keywords

Navigation