Abstract
Across two studies conducted in the United States, we apply an intersectional analysis to investigate how the interaction of sexual orientation (gay versus straight) and race (Black versus White) in male groups affect perceptions of inter-group similarity and stereotype content. The intersectionality hypothesis (Hypothesis 1) predicts that the interaction of race and sexual orientation will influence inter-group similarity perceptions and produce unique stereotype content that is not the result of simply adding race stereotypes to sexual orientation stereotypes. The related prototypicality hypothesis (Hypothesis 2) predicts that intersectional groups will generate more perceived dissimilarity and more unique attributes when they are non-prototypical with respect to race (Black) and sexual orientation (gay). We found strong support for intersectionality (Hypothesis 1); for Hypothesis 2, the prototypicality hypothesis, support was strongest with respect to the impact of non-prototypical sexual orientation (i.e., gayness). In Study 1, the group “Gay Black men” was viewed as most dissimilar to the group “Men,” and to its constituent ingroups. In Study 2, the group “Gay Black men” generated the most unique stereotype content. The addition of the label “gay” also reduced stereotype negativity, particularly in perceptions of Black men. The results contribute to research and theory by demonstrating that the intersection of ethnic and sexual orientation stereotypes is complex and produces meaningful differences in the perception of groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almquist, E. M. (1975). Untangling the effects of race and sex: The disadvantaged status of Black women. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 129–142. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.com/stable/42859476.
Arai, M., Bursell, M., & Nekby, L. (2008). Between meritocracy and ethnic discrimination: The gender difference (SULCIS Working Papers 2008: 2). Stockholm University, Linnaeus Center for Integration Studies.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596.
Beale, F. (1979). Double jeopardy: To be Black and female. In T. Cade (Ed.), The Black woman (pp. 90–100). New York: New American Library.
Bem, S. L. (1994). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426.
Bonam, C., Yantis, C., & Taylor, V. J. (2020). Invisible middle-class Black space: Asymmetrical person and space stereotyping at the race–class nexus. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218784189.
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821.
Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z.
Brown-Iannuzzi, J., Dotsch, R., Cooley, E., & Payne, B. K. (2017). The relationship between mental representations of welfare recipients and attitudes toward welfare. Psychological Science, 28(1), 92–103 http://dx.doi.org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.1177/0956797616674999.
Buhrmester, M. D., Talaifar, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–154 https://doi-org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.1177/1745691617706516.
Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1985). Why not measure that trait? Alternative criteria for identifying important dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 934–946. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.934.
Calabrese, S. K., Earnshaw, V. A., Magnus, M., Hansen, N. B., Krakower, D. S., Underhill, K., … Dovidio, J. F. (2018). Sexual stereotypes ascribed to black men who have sex with men: An intersectional analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0911-3.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608.
Cole, E. R. (2008). Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9419-1.
Cole, E. R., & Zucker, A. N. (2007). Black and White women’s perspectives on femininity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.1.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Identity politics, intersectionality, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039.
Crenshaw, K. (1993). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In D. K. Weisbert (Ed.), Feminist legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383–395). Philadelphia: Temple University Press (Original work published 1989).
DeLamater, J. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1998). Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551913.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18 https://dx.doi.org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5.
Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111002.
Dubé, E. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (1999). Sexual identity development among ethnic sexual-minority male youths. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1389.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (Vol. 2) (pp. 458–476). London: Sage Publications Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49.
Fields, E., Morgan, A., & Sanders, R. A. (2016). The intersection of sociocultural factors and health-related behavior in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: Experiences among young Black gay males as an example. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 63(6), 1091–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2016.07.009.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
Ghavami, N., & Peplau, L. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203.
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292.
Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288010.
Greene, B. (1994). Ethnic-minority lesbians and gay men: Mental health and treatment issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(2), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.2.243.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing… or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081.
Haley, H., Sidanius, J., Lowery, B., & Malamuth, N. (2004). The interactive nature of sex and race discrimination: A social dominance perspective. In G. Philogène (Ed.), Decade of behavior. Racial identity in context: The legacy of Kenneth B. Clark (pp. 149–160). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10812-009.
Han, C., Ayala, G., Paul, J. P., & Choi, K. (2017). West Hollywood is not that big on anything but White people: Constructing “gay Men of Color.” The Sociological Quarterly, 58(4), 721–737. https://dx.doi.org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.1080/00380253.2017.1354734.
Haslam, N., & Levy, S. R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276516.
Hegarty, P. (2017). On the failure to notice that white people are white: Generating and testing hypotheses in the celebrity guessing game. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000243.
Hogg, M. A., Hardie, E. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (1995). Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250204.
Johnson, K. L., & Ghavami, N. (2011). At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS One, 6(3), e18025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018025.
Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025335.
Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015025.
Kang, S. K., & Chasteen, A. L. (2009). Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1281–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.002.
Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074049.
King, D. H. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14, 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/494491.
Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Alcaraz, R., Scott, J., & Wilkins, P. (1995). Multiple variables in discrimination. In B. Lott & D. Maluso (Eds.), The social psychology of interpersonal discrimination (pp. 183–224). New York: Guilford Press. Retrieved from http://www2.lib.ku.edu/login?URL=?url=https://search-proquest-com.www2.lib.ku.edu/docview/618783527?accountid=14556.
Livingston, R. W., & Pearce, N. A. (2009). The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit Black chief executive officers? Psychological Science, 20(10), 1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02431.x.
Loiacano, D. K. (1989). Gay identity issues among Black Americans: Racism, homophobia, and the need for validation. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68(1), 21–25 https://dx.doi.org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1989.tb02486.x.
MacKinnon, C. A. (2013). Intersectionality as method: A note. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1086/669570.
Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.37.
Moore-Berg, S. L., & Karpinski, A. (2019). An intersectional approach to understanding how race and social class affect intergroup processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(1), 1–14. https://dx.doi.org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.1111/spc3.12426.
Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Molina, L. E., & Sidanius, J. (2010). Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An outgroup male target hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 936–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017931.
Parent, M. C., DeBlaere, C., & Moradi, B. (2013). Approaches to research on intersectionality: Perspectives on gender, LGBT, and racial/ethnic identities. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0283-2.
Pedulla, D. S. (2014). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 75–94.
Penner, A. M., & Saperstein, A. (2008). How social status shapes race. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(50), 19628–19630. https://dx.doi.org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.1073/pnas.0805762105.
Peplau, L. A., Veniegas, R. C., Taylor, P. L., & DeBro, S. C. (1999). Sociocultural perspectives on the lives of women and men. In L. A. Peplau, S. C. DeBro, R. C. Veniegas, & P. L. Taylor (Eds.), Gender, culture, and ethnicity: Current research about women and men (pp. 23–37). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co..
Perszyk, D. R., Lei, R. F., Bodenhausen, G. V., Richeson, J. A., & Waxman, S. R. (2019). Bias at the intersection of race and gender: Evidence from preschool-aged children. Developmental Science, 22(3), e12788. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12788.
Petsko, C. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2019). Racial stereotyping of gay men: Can a minority sexual orientation erase race? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.002.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00504.x.
Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.37.
Quinn, K., Bowleg, L., & Dickson-Gomez, J. (2019). The fear of being Black plus the fear of being gay: The effects of intersectional stigma on PrEP use among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Social Science & Medicine, 232, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.042.
Reid, P. T. (1984). Feminism versus minority group identity: Not for Black women only. Sex Roles, 10, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287778.
Remedios, J. D., Chasteen, A. L., Rule, N. O., & Plaks, J. E. (2011). Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay+ Black= likable? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.015.
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660. https://doi.org/10.1086/493756.
Rosette, A. S., Koval, C. Z., Ma, A., & Livingston, R. (2016). Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.008.
Schug, J., Alt, N. P., & Klauer, K. C. (2015). Gendered race prototypes: Evidence for the non-prototypicality of Asian men and Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.012.
Sesko, A. K., & Biernat, M. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.016.
Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54(9–10), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9029-8.
Shih, M., Bonam, C., Sanchez, D., & Peck, C. (2007). The social construction of race: Biracial identity and vulnerability to stereotypes. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.13.2.125.
Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Duke studies in political psychology: Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183–219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. M. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173–211). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043.
Sidanius, J., & Veniegas, R. C. (2000). Gender and race discrimination: The interactive nature of disadvantage. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 47–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://www2.lib.ku.edu/login?URL=?url=https://search-proquest-com.www2.lib.ku.edu/docview/619460990?accountid=14556.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry: A social dominance interpretation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(2), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022194252003.
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235009.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Social and cultural factors in perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 315–394). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgement. British Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00865.x.
Tomlinson, B. (2013). To tell the truth and not get trapped: Desire, distance, and intersectionality at the scene of argument. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 993–1017. https://doi.org/10.1086/669571.
van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01842.x.
Villicana, A. J., Delucio, K., & Biernat, M. (2016). “Coming out” among gay Latino and gay White men: Implications of verbal disclosure for well-being. Self and Identity, 15(4), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1156568.
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207 https://dx.doi.org.www2.lib.ku.edu/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x.
Whitley, B. E., & Ægisdóttir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42(11–12), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007026016001.
Funding
The present research was supported in part by the Jack Brehm Basic Research in Social Psychology Award to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors also wish to thank Adelaide Wendel for her assistance with data coding.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 34 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Preddie, J.P., Biernat, M. More than the Sum of Its Parts: Intersections of Sexual Orientation and Race as They Influence Perceptions of Group Similarity and Stereotype Content. Sex Roles 84, 554–573 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01185-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01185-3