Abstract
Findings regarding the effectiveness of (non)traditionally gendered advertisements are mixed and largely emanate from the United States. We tested the stereotype content model and ambivalent sexism theory cross-nationally in an advertising context and predicted that paternalistic (vs. envious) female stereotypes will trigger higher purchase intent (PI) irrespective of country (Hypothesis 1), viewers’ benevolent sexism will positively predict PI for paternalistic housewife advertisements (Hypothesis 2a), viewers’ hostile sexism will negatively predict PI for envious businesswoman advertisements (Hypothesis 2b), and these relationships with sexism will be confined to less gender egalitarian countries (i.e., Poland and South Africa) (Hypothesis 3). Statistical analyses of data from 468 Polish, South African, and British university students supported Hypothesis 1 and partially supported Hypotheses 2 and 3. The predicted patterns held for South Africa, but in Poland, viewers’ benevolence positively predicted PI for both advertisement types, with the exception of highly hostile women. British viewers’ hostility positively predicted PI for the housewife advertisement. Our findings support the cross-cultural applicability of the stereotype content model to advertising and suggest that the predictive role of sexism changes depending on its type, advertisement type, country, and gender. We recommend that advertisers should adopt a nuanced approach in predicting the effectiveness of gendered advertisements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, J. L., Garbinsky, E. N., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Cultivating admiration in brands: Warmth, competence, and landing in the “golden quadrant.”. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.012.
Abele, A. E., & Bruckmuller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the "Big Two"? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028.
Barry, T. E., Gilly, M. C., & Doran, L. E. (1985). Advertising to women with different career orientation. Journal of Advertising Research, 25(2), 26–35. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-24058-001.
Baxter, S. M., Kulczynski, A., & Ilicic, J. (2016). Ads aimed at dads: Exploring consumers’ reactions towards advertising that conforms and challenges traditional gender role ideologies. International Journal of Advertising, 35(6), 970–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1077605.
Becker, J. C. (2010). Why do women endorse hostile and benevolent sexism? The role of salient female subtypes and internalization of sexist contents. Sex Roles, 62, 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9707-4.
Bellizzi, J. A., & Milner, L. (1991). Gender positioning of a traditionally male-dominant product. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(3), 72–80.
Braun, M., & Scott, J. (2009). Gender-role egalitarianism—is the trend reversal real? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21, 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp032.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the behavioral sciences. UK: Taylor & Francis.
Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1261–1293.
Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women's employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross-national analysis of two waves. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005053168.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P., ... & Htun, T. T. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935.
Cumming, G. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3471.
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.
Debevec, K., & Iyer, E. (1986). The influence of spokespersons in altering a product's gender image: Implications for advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 15, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1986.10673033.
Dimofte, C. V., Goodstein, R. C., & Brumbaugh, A. M. (2015). A social identity perspective on aspirational advertising: Implicit threats to collective self-esteem and strategies to overcome them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.12.001.
Du Plessis, E. (2005). The advertised mind: Ground-breaking insights into how our brains respond to advertising. London: Kogan Page.
Duker, J. M., & Tucker, L. R. J. (1977). "Women's lib-ers" versus independent women: A study of preferences for women's roles in advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 469–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151187.
Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021020920715.
Eisend, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of gender roles in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(4), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0181-x.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.
Ford, J. B., & Latour, M. S. (1993). Differing reactions to female role portrayals in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 3(5), 43–51.
Furnham, A., & Paltzer, S. (2010). The portrayal of men and women in television advertisements: An updated review of 30 studies published since 2000. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00772.x.
Garst, J., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1997). Advertising's effects on men's gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 36, 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025661806947.
Gaunt, R. (2012). “Blessed is he who has not made me a woman”: Ambivalent sexism and Jewish religiosity. Sex Roles, 67, 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0185-8.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.2.109.
Glick, P., Fiske, S., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. M. (2002). Education and the catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021696209949.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Masser, B., Manganelli, A. M., Huang, L., Castro, Y. R., … & Castro, Y. R.. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713.
Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research. International Journal of Advertising, 35, 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1203556.
Infanger, M., & Sczesny, S. (2015). Communion-over-agency effects on advertising effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising, 34, 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.993794.
Infanger, M., Bosak, J., & Sczesny, S. (2012). Communality sells: The impact of perceivers' sexism on the evaluation of women's portrayals in advertisements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.868.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Introduction: Explaining the rising tide of gender equality. In R. Inglehart & P. Norris (Eds.), Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park: Sage.
Jaffe, L. J., & Berger, P. D. (1994). The effect of modern female role portrayals on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(4), 32–41.
Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.115.
Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.006.
LaFont, S. (2001). One step forward, two steps back: Women in the post-communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-8067X(01)00006-X.
Lee, K., Kim, H., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Stereotype threat in the marketplace: Consumer anxiety and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/659315.
Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00378.x.
Matthes, J., Prieler, M., & Adam, K. (2016). Gender-role portrayals in television advertising across the globe. Sex Roles, 75, 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0617-y.
Mikołajczak, M., & Pietrzak, J. (2014). Ambivalent sexism and religion: Connected through values. Sex Roles, 70(9–10), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0379-3.
Morrison, M. M., & Shaffer, D. R. (2003). Gender-role congruence and self-referencing as determinants of advertising effectiveness. Sex Roles, 149, 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024604424224.
Parry, G. (1983). A British version of the attitudes towards women scale (AWS-B). British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 261–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1983.tb00590.x.
Perkins, L. A., Thomas, K. M., & Taylor, G. A. (2000). Advertising and recruitment: Marketing to minorities. Psychology and Marketing, 17(3), 235–255.
Putrevu, S. (2004). Communicating with the sexes: Male and female responses to print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639168.
ASA Report (2017). Depictions, perceptions and harm: A report on gender stereotypes in advertising. Retrieved from https://www.asa.org.uk/genderresearch.html.
Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x.
Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedences of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745.
Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49(9–10), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749.
Walter, N. (2010). Living dolls, the return of sexism. London: Virago Press Ltd.
Whipple, T. W., & Courtney, A. E. (1980). How to portray women in TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 20, 53–59.
Whittler, T. E. (1991). The effects of actors' race in commercial advertising: Review and extension. Journal of Advertising, 20(1), 54–60.
Wolin, L. D. (2003). Gender issues in advertising: An oversight synthesis of research, 1970-2002. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021849903030125.
Zawisza, M. (2016). Applying universal dimensions of social perception to consumer context: An extension of the SCM/BIAF models with the relevance principle. In C. Jansson-Boyd & M. Zawisza (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 216–231). London: Taylor & Francis.
Zawisza, M., & Cinnirella, M. (2010). What matters more: Breaking tradition or stereotype content? Envious and paternalistic gender stereotypes and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1767–1797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1.
Zawisza, M., & Lobban, R. (2015). Implicit and explicit gender attitudes as predictors of the effectiveness of non-traditionally gendered advertisements. International Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 34–55.
Zawisza, M., & Pittard, C. (2015). When do warmth and competence sell best? The ‘golden quadrant’ shifts as a function of congruity with the product type, targets’ individual differences and advertising appeal type. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1015130.
Zawisza, M., Luyt, R., & Zawadzka, A. (2012). Ambivalence toward men: Comparing sexism among polish, South African and British university students. Sex Roles, 66, 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0112-4.
Zawisza, M., Luyt, R., & Zawadzka, A. M. (2015). Societies in transition: Are they more sexist? A comparison between polish, south African and British samples. Journal of Gender Studies, 24, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2013.803952.
Zawisza, M., Luyt, R., Zawadzka, A.M., & Buczny, J. (2016). Does it pay off to break male gender stereotypes in cross-national ads? A comparison of ad effectiveness between the United Kingdom, Poland and South Africa. Journal of Gender Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1234369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The research was conducted in accordance with APA ethical guidelines and I confirm that the manuscript reports original research and has not been submitted simultaneously to, or published in, any other publication outlet.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 23 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zawisza, M., Luyt, R., Zawadzka, A.M. et al. Cross-Cultural Sexism and the Effectiveness of Gender (Non)Traditional Advertising: A Comparison of Purchase Intentions in Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Sex Roles 79, 738–751 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0906-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0906-8