Abstract
This paper was written in response to Wood and Eagly’s (2015) feminist forum paper that proposes two traditions for gender identity research, a tradition based on gender-typed attributes and a tradition based on gender self-conceptualization. The present paper expands on Wood and Eagly’s (2015) framework by proposing, in line with social constructivist models, that both traditions of gender identity may be variable and context dependent. Specifically, the present paper reviews research conducted in the U.S.A. that suggests that gender-typed attributes and components of gender self-conceptualization may change based on contextual factors such as the gender of people in a person’s immediate context and the salience of gender in a given situation. The paper also reviews ways in which variation in gender-typed attributes and components of gender self-conceptualization has been measured previously, and suggests the use of experience sampling methodology for future research. Finally, the paper encourages researchers to consider Wood and Eagly’s (2015) suggestion of using the principle of compatibility when selecting trait or state measures of gender identity, and proposes that beliefs in gender essentialism (that gender differences are due to innate traits) may be reduced by understanding how contextual factors influence gender identity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselmi, D. L., & Law, A. L. (1998). Questions of gender, perspectives and paradoxes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Berenbaum, S. A., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). Sexual differentiation of human behavior: Effects of prenatal and pubertal organizational hormones. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 183–200. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.03.001.
Brewer, G., & Hamilton, V. (2014). Female mate retention, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8, 12–19. doi:10.1037/h0097245.
Cota, A. A., & Dion, K. L. (1986). Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 770–776. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.770.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1998). Gender behavior in a social context a social-psychological model of gender. In D. L. Anselmi & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender, perspectives and paradoxes (pp. 367–376). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dinella, L. M., Fulcher, M., & Weisgram, E. S. (2014). Sex-typed personality traits and gender identity as predictors of young adults' career interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 493–504. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0234-6.
Drury, K., Bukowski, W. M., Velásquez, A. M., & Stella-Lopez, L. (2013). Victimization and gender identity in single-sex and mixed-sex schools: Examining contextual variations in pressure to conform to gender norms. Sex Roles, 69, 442–454. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0118-6.
Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.
Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00280.x.
Funder, D. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.003.
Hyde, J. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.
Jones, K. D., & Heesacker, M. (2012). Addressing the situation: Some evidence for the significance of microcontexts with the gender role conflict construct. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 294–307. doi:10.1037/a0025797.
Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York: Basic Books.
Leaper, C. (2000). Gender, affiliation, assertion, and the interactive context of parent–child play. Developmental Psychology, 36, 381–393. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.381.
Leszczynski, J. P. (2009). A state conceptualization: Are individuals' masculine and feminine personality traits situationally influenced? Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 157–162. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.014.
Leszczynski, J. P., & Strough, J. (2008). The contextual specificity of masculinity and femininity in early adolescence. Social Development, 17, 719–736. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00443.x.
Lippa, R., & Connolly, S. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1051–1065. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1051.
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513.
Mehta, C.M., & Dementieva, Y (2015a). The contextual specificity of gender: Femininity and masculinity in same- and other-sex contexts. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Mehta, C.M., & Dementieva, Y. (2015b). Associations between location and reported femininity and masculinity. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2010). Gender segregation and gender-typing in adolescence. Sex Roles, 63, 251–263. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9780-8.
Mehta, C. M., Walls, C., Blood, E. A., & Shrier, L. A. (2014). Associations between affect, context, and sexual desire in depressed young women. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 577–585. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.753026.
Musto, M. (2014). Athletes in the pool, girls and boys on deck: The contextual construction of gender in coed youth swimming. Gender and Society, 28, 359–380. doi:10.1177/0891243213515945.
Oosterwegel, A. (2001) Commentary: The self-concept is dead, long live... which construct or process? Differentiation and organization of self-related theories. In H. A. Bosma, E. S. Kunnen, H. A. Bosma, & E. S. Kunnen (Eds.), Identity and emotion: Development through self-organization. (pp. 33–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pickard, J., & Strough, J. (2003). The effects of same-sex and other-sex contexts on masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 48, 421–432. doi:10.1037/t00748-000.
Rawlins, W. (2009). The compass of friendship: Narratives, identities, and dialogues. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Reisner, S. L., Greytak, E. A., Parsons, J. T., & Ybarra, M. L. (2015). Gender minority social stress in adolescence: Disparities in adolescent bullying and substance use by gender identity. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 243–256. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.886321.
Shields, S. A. (1993). Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shields, S. A. (1998). Gender in the psychology of emotion: A selective research review. In D. L. Anselmi & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender, perspectives and paradoxes (pp. 376–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shields, S. A. (2013). Gender and emotion: What we think we know, what we need to know, and why it matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 423–435. doi:10.1177/0361684313502312.
Shields, S. A., & Dicicco, E. C. (2011). The social psychology of sex and gender: From gender differences to doing gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 491–499. doi:10.1177/0361684311414823.
Shrier, L. A., Shih, M. C., Hacker, L., & de Moor, C. (2007). A momentary sampling study of the affective experience following coital events in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, e1–e8. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.014.
Smith, C. J., Noll, J. A., & Bryant, J. B. (1999). The effect of social context on gender self-concept. Sex Roles, 40, 499–512. doi:10.1037/t00748-000.
Van der Meulen, M. (2001). Developments in self-concept theory and research: Affect, context, and variability. In H. A. Bosma, E. S. Kunnen, H. A. Bosma, & E. S. Kunnen (Eds.), Identity and emotion: Development through self-organization (pp. 10–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vantieghem, W., Vermeersch, H., & Van Houtte, M. (2014). Why 'gender' disappeared from the gender gap: (Re-)introducing gender identity theory to educational gender gap research. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 357–381. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9248-8.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.
White, J. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Think women, think warm: Stereotype content activation in women with a salient gender identity, using a modified stroop task. Sex Roles, 60, 247–260. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9526-z.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0480-2.
Yoon, H. J., & Kim, Y. (2014). The moderating role of gender identity in responses to comedic violence advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43, 382–396. doi:10.1080/00913367.2014.880390.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Yulia Dementieva for creating the figures presented in this manuscript.
Ethics Statement
IRB approval was granted for unpublished data presented in this paper. This unpublished data was collected in accordance with APA ethical guidelines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehta, C.M. Gender in Context: Considering Variability in Wood and Eagly’s Traditions of Gender Identity. Sex Roles 73, 490–496 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0535-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0535-4