Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are Girls more Resilient to Gender-Conformity Pressure? The Association Between Gender-Conformity Pressure and Academic Self-Efficacy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1990s, it has become clear that Belgian girls tend to outperform boys on educational parameters. Similar educational gender gaps are encountered in other western industrialized countries and are often attributed to cultural conventions concerning typical masculinity and femininity, which would inform gendered study cultures. This paper investigates the influence of gendered peer cultures in Flanders on an individual level by employing the concept of pressure for gender conformity. More specifically, the gender-differentiated impact of gender-conformity pressure is investigated in relation to academic self-efficacy. We examine these inter- and intragender differences in a sample of 6380 seventh-grade students in Flanders (the northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium), clustered in 59 schools. The data were collected at the start and the end of the 2012–13 school year. Results from multilevel regression analysis at two waves show that boys’ academic self-efficacy is lower when experiencing more pressure for gender conformity. Girls’ academic self-efficacy, however, does not decline when experiencing similar levels of pressure. In addition, when taking into account the negative toll that pressure for gender conformity has on girls’ well-being, their academic self-efficacy is higher when experiencing more pressure. This gender-differentiated impact of pressure for gender conformity is not apparent at the start of the school year, but emerges in the course of seventh grade. The results are discussed in light of gendered expectations for boys and girls in the Belgian context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206–1222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01791.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, R., Wheldall, K., & Kemp, C. (2006). Differential teacher attention to boys and girls in the classroom. Educational Review, 58, 339–366. doi:10.1080/00131910600748406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, S. (2003). Gender and special educational needs. In C. Skelton & B. Francis (Eds.), Boys and girls in the primary classroom (pp. 98–112). Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhanot, R., & Jovanovic, J. (2005). Do parents’ academic gender stereotypes influence whether they intrude on their children’s homework? Sex Roles, 52, 597–607. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3728-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, S., & Van Houtte, M. (2012). Social inequalities in educational choice at the transition from primary to secondary education: A matter of rational calculation? Kultura i Edukacja= Culture and Education, 91, 188–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, H., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2010). Children’s gender identity in lesbian and heterosexual two-parent families. Sex Roles, 62, 114–126. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9704-7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen, G. A. (2013). Confronting math stereotypes in the classroom: Its effect on female college students’ sexism and perceptions of confronters. Sex Roles, 69, 297–307. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0287-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 78–96. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, P. R., Yunger, J. L., & Perry, D. G. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95–109. doi:10.1023/A:1024423012063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CITO. (2010). Toets begrijpend lezen groep 8 [Test reading comprehension group 8]. Arnhem: CITO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1996). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender strategies for schools. Teachers College Record, 98, 206–235.

  • Corby, B. C., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (2007). Gender identity and adjustment in Black, Hispanic, and White preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 261–266. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derks, A., & Vermeersch, H. (2001). Gender en schools presteren: Een multilevel-analyse naar de oorzaken van de grotere schoolachterstand van jongens in het Vlaams secundair onderwijs [Gender and scholastich achievement: A multi-level analysis into the causes of boys’ higher school delay in Flemish secondary education]. Brussels: Ministry of the Flemish Community, Education Department (Vol. 26): TOR.

  • Derks, A., & Vermeersch, H. (2002). Studeren is voor mietjes! Een analyse van de genderverschillen in schools presteren [Studying is for wussies! An analysis of gender differences in scholastic performance]. In M. Elchardus & I. Glorieux (Eds.), De symbolische samenleving [The symbolical society] (pp. 215–240). Tielt: Lannoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudal, P. (2003). Oriënteringstest wiskunde 6 [Orientation test mathematics 6]. Brussel: VCLB Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, K. C., & Oyserman, D. (2012). If ‘we’can succeed, ‘I’can too: Identity-based motivation and gender in the classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 176–185. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.003.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D. (1998). Real boys don’t work: ‘Underachievement’, masculinity and the harassment of ‘sissies’. In D. Epstein, J. Elwood, V. Hey, & J. Maw (Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement (pp. 96–108). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 499–505. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2010). Judgments of self-perceived academic competence and their differential impact on students’ achievement motivation, learning approach, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 519–536. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0030-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FOD-Economie (2013). Analyse - De Belgische arbeidsmarkt in 2012 [The Belgian labor market in 2012]. Brussels: Annie Versonnen. Retrieved from http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/modules/publications/statistiques/arbeidsmarkt_levensomstandigheden/de_belgische_arbeidsmarkt_in_2012.jsp.

  • Francis, B. (2000). Boys, girls and achievement: Addressing the classroom issues. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462–482. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyder, A., & Kessels, U. (2013). Is school feminine? Implicit gender stereotyping of school as a predictor of academic achievement. Sex Roles, 69, 605–617. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0309-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, S. S. (2007). Adolescents’ acceptance of same-sex peers based on sexual orientation and gender expression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 363–371. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9111-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1–35. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Myhill, D. (2004). ‘Troublesome boys’ and ‘compliant girls’: Gender identity and perceptions of achievement and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 547–561. doi:10.1080/0142569042000252044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, L. M., Bigler, R. S., Liben, L. S., & Green, V. A. (2009). Teaching children to confront peers’ sexist remarks: Implications for theories of gender development and educational practice. Sex Roles, 61, 361–382. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9634-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C., Farkas, T., & Brown, C. S. (2012). Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 268–282. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 431. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.3.431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., & Hanish, L. D. (2014). Gendered-peer relationships in educational contexts. In L. S. Liben & R. S. Bigler (Eds.), The role of gender in educational contexts and outcomes (Vol. 47, pp. 151–187). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W. (1996). Gendered learning practices: Exploring the costs of hegemonic masculinity for girls and boys in schools. In Ministerial Council on Education, Training and Youth Affairs (Ed.), Gender equity: A framework for action in Australian schools (pp. 124–144). Canberra: Department of Education and Training, and Children’s, Youth and Family Bureau.

  • Martino, W. (1999). ‘Cool boys’, ‘party animals’, ‘squids’ and ‘poofters’: Interrogating the dynamics and politics of adolescent masculinities in school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 239–263. doi:10.1080/01425699995434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, M. (2011). Does felt gender compatibility mediate influences of self-perceived gender nonconformity on early adolescents’ psychosocial adjustment? Child Development, 82, 1152–1162. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01601.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. W. (2012). Learning the hard way: Masculinity, place, and the gender gap in education. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., & Destin, M. (2010). Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 1001–1043. doi:10.1177/0011000010374775.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 188–204. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 116–125. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 366–381. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PISA. (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Paris: OECD-Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoSa. (2014). Arbeidsparticipatie in België [Laborforce participation in Belgium]. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.rosadoc.be/joomla/index.php/kwesties/arbeidsparticipatie/in-vlaanderen.

  • Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2001). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). San Diego: Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2011). Gender inequality index and related indicators. Human Development Report. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2006a). The gender gap in language achievement: The role of school-related attitudes of class groups. Sex Roles, 55, 397–408. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9092-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2006b). Tracking and the effects of school‐related attitudes on the language achievement of boys and girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 293–309. doi:10.1080/01425690600750478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2008). Mathematics participation and mathematics achievement across secondary school: The role of gender. Sex Roles, 59, 568–585. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9455-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2009). School engagement and language achievement: A longitudinal study of gender differences across secondary school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 373–405. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, M. (2004a). Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievement of boys. Educational Studies, 30, 409–423. doi:10.1080/0305569042000310336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, M. (2004b). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30, 159–173. doi:10.1080/0305569032000159804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, M. (2007). Exploring teacher trust in technical/vocational secondary schools: Male teachers’ preference for girls. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 826–839. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2009). School ethnic composition and students’ integration outside and inside schools in Belgium. Sociology of Education, 82, 217–239. doi:10.1177/003804070908200302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, M., Demanet, J., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2012). Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference? Acta Sociologica, 55, 73–89. doi:10.1177/0001699311431595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Landeghem, G., & Van Damme, J. (2007). Geboortecohorten in de tweede en derde graad van het voltijds gewoon secundair onderwijs. Evolutie van 1989—1990 tot 2005—2006 [Birth cohorts in the second and third grade of full-time regular secondary education. Evolution from 1989–1990 until 2005–2006]. Steunpunt SSL-rapport SSL/OD1/2007.02.

  • Van Landeghem, G., Goos, M., & Van Damme, J. (2010). Vroege schoolverlaters in Vlaanderen. Evolutie van de ongekwalificeerde uitstroom tot 2007 [Early drop-out in Flanders. Evolution of the unqualified drop-out until 2007]. Steunpunt SSL-rapport SSL/OD1/2009.25.

  • Van Woensel, A. (2007). Genderjaarboek [Gender yearbook]. Leuven: Departement Werk en Sociale Economie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vantieghem, W., Vermeersch, H., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). Transcending the gender dichotomy in educational gender gap research: the impact of gender identity on self-efficacy. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Istanbul.

  • Vantieghem, W., Vermeersch, H., & Van Houtte, M. (2014). Transcending the gender dichotomy in educational gender gap research: The association between gender identity and academic self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 369–378. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N., Ryan, W. S., DeHaan, C. R., Przybylski, A. K., Legate, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Parental autonomy support and discrepancies between implicit and explicit sexual identities: Dynamics of self-acceptance and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 815–832. doi:10.1037/a0026854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R., Rogalin, C. L., Conlon, B., & Wojnowicz, M. T. (2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 980–1022. doi:10.1086/668417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunger, J. L., Carver, P. R., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40, 572–582. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Campbell Leaper, Antoinette Wilson, Timea Farkas, Veronica Hamilton and Christine Starr at UCSC for their suggestions and thoughtful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendelien Vantieghem.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Dutch wording and English translation of key scales

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vantieghem, W., Van Houtte, M. Are Girls more Resilient to Gender-Conformity Pressure? The Association Between Gender-Conformity Pressure and Academic Self-Efficacy. Sex Roles 73, 1–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0509-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0509-6

Keywords

Navigation