Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Women of Color Detect and Respond to Multiple Forms of Prejudice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The processes by which women of color and White women living in the United States detect and respond to prejudice may differ because women of color experience racism, sexism and intersectional bias. This review builds on past research by articulating how existing process models of stigmatization, when applied to the stigmatization of women of color, leave important research questions unanswered. Stigmatized individuals’ interpretations of and responses to others’ behaviors are continuously shaped by the possibility that they will be targeted by prejudice. In each interaction in which prejudice is plausible, targets first determine whether they have experienced prejudice and, if so, they cope with the psychological and emotional consequences of prejudiced treatment. Current theories of stigmatization best account for the experiences of people who face only one form of prejudice. In contrast, we consider how women of color, who possess multiple stigmatized identities, respond to the multiple forms of prejudice they face. First, we identify barriers to including women of color in stigma research. Second, we describe research examining how targets with one stigmatized identity detect, respond to and cope with prejudice. Third, we draw on related research on multiple identities in areas outside of the stigma literature (e.g., intergroup bias, cognition) to raise questions that are important to address in future stigma research. Our analysis is supported primarily by research conducted in the U. S. Addressing the research questions raised in this review will position the stigma literature to more readily capture the stigmatizing experiences of women of color.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apfelbaum, E. P., Phillips, K. W., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). Rethinking the baseline in diversity research: Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 235–244. doi:10.1177/1745691614527466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2004). The ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: Stereotype vulnerability and the academic self-knowledge of African American college students. Psychological Science, 15, 829–836. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00763.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, L. G. (2011). An intersectional approach to Black/White interracial interactions: The roles of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 68, 791–802. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0104-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich, J., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D., & Steele, C. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychological Science, 12, 225–229. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z.

  • Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413–1418. doi:10.1177/0956797611420445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbado, D. W. (2000). Race and sex in antidiscrimination law. In L. W. Levy, K. L. Karst, D. J. Mahoney, & J. G. West (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the American Constitution (2nd ed., pp. 2089–2093). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C.-Y., & Lee, F. (2009). Multiracial identity integration: Perceptions of conflict and distance among multiracial individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 51–68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01587.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C.-Y., Sanchez-Burks, J., & Lee, F. (2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19, 1178–1184. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02220.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11, 399–402. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. The American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Differential evaluation of crossed category groups: Patterns, processes, and reducing intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 307–333. doi:10.1177/1368430299024001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R. J., Turner, R. N., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Common ingroups and complex identities: Routes to reducing bias in multiple category contexts. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 32–46. doi:10.1037/a0017303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.96.4.608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–74). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaither, S. E. (2015). The multiracial demographic: A call for research. Current Directions in Psychological Science. (in press).

  • Galinsky, A. D., Hall, E. V., & Cuddy, A. J. C. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24, 498–506. doi:10.1177/0956797612457783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghavami, N., & Peplau, L. A. (2012). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 113–127. doi:10.1177/0361684312464203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670. doi:10.1177/0146167202288010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, S. A., Williams, K. D., & Carter-Sowell, A. R. (2010). The psychological sting of stigma: The costs of attributing ostracism to racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 612–618. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, C. L., Aguilar, L., Kaiser, C. R., Blascovich, J., & Lee, K. (2007). The self-protective and undermining effects of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 884–893. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, M. L., & Baron, R. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 727–739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2008). The face of chauvinism: How prejudice expectations shape perceptions of facial affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 758–766. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Spears, R. (2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204–1213. doi:10.1177/0146167201279012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, C. R., Vick, S. B., & Major, B. (2006). Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science, 17, 332–338. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128. doi:10.1037/h0034225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. R. (2003a). Do you see what I see? Effects of group consciousness on African American women’s attributions to prejudice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 17–30. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. R. (2003b). Racism or sexism? Attributional ambiguity and simultaneous membership in multiple oppressed groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 223–247. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01894.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., Roberson, L., & Perry, E. L. (2007). The multiple category problem: Category activation and inhibition in the hiring process. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 529–548. doi:10.2307/20159314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23, 354–358. doi:10.1177/0956797611428079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, C. H., James, L., Tharao, W., & Loutfy, M. R. (2011). HIV, gender, race, sexual orientation, and sex work: A qualitative study of intersectional stigma experienced by HIV-positive women in Ontario, Canada. PLoS Medicine, 8, 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 251–330). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., & McCoy, S. K. (2003a). It’s not my fault: When and why attributions to prejudice protect self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 772–781. doi:10.1177/0146167203029006009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, T. (2003b). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220–231. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00547-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005–1017. doi:10.1177/0146167203253466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, W. B., Major, B., McCoy, S., & Blascovich, J. (2008). How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 278–291. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.278.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V. J., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students’ college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896–918. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (2013). Special Report NSF 13–304 (pp. 13–304). Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/

  • Oney, C. N., Cole, E. R., & Sellers, R. M. (2011). Racial identity and gender as moderators of the relationship between body image and self-esteem for African Americans. Sex Roles, 65, 619–631. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9962-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, E. A., & Smart Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 531–554. doi:10.1037/a0016059.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pittinsky, T. L., Shih, M., & Ambady, N. (1999). Identity adaptiveness: Affect across multiple identities. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 503–518. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remedios, J. D., Chasteen, A. L., & Paek, J. D. (2012). Not all prejudices are experienced equally: Comparing experiences of racism and sexism in female minorities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 273–287. doi:10.1177/1368430211411594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, L., & Lobel, M. (2011). Explaining racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes: Unique sources of stress for Black American women. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 977–983. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosette, A. S., & Livingston, R. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1162–1167. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, J., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Cognitive costs of exposure to racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 18, 810–815. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01984.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Hucles, J. V., & Davis, D. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. The American Psychologist, 65, 171–181. doi:10.1037/a0017459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, P. J., Major, B., Casad, B. J., Townsend, S. S. M., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Discrimination and the stress response: Psychological and physiological consequences of anticipating prejudice in interethnic interactions. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 1020–1026. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300620.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The internal and external causal loci of attributions to prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 620–628. doi:10.1177/0146167202288006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210. doi:10.1177/0146167202282006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settles, I. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 487–500. doi:10.1177/0146167203261885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9029-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2007). From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a multi-threat framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 107–130. doi:10.1177/1088868306294790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, J. N. (2000). A reconceptualiztion of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 374–390. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, S., Hardin, C. D., & Lowery, B. S. (2006). Self-stereotyping in the context of multiple social identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 529–542. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. (2013). Race, gender, class, sexuality (RGCS) and hypertension. Social Science & Medicine, 89, 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, L. R., & Shields, S. A. (2013). The intersections of sexuality, gender, and race: Identity research at the crossroads. Sex Roles, 68, 803–810. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0281-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H. W., & Jackson, J. S. (2003). Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 200–208. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.2.200.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woods-Giscombé, C. L., & Lobel, M. (2008). Race and gender matter: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing and measuring stress in African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 173–182. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.173.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Note

We would like to thank Sam Sommers for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors are not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding of financial holdings that might be perceived as presening a conflict of interest or as affecting the objectivity of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica D. Remedios.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Remedios, J.D., Snyder, S.H. How Women of Color Detect and Respond to Multiple Forms of Prejudice. Sex Roles 73, 371–383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0453-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0453-5

Keywords

Navigation