Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Observing Workplace Incivility Towards Women: The Roles of Target Reactions, Actor Motives, and Actor-Target Relationships

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study conceptualized observer reactions to uncivil behavior towards women as an ethical behavior and examined three factors (target reaction, actor motive, and actor-target relationship) that influence these reactions. Two vignette studies with women and men undergraduate and graduate students in western Switzerland were conducted. Study 1 (N = 148) was a written vignette study that assessed how the reaction of female targets to incivility and the motives of actors influenced observer reactions. Results showed that a female target’s reaction influenced observers’ evaluations of the harm caused by an uncivil incident, and that an actor’s motive affected observers’ assessments of the necessity to intervene. Study 2 (N = 81) was a video vignette study that assessed the effects of the reactions by female targets to incivility and the relationship between the target and the actor on observer reactions. We found that female targets’ reactions influenced observers’ evaluations of harm and the perceived necessity to intervene. Furthermore, the effect of a female target’s reaction on observers’ evaluations of harm was moderated by the relationship between the actor and the target: a female target who laughed at the uncivil behavior was perceived as less harmed, when she and the actor had a personal relationship than when they had a professional relationship. When the female target reacted hurt or neutrally, actor-target relationship did not affect observers’ evaluations of harm. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiralling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471. doi:10.2307/259136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Cutler, B. D. (1990). Perceptions of sexual harassment: A re-examination of gender differences. The Journal of Psychology, 124, 409–416. doi:10.1080/00223980.1990.10543236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, A. (1997). Cross-cultural perspectives on sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 263–300). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavides-Espinoza, C., & Cunningham, G. B. (2010a). Bystanders’ reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 63, 201–213. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9781-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavides-Espinoza, C., & Cunningham, G. B. (2010b). Observers’ reporting of sexual harassment: The influence of harassment type, organizational culture, and political orientation. Public Organizational Review, 10, 323–337. doi:10.1007/s11115-009-0109-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilan enquêtes BAMA. (2012). Retrieved from the University of Lausanne, Unité systme d’information et statistique Web site: http://www.unil.ch/Jahia/site/statistiques/op/edit/pid/5757.

  • Bowes-Sperry, L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30, 288–306. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.16387886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowes-Sperry, L., & Powell, G. N. (1999). Observers’ reaction to social-sexual behavior at work: An ethical decision-making perspective. Journal of Management, 25, 779–802. doi:10.1177/014920639902500601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. K. S., Lam, C. B., Chow, S. Y., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 362–376. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2009). Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 272–288. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, G. B., Miner, K., & Benavides-Espinoza, C. (2012). Emotional reactions to observing misogyny: Examining the roles of gender, forecasting, political orientation, and religiosity. Sex Roles, 67, 58–68. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0121-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353–380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383. doi:10.1037/h0025589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducret, V., & Fehlmann, C. (1993). Harcèlement sexuel: La réalité cachée des femmes au travail. Enquête à Genève. Edité par le Bureau fédéral de l’égalité entre femmes et hommes. Berne: OFCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Statistical Office. (2013). On the way to gender equality: Current situation and developments. Neuchâtel: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/20/22/lexi.Document.169867.pdf.

  • Felson, R. B., & Ackerman, J. (2001). Arrest for domestic and other assaults. Criminology, 39, 655–676. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00936.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B., & Ribner, S. A. (1981). An attributional approach to accounts and sanctions for criminal violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 137–142. doi:10.2307/3033710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9, 55–64. doi:10.1177/027614678900900207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1995.1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, E., García, F., & Lila, M. (2008). Police involvement in cases of intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. Violence Against Women, 14, 697–714. doi:10.1177/1077801208317288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Eskew, D. E. (1993). The role of role playing in organizational research. Journal of Management, 19, 221–241. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(93)90053-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer and V. Macho (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003 GWDG Bericht [Research and scientific computer 2003 GWDG Report] (Vol. 63, pp. 79–93). Goettingen: Ges. f. Wiss. Datenverarbeitung. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13513/.

  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Basanez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook: Political, religious, sexual, and economic norms in 43 societies: Findings from the 1990–1993 World Values Survey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelan, E. K. (2009). Gender fatigue: The ideological dilemma of gender neutrality and discrimination in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 26, 197–210. doi:10.1002/cjas.106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, M., Cahn, N., & Miller, B. (2012). Gender equality in employment. Policies and practices in Switzerland and the U.S. George Washington University Global Women’s Initiative. Retrieved from www.gwu.edu%2F%7Eigis%2Fassets%2Fdocs%2Freport-gender-equality-switzerland-2012.pdf.

  • Kinnier, R. T., Kernes, J. L., & Dautheribes, T. M. (2000). A short list of universal moral values. Counseling and Values, 45, 4–16. doi:10.1002/j.2161-007X.2000.tb00178.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, D. E., Faley, R. H., Ekeberg, S. E., & Dubois, C. L. Z. (1997). Determinants of target responses to sexual harassment: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 22, 687–729. doi:10.5465/AMR.1997.9708210723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (1999). Rethinking bystander non-intervention: Social categorization and the evidence of witnesses at the James Bulger murder trial. Human Relations, 52, 1133–1155. doi:10.1023/A:1016991826572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malice. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/malice.

  • Maznevski, M. L., Gomez, C. B., DiStefano, J. J., Noorderhaven, N. G., & Wu, P. C. (2002). Cultural dimensions at the individual level of analysis. The cultural orientations framework. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2, 275–295. doi:10.1177/147059580223001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, K. N., & Eischeid, A. (2012). Observing incivility toward co-workers and negative emotions: Do gender of the target and observer matter? Sex Roles, 66, 492–505. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0108-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1254–1269. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011). A model of third parties’ morally-motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36, 526–543. doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.61031810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Tiedt, P., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (2004). Answering accountability questions in sexual harassment: Insights regarding harassers, targets, and observers. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 85–106. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., & Porath, C. L. (2009). The cost of bad behavior: How incivility is damaging your business and what to do about it. United States: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, L. E., & Dietz, J. (2008). Employment discrimination: Authority figures’ demographic preferences and followers’ affective organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1287–1300. doi:10.1037/a0012867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2012). Emotional and behavioral responses to workplace incivility and the impact of hierarchical status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, E326–E357. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01020.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Wessel, J. L. (2011). Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 488–509. doi:10.1002/job.765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G. M., Blaauw, E., & Patel, D. (2003). ‘There’s not smoke without fire’: Are male ex-partners perceived as more ‘entitled’ to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 94, 87–98. doi:10.1348/000712603762842129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shotland, R. L., & Straw, M. K. (1976). Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 990–999. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D., & Kulik, C. (2005). Third-party reactions to employee (mis) treatment: A justice perspective. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 183–229). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26005-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strub, S., & Schär Moser, M. (2008). Risiko und Verbreitung sexueller Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz: eine repräsentative Erhebung in der Deutschschweiz und in der Romandie [Risk and prevalence of sexual harassment in the workplace: a representative survey in German-speaking Switzerland and in the Romandie]. Bern: Eidgenössisches Büro für die Gleichstellung von Frau und Mann (EBG) und Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft.

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617. doi:10.2307/258313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2003). Managing business ethics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasti, S. A., Bergman, M. E., Glomb, T. M., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 766. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.5.766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, R. L., & Hurt, L. E. (2000). How do people evaluate social sexual conduct at work?: A psycholegal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 75–85. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project benefitted from funding by the Swiss National Science Foundation through its grant #130402 (“Employment Discrimination: When Observers Intervene and When They Don’t”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celia W. S. Chui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chui, C.W.S., Dietz, J. Observing Workplace Incivility Towards Women: The Roles of Target Reactions, Actor Motives, and Actor-Target Relationships. Sex Roles 71, 95–108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0367-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0367-7

Keywords

Navigation