Skip to main content
Log in

Mentioning Menstruation: A Stereotype Threat that Diminishes Cognition?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate menstruation as a stereotype threat that could have the effect of diminishing cognitive performance, 92 undergraduate women from a small, urban university in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States (US) completed two cognitive tasks, a Stroop test, and an SAT-based mathematics test, as well as a Menstrual History Questionnaire (MH) and the Menstrual Attitudes Questionnaire (Brooks-Gunn and Ruble 1980). The MH served as the menstruation stereotype threat. Some women were also presented with positive information about menstruation, which served as the positive prime. The order of materials varied to yield four conditions: Menstruation Threat/No Positive Prime—MH first, then cognitive tasks; Menstruation Threat/Positive Prime—MH first, then positive information, then cognitive tests; Positive Prime/No Menstruation Threat—positive information first, then cognitive tasks, then MH; and No Positive Prime/No Menstruation Threat—cognitive tests first, then MH. In all four conditions, participants completed the Menstrual Attitudes Questionnaire last. Results indicated that participants receiving the Menstruation Threat completed significantly fewer items on the Stroop test. In addition, subjects in the No Positive Prime/Menstruation Threat condition performed more poorly on the Stroop the closer they were to their next period. This effect was absent for the Positive Prime/Menstruation Threat condition and reversed for participants in the Positive Prime/No Menstruation Threat. This suggests that positive priming moderates the relationship between closeness to menstruation and cognitive performance. Implications of the results for addressing stigma associated with menstruation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Albert Wister.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Menstruation History/Threat

Positive Prime

Contrary to popular belief, research has shown that there are no negative effects of menstruation on cognition. In one study, healthy women aged 18–22 years were given cognitive performance tasks during various phases of the menstrual cycle. In a comparison of women who were premenstrual or menstruating with those who were not premenstrual or menstruating, there was no difference found in the ability to concentrate, or in motor abilities. Moreover, as measured by The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, creativity, and divergent thinking were improved for premenstrual and menstrual women in comparison with women who were not premenstrual or menstruating. Research has also shown that the sensory perception is enhanced during menstruation. This heightened sensitivity can enhance women’s self-awareness as well as their sensitivity towards environmental cues, and in turn contribute to personal growth, and improved relationship and practical problem-solving skills.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wister, J.A., Stubbs, M.L. & Shipman, C. Mentioning Menstruation: A Stereotype Threat that Diminishes Cognition?. Sex Roles 68, 19–31 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0156-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0156-0

Keywords

Navigation