Skip to main content
Log in

Here’s Looking at You: Self-Objectification, Body Image Disturbance, and Sorority Rush

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of sorority rush on self-objectification and body image disturbance. First-year undergraduate women either participating (n = 68) or not participating (n = 59) in sorority rush at a U.S. Midwestern university completed online surveys at four time points. It was predicted that rush participation would lead to increases in self-objectification, which in turn would lead to increases in body shame and eating disordered behavior and attitudes. Results supported predictions based on objectification theory at a single time point, but not longitudinally. Rush participants evidenced higher levels of self-objectification and eating disordered behavior at all time points. Body mass index predicted dropping out of the rush process and was negatively correlated with satisfaction with the rush process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, L. A. (1998). The prevalence of eating disorders and eating disordered behaviors in sororities. College Student Journal, 32, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, G., & Morier, D. (1994). The sorority rush process: Self-selection, acceptance criteria, and the effect of rejection. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 346–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The mediator-moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., Foran, K. A., & Bookwala, J. (2007). Body objectification, social pressure, and disordered eating behavior in college women: The role of sorority membership. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. B., Bull, S., Schaumberg, K., Cauble, A., & Franco, A. (2008). Effectiveness of peer-led eating disorders prevention: A replication trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 347–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. B., Smith, L. M., & Ciao, A. C. (2006). Peer-facilitated eating disorder prevention: A randomized effectiveness trial of cognitive dissonance and media advocacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 550–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessenoff, G. R., & Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., Davis, W. N., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohlan, M. (Director). (2006). Rushed [Online documentary]. Retrieved from http://www.marcuscohlan.com/.

  • Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing meditational models with longitudinal data: questions in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, T. S., Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M. M., & Tennen, H. (2007). Idiographic personality: The theory and practice of experience sampling. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 79–96). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, C. S. (1988). Social contagion of binge eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 588–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. (2007, February 25). Sorority evictions raise issues of looks and bias. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com.

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, D. M., Olmstead, M. P., Bohr, Y., & Garkinel, P. E. (1982). The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243–259). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., & Lin, J. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL (Version 8.80) [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

  • Keller, M. J., & Hart, D. (1982). The effects of sorority and fraternity rush on students’ self-images. Journal of College Student Personnel, 23, 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozee, H. B., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzeo, S. E. (1999). Modification of an existing measure of body image preoccupation and its relationship to disordered eating in female college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (1999). Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’ and daughters’ body experience in cultural, developmental, and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35, 760–769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (2006a). Longitudinal gender differences in objectified body consciousness and weight-related attitudes and behaviors: Cultural and developmental contexts in the transition from college. Sex Roles, 54, 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (2006b). The developmental and cultural contexts of objectified body consciousness: A longitudinal analysis of two cohorts of women. Developmental Psychology, 42, 679–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongell, S., & Roth, A. E. (1991). Sorority rush as a two-sided matching mechanism. The American Economic Review, 81, 441–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of sociocultural standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: An examination and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezlek, J. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J. (August, 2008). Anne Anastasi Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award: Approaches to hypothesis testing in mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prouty, A. M., Protinsky, H. O., & Canady, D. (2002). College women: Eating behaviors and help-seeking preferences. Adolescence, 37, 353–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., & Cathey, C. (2006). Body on my mind: The lingering effect of state self-objectification. Sex Roles, 55, 869–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulken, E. D., & Pinciaro, P. J. (1997). Sorority women’s body size perceptions and their weight-related attitudes and behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 46, 69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stice, E. (2002). Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 825–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stice, E., Marti, C. N., Spoor, S., Presnell, K., & Shaw, H. (2008). Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: Long-term effects from a randomized efficacy trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 329–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stice, E., Rohde, P., Gau, J., & Shaw, H. (2009). An effectiveness trial of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk adolescent girls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 825–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22, 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Boundy, M. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women’s self-objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., Hargreaves, D., Polivy, J., & McFarlane, T. (2004). A word-stem completion task to assess implicit processing of appearance-related information. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 73–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylka, T. L., & Subich, L. M. (2004). Examining a multidimensional model of eating disorder symptomatology among college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on the first author’s senior honors thesis completed at Northwestern University. This research was supported by a Northwestern University Undergraduate Research Grant and a Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences Undergraduate Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley Marie Rolnik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rolnik, A.M., Engeln-Maddox, R. & Miller, S.A. Here’s Looking at You: Self-Objectification, Body Image Disturbance, and Sorority Rush. Sex Roles 63, 6–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9745-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9745-y

Keywords

Navigation