Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes about Affirmative Action for Women: The Role of Children in Shaping Parents’ Interests

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses pooled cross-sectional data from the 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006 General Social Surveys (GSS), a nationally representative sample of the U.S. adult population, to assess how employed parents’ attitudes about affirmative action for women are influenced by their children’s gender. The analytic sample includes 1,695 employed respondents. Findings based on logistic regression indicate that having daughters (and no sons) magnifies employed mothers’ support for affirmative action for women and minimizes employed fathers’ support. Conversely, having sons (and no daughters) does not suppress mothers’ support for affirmative action for women, nor does it differentiate men’s attitudes about affirmative action. We speculate about how these patterns in parents’ attitudes relate to self interest and group interest (i.e., their children’s future work experiences).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baunach, D. M. (2002). Progress, opportunity, and backlash: Explaining attitudes toward gender-based affirmative action. Sociological Focus, 35, 345–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37, 401–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L. (1988). Group conflict, prejudice, and the paradox of contemporary racial attitudes. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 85–116). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L. (1998). Race, interests, and beliefs about affirmative action: Unanswered questions and new directions. American Behavioral Scientists, 41, 985–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L., & Kluegel, J. R. (1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes? American Sociological Review, 58, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientists, 27, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz-Uhler, B., & Murrell, A. J. (1998). Evaluations of affirmative action applicants: Perceived fairness, human capital, or social identity? Sex Roles, 38, 933–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. L., & Kawakami, K. (1996). Ethnicity and perceived discrimination in Toronto: Another look at the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 28, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, D. M., Desmarais, S., Branscombe, N. R., & Gee, S. S. (2005). Opposition to redistributive employment policies for women: The role of policy experience and group interest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 583–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. (1979). The wage effects of marital status and children. Journal of Human Resources, 14, 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillary Clinton endorses Barack Obama. (2008, June 7). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/us/politics/07/text-clinton.html.

  • Jencks, C. (2008, October 17). Reinventing the American dream. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B6.

  • Kane, E. W., & Whipkey, K. J. (2009). Predictors of public support for gender-related affirmative action: Interests, gender attitudes, and stratification beliefs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 223–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrynowicz, D. D., & Biernat, M. (1997). Decoding subjective evaluations: How stereotypes provide shifting standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 579–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1983). Affirmative action attitudes: Effects of self-interest, racial affect, and stratification beliefs on whites’ views. Social Forces, 61, 797–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. P., Lye, D. N., & Condran, G. A. (1988). Sons, daughters, and the risk of marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 110–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., Meen, J., & Robertson, D. J. (1995). The preconditions and consequences of relative deprivation: Two field studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 944–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Judgements of personal versus group discrimination and evaluations of subtle versus blatant bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 550–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, A. (1996). Gender and the welfare state. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, S., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Sons, daughters, and family processes: Does gender of children matter? Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology: Vol. 24 (pp. 1–91). San Diego: Academic Press Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O., Van Laar, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism? The origins of white Americans’ opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 16–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strolovitch, D. Z. (1998). Playing favorites: Public attitudes toward race- and gender-targeted antidiscrimination policy. NWSA Journal, 10, 27–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitude toward and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terkel, S. (1974). Working: People talk about what they do all day and how they feel about what they do. New York: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tougas, F., Crosby, F., Joly, S., & Pelchat, D. (1995). Men’s attitudes toward affirmative action: Justice and intergroup relations at the crossroads. Social Justice Research, 8, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuch, S. A., & Hughes, M. (1996). Whites’ racial policy attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 723–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, S. (1998). Thinking about the baby: Gender and transitions into parenthood. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R. L., & Steel, B. S. (1999). Child rearing as a mechanism for social change: The relationship of child gender to parents’ commitment to gender equity. Gender & Society, 13, 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, E. (2008). Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women’s issues. American Economic Review, 98(1), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia H. Prokos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prokos, A.H., Baird, C.L. & Keene, J.R. Attitudes about Affirmative Action for Women: The Role of Children in Shaping Parents’ Interests. Sex Roles 62, 347–360 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9739-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9739-9

Keywords

Navigation