Abstract
Based on the assertion that previous research may have inadvertently confounded two stereotypes, we considered the impact of benevolent sexism on rape victim blame in the context of independent manipulations of gender and the perceived genuineness (victim stereotypicality) of an acquaintance rape victim. We predicted that for blame, benevolent sexism may be independently positively associated with gender and victim counter-stereotypicality. Following pilot work, 120 Australian undergraduates read an acquaintance rape scenario. Results indicated that benevolent sexism was only positively associated with blame of the gender counter-stereotypical victim when that victim was also counter-stereotypical in terms of victim stereotypes. This result indicates a more moderate role than previously indicated for benevolent sexism in accounting for rape victim blame.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance and stranger rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Anderson, I., & Doherty, K. (2008). Accounting for rape: Psychology, feminism and discourse analysis in the study of sexual violence. Women and psychology. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Bateman, E. (1991). The context of date rape. In B. Levy (Ed.), Dating violence: Young women in danger (pp. 94–99). Seattle, WA: Seal.
Bechhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9–25). New York: Wiley.
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Stereotype activation and inhibition. Advances in social cognition, 11 (pp. 1–52). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Briody, M. (2002). The effects of DNA evidence on sexual offence cases in court. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 14, 159–181.
Buddie, A., & Miller, A. (2001). Beyond rape myths: a more complex view of perceptions of rape victims. Sex Roles, 45, 139–160.
Cook, B., David, F., & Grant, A. (2001). Sexual violence in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women’s social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319–325.
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779.
DuMont, J., Miller, K., & Myhr, T. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466–486.
Fiske, S., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individualting processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.
Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., Hamm, N. R., & White, K. B. (2003). Perceptions of the woman who breastfeeds: the role of erotophobia, sexism, and attitudinal variables. Sex Roles, 49, 379–388.
Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory; differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
Glick, P., Sakilli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & de Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297.
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as a simply antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
Gordon, M., & Reiger, S. (1991). The female fear: The social cost of rape. Chicago: University of Illinois.
Hebl, M. R., Kings, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1499–1511.
Herzog, S., & Oreg, S. (2008). Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law and Society Review, 42, 45–74.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2000). Masculine and feminine cultures. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, 5 (pp. 115–118). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K., & Turrisi, R. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 467–478.
Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class and race relations. Berkley: University of California Press.
Johnson, K. K. (1995). Attributions about date rape: impact of clothing, sex, money spent, date type, and perceived similarity. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23, 292–311.
Jordan, J. (2001). To believe or not to believe? Police responses to women rape complainants.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
Kelly, L. (2002). A research review on the reporting, investigation and prosecution of rape cases. London: Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate.
Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of Women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed.). Westport: Praeger/Greenwood Publishing Group.
Krahé, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 50–58.
Krahé, B. (1991). Social psychological issues in the study of rape. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 279–309). New York: Wiley.
Kunda, Z., & Sinclair, L. (1999). Motivated reasoning with stereotypes: activation, application, and inhibition. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 10–22.
Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522–544.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel constraint satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284–308.
Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B. D., & Spencer, S. J. (2002). The dynamic time course for stereotype activation: activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 283–299.
Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Jordan, C. (2003). The impact of comprehension goals on the ebb and flow of stereotype activation during interaction. Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium, 9, 1–20.
Lonsway, K., & Fitzgerald, L. (1994). Rape myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.
Marx, B. P., & Gross, A. M. (1995). Date rape: an analysis of two contextual variables. Behavior Modification, 19, 451–464.
Masser, B. M. (1998). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: A social psychological evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Canterbury: University of Kent.
Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: the consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51, 609–615.
Moya, M., Glick, P., Exposito, F., de Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206.
Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 296–302.
Scronce, C., & Corcoran, K. (1995). The influence of the victim’s consumption of alcohol on perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape. Violence Against Women, 1, 241–245.
Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: the system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 56, 743–754.
Spohn, C., & Spears, J. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649–679.
Stewart, M. W., Dobbin, S. A., & Gatowski, S. I. (1996). “Real rapes” and “real victims”: the shared reliance on common cultural definitions of rape. Feminist Legal Studies, 4, 159–177.
Vali, D., & Rizzo, N. (1991). Apparel as one factor in sex crimes against young females: professional opinions of U.S. psychiatrists. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 167–181.
Viki, G. T. N., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.
Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295–303.
Viki, G. T. N., Massey, K., & Masser, B. (2005). When chivalry backfires: benevolent sexism and attitudes toward Myra Hindley. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 109–120.
Wenger, A. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2006). The effects of a victim’s substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors’ judgments in an acquaintance rape case. Sex Roles, 54, 547–555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masser, B., Lee, K. & McKimmie, B.M. Bad Woman, Bad Victim? Disentangling the Effects of Victim Stereotypicality, Gender Stereotypicality and Benevolent Sexism on Acquaintance Rape Victim Blame. Sex Roles 62, 494–504 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y