Skip to main content
Log in

Doing and Undoing Gender in Sport Governance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Processes of sense making enable individuals to explain or give meaning to their experiences including those pertaining to gender. Meanings shape both individual behaviors and expectations for the behavior of others. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine how board members of national sport associations in the Netherlands made sense of gendered arrangements. We used a sense making approach that acknowledges the significance of context (gender ratio) and constructions of meaning in shaping organizational practices. The results, based on 29 semi-structured interviews, showed how board members gave meanings to gender skewness that included defining board work as gender (in) appropriate and sustaining and challenging behaviors defined as stereotypical. We discuss how the results reflect doing and undoing gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. In A. J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 248–262). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (1998). The future of ‘gender and organizations’: Connections and boundaries. Gender Work and Organizations, 5, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, K. A. (2005). Critical mass theory revisited: The behavior and success of token women in state legislatures. Politics & Gender, 1, 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, E., & Bekker, M. (1993). Leidinggevende vrouwen of vrouwelijke leidinggevenden? [Managing women or women managers?]. Tijdschrift voor Vrouwenstudies, 14, 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claringbould, I. (2006). Vrouwen in zicht [Women in view]. Nieuwegein, The Netherlands: Arko Sportsmedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claringbould, I., & Knoppers, A. (2007). Finding a ‘normal’ woman: Selection processes for board membership. Sex Roles, 56, 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, A. J., & Chelladurai, P. (1999). Managing cultural diversity in sport organizations: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 13, 280–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, J. S., Pastore, D. L., & Riemer, H. A. (2003). Managing employee diversity: Perceived practices and organizational outcomes in NCAA division III athletic departments. Sport Management Review, 6, 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Corporate entrepreneurs at work. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers, A., Meyer, B. B., Ewing, M., & Forrest, L. (1993). Gender ratio and social interaction among college coaches. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10, 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (2000). Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory, 1, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.) London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2001). ‘Mobilizing masculinities’: Women’s experiences of men at work. Organization, 8, 587–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2003). ‘Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17, 342–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practicing gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, E. M. (1989). Effects of the male–female ratio at work: Policewomen and male nurses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, S. (2001). Organizational cultures, women managers, and exclusion. Women in Management Review, 16, 371–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S. (2006). Scratching the back of “Mr. X”: Analyzing gendered social processes in sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 20, 510–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., & Hoeber, L. (2003). “A strong man is direct and a direct woman is a bitch”: Gendered discourses and their influence on employment roles in sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 17, 347–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., & Slack, T. (2002). ‘It’s been like that for donkey’s years’: The construction of gender relations and the cultures of sports organizations. Culture, Sport, Society, 5, 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, A., & Milgate, G. (2003). ‘She says, he says’: Women’s and men’s views of the composition of boards. Women in Management Review, 18, 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. (1997). Have times changed? Career barriers and the token women manager. British Journal of Management, 8, S121–S130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangl, J. S., & Kane, M. J. (1991). Structural variables that offer explanatory power for the under-representation of women coaches since Title IX: The case of homologous reproduction. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verweel, P. (2006). Sense making in sport organizations. In A. Knoppers & A. Anthonissen (Eds.), Making sense of diversity in organizing sport (pp. 18–28). Oxford, UK: Meyer & Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacjman, J. (1998). Managing like a man: Women and men in corporate management. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995). Sense making in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (2004). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management. Update 2004 Geneva: International Labour Office. Retrieved on August 9, 2006 from http://www.ilo.org/dyn/gender/docs/RES/292/F267981337/Breaking%20Glass%20PDF%20English.pdf.

  • Women (2004). Women, leadership and the Olympic Movement. Loughborough University, UK: International Olympic Committee and Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwide (2007). Worldwide guide to women in leadership. Retrieved on October 7, 2007 from http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/

  • Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender and Society, 5, 178–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, L. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems, 35, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inge Claringbould.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claringbould, I., Knoppers, A. Doing and Undoing Gender in Sport Governance. Sex Roles 58, 81–92 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9351-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9351-9

Keywords

Navigation