Abstract
Processes of sense making enable individuals to explain or give meaning to their experiences including those pertaining to gender. Meanings shape both individual behaviors and expectations for the behavior of others. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine how board members of national sport associations in the Netherlands made sense of gendered arrangements. We used a sense making approach that acknowledges the significance of context (gender ratio) and constructions of meaning in shaping organizational practices. The results, based on 29 semi-structured interviews, showed how board members gave meanings to gender skewness that included defining board work as gender (in) appropriate and sustaining and challenging behaviors defined as stereotypical. We discuss how the results reflect doing and undoing gender.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.
Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. In A. J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 248–262). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Acker, J. (1998). The future of ‘gender and organizations’: Connections and boundaries. Gender Work and Organizations, 5, 195–206.
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
Bratton, K. A. (2005). Critical mass theory revisited: The behavior and success of token women in state legislatures. Politics & Gender, 1, 97–125.
Burger, E., & Bekker, M. (1993). Leidinggevende vrouwen of vrouwelijke leidinggevenden? [Managing women or women managers?]. Tijdschrift voor Vrouwenstudies, 14, 42–57.
Claringbould, I. (2006). Vrouwen in zicht [Women in view]. Nieuwegein, The Netherlands: Arko Sportsmedia.
Claringbould, I., & Knoppers, A. (2007). Finding a ‘normal’ woman: Selection processes for board membership. Sex Roles, 56, 495–507.
Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106–127.
Doherty, A. J., & Chelladurai, P. (1999). Managing cultural diversity in sport organizations: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 13, 280–297.
Fink, J. S., Pastore, D. L., & Riemer, H. A. (2003). Managing employee diversity: Perceived practices and organizational outcomes in NCAA division III athletic departments. Sport Management Review, 6, 147–168.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Corporate entrepreneurs at work. London: Allen & Unwin.
Knoppers, A., Meyer, B. B., Ewing, M., & Forrest, L. (1993). Gender ratio and social interaction among college coaches. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10, 256–260.
Lorber, J. (2000). Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory, 1, 79–95.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.) London: Sage.
Martin, P. Y. (2001). ‘Mobilizing masculinities’: Women’s experiences of men at work. Organization, 8, 587–618.
Martin, P. Y. (2003). ‘Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17, 342–366.
Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practicing gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 254–276.
Ott, E. M. (1989). Effects of the male–female ratio at work: Policewomen and male nurses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 41–58.
Ridgeway, C. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235.
Rutherford, S. (2001). Organizational cultures, women managers, and exclusion. Women in Management Review, 16, 371–373.
Shaw, S. (2006). Scratching the back of “Mr. X”: Analyzing gendered social processes in sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 20, 510–534.
Shaw, S., & Hoeber, L. (2003). “A strong man is direct and a direct woman is a bitch”: Gendered discourses and their influence on employment roles in sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 17, 347–375.
Shaw, S., & Slack, T. (2002). ‘It’s been like that for donkey’s years’: The construction of gender relations and the cultures of sports organizations. Culture, Sport, Society, 5, 86–106.
Sheridan, A., & Milgate, G. (2003). ‘She says, he says’: Women’s and men’s views of the composition of boards. Women in Management Review, 18, 147–155.
Simpson, R. (1997). Have times changed? Career barriers and the token women manager. British Journal of Management, 8, S121–S130.
Stangl, J. S., & Kane, M. J. (1991). Structural variables that offer explanatory power for the under-representation of women coaches since Title IX: The case of homologous reproduction. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 47–60.
Verweel, P. (2006). Sense making in sport organizations. In A. Knoppers & A. Anthonissen (Eds.), Making sense of diversity in organizing sport (pp. 18–28). Oxford, UK: Meyer & Meyer.
Wacjman, J. (1998). Managing like a man: Women and men in corporate management. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Weick, K. (1995). Sense making in organizations. London: Sage.
Wirth, L. (2004). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management. Update 2004 Geneva: International Labour Office. Retrieved on August 9, 2006 from http://www.ilo.org/dyn/gender/docs/RES/292/F267981337/Breaking%20Glass%20PDF%20English.pdf.
Women (2004). Women, leadership and the Olympic Movement. Loughborough University, UK: International Olympic Committee and Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy.
Worldwide (2007). Worldwide guide to women in leadership. Retrieved on October 7, 2007 from http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/
Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender and Society, 5, 178–192.
Zimmer, L. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems, 35, 64–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Claringbould, I., Knoppers, A. Doing and Undoing Gender in Sport Governance. Sex Roles 58, 81–92 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9351-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9351-9