Skip to main content
Log in

Powerlessness and the Use of Indirect Aggression in Friendships

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggression in girls, especially indirect aggression perpetrated by girls toward other girls, has received increasing attention in the popular press. Various explanations have been offered to explain why girls might use indirect methods more so than boys, including both biological and social explanations. We tested a social contextual explanation; that is, that powerlessness is associated with the use of indirect aggression strategies. Power was conceptualized as both an individual difference variable and as an interpersonal variable. In two studies, we found that for both men and women, lack of power in same gender friendships (defined as anxiety about one’s status in friendships) was associated with greater use of indirect aggression strategies. Further, individual differences in deferent personality characteristics and lack of relational control in a friendship were unrelated to the use of indirect aggression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, A. M. (1970). The effect of female aggressiveness on aggressive and sexual fantasies. Journal of Projective Techniques, 34, 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992a). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., & Österman, K. (1992b). Direct and indirect aggression scales. Retrieved on September 20, 2000 from http://www.vasa.abo.fi/svf/up/scales.htm.

  • Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992c). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies of males and females. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemela (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51–64). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1976). Issues, problems, and pitfalls in assessing sex differences. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 22, 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R., Cairns, B., Neckerman, H., Ferguson, L., & Gariepy, J. (1989). Growth and Aggression: 1. Childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Sapochnik, M., & Muncer, S. (1997). Sex differences in aggression: Does social representation mediate form of aggression. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 161–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, P. (2002). Woman’s inhumanity to woman. New York: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eron, L. D., Huesmann, L. R., Lefkowitz, M. M., & Walder, L. O. (1972). Does television violence cause aggression? American Psychologist, 27, 253–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, N. D. (1969). Sex differences in children’s modes of aggressive responses towards outsiders. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 15, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frodi, A., Macaulay, J., & Thome, P. R. (1977). Are women always less aggressive than men? A review of the experimental literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 634–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geen, R. G. (1990). Human aggression. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladue, B. A. (1991). Qualitative and quantitative sex differences in self-reported aggressive behavioral characteristics. Psychological Reports, 68, 675–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1980). The adjective check list manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. R., Richardson, D. R., & Lago, T. (1996). How do friendship, indirect, and direct aggression relate? Aggressive Behavior, 22, 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. B., & Samerotte, G. (1975). The effects of aggressive and altruistic modeling on subsequent behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 95, 173–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, N., & Fry, D. (1994). Indirect modes of aggression among women of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Sex Roles, 30, 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankaanranta, R. V., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Björkqvist, K. (1993). Social structure of peer groups and indirect aggression among girls. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, K. M., & Björkqvist, K. (1994). Indirect aggression in boys and girls. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 131–150). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerspetz, K. M., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11- to 12-year old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A., & Lipscomb, T. J. (1988). Sex differences in children’s verbal aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D., Mattsson, A., Schalling, D., & Low, H. (1980). Testosterone, aggression, physical, and personality dimensions in normal adolescent males. Psychosomatic Medicine, 42, 253–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Österman, K., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., Kaukiainen, A., Huesmann, L., & Fraczek, A. (1994). Peer and self-estimated aggression and victimization in 8-year-old children from five ethnic groups. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. S. (2005). The myth of female passivity: Thirty years of revelations about female aggression. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. R., & Green, L. R. (1997). Circuitous harm: Determinants and consequences of nondirect aggression. In R. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 171–188). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. R., & Green, L. R. (1999). Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1976). A macro- and micro-examination of family power and love: An exchange model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagrestano, L. M. (1992). Power strategies in interpersonal relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. H. (1989). Cultural factors, biology, and human aggression. In J. Groebel & R. Altinde (Eds.), Aggression and war: Their biological and social bases (pp. 173–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R. (2002). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M., & Hillman, J. L. (1993). The perceived value of direct and indirect influence strategies: A cross-cultural perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 457–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, S. K., & Lucca, J. S. (1988). Husband battering. In V. B. Van Hasselt, R. L. Morrison, A. S. Bellack, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of family violence (pp. 233–246). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 151–166). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towson, S. M. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1982). Toward a situational analysis of gender differences in aggression. Sex Roles, 8, 903–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American Psychologist, 44, 695–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., & Richardson, D. R. (1998). Aggression strategies among older adults: Delivered but not seen. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, J. W. (1983). Sex and gender issues in aggression research. In R. G. Green & E. I. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews, (vol. 2, pp. 1–26). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (1994). Deconstructing the myth of the nonaggressive woman: A feminist analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 487–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1992). A revised scoring system for the power motive. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 311–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R. (2002). Queen bees and wannabes: Helping your daughter survive cliques, gossip, boyfriends, and other realities of adolescence. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (2003). Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Sarbani Hazra and Nevena Zhelyazkova for their help with data processing and Bill Peterson and Eileen Zurbriggen for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Duncan.

Additional information

Study 1 was based, in part, on the second author’s undergraduate Honors Thesis, which was supported by a grant from Smith College’s Tomlinson Fund. Study 2 was supported by a grant from Smith College to the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duncan, L., Owen-Smith, A. Powerlessness and the Use of Indirect Aggression in Friendships. Sex Roles 55, 493–502 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9103-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9103-2

Keywords

Navigation