Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Differences in Playful Aggression During Courtship in College Students

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study explored gender differences in college students' definitions and enjoyment of playful force and aggression. Ninety-six female and 55 male college students who were predominantly White (96%) and heterosexual (97%) answered questions about playful force during sex and playful aggression at other times. A content analysis showed that the current definitions were very similar to those for children's rough-and-tumble play. However, a qualitative analysis found several potential gender differences. Physically aggressive men appeared to give aggressive definitions of playful force during sex. In addition, there was some disagreement among participants as to the acceptability of playful force during sex. Finally, there may be gender differences in the assumed agency of playful force and aggression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, A. (1991). Misperception as an antecedent of acquaintance rape: A consequence of ambiguity in communication between women and men. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 96–111). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A. (1992). Forms and functions of intimate play in personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 18, 336–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke, T. M., & DeJoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bograd, M. (1990). Why we need gender to understand human violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 132–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, M. J. (1991a). Partner preferences in middle school children's play fighting and chasing. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, M. J. (1991b). A comparison of structural and contextual features of middle school children's playful and aggressive fighting. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, D. M., & Crosby, L. (1997). Observed and reported psychological and physical aggression in young, at-risk couples. Social Development, 6(2), 184–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., O'Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (1999). Factor structure and convergent validity of the Conflict Tactics Scale in high school students. Psychological Assessment, 11, 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology (pp. 81–110). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. L., Beckett, J., Wells, M., & Dungee-Anderson, D. (1994). Courtship violence among African-American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 264–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. A. (1991). Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Family Relations, 40, 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, M. (1990). Beyond the evil empire: Horseplay and aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 16, 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2003). Adolescents' perceptions of the seriousness of sexual aggression: Influence of gender, traditional attitudes, and self-reported experience. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A. P., & Smith, P. K. (1986). Rough-and-tumble in preschool and playground. In P. K. Smith (Ed.), Play in animals and humans (pp. 241–266). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A. P., & Smith, P. K. (1987). Rough and tumble, friendship, and dominance in schoolchildren: Evidence for continuity and change with age. Child Development, 58, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L., & Simpson, S. S. (1991). Courtship violence and social control: Does gender matter? Law and Society Review, 25(2), 335–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S. R. St. J. (1976). Aggressive and non-aggressive fighting in twelve-to-thirteen year old pre-adolescent boys. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1989a). Elementary school children's rough-and-tumble play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1989b). What is a category? The case of rough-and-tumble play. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1989c). Categorizing children's rough-and-tumble play. Play and Culture, 2, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1992). Rough-and-tumble play and social problem solving flexibility. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Rough-and-tumble play from childhood through adolescence: Development and possible functions. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 438–453). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (2003). Perceptions and functions of play and real fighting in early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 1522–1533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. M. (1995). Do courtship violent men have characteristics associated with a “battering personality?” Journal of Family Violence, 10(1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. M. (1998). The relationship between courtship violence and sexual aggression in college students. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, M. E. C. (1993). The effects of selective evaluation on the perception of female cues in sexually coercive and noncoercive males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 415–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Boulton, M. (1990). Rough-and-tumble play. Aggression and dominance: Perception and behavior in children's encounters. Human Development, 33, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Henderson, D. A. (1991). Contextual factors surrounding a conflict resolution while dating: Results from a national study. Family Relations, 40, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2003). Discourse analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 159–183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn M. Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, K.M., Mohr, S. Gender Differences in Playful Aggression During Courtship in College Students. Sex Roles 53, 591–601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7144-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7144-6

Keywords

Navigation