Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maintaining the Double Standard: Portrayals of Age and Gender in Popular Films

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of the top 100 domestic grossing films of 2002 found evidence of a lingering double standard for aging female and male characters. Overall, major male characters outnumbered major female characters (73% vs. 27%); the majority of male characters were in their 30s and 40s, and the majority of female characters were in their 20s and 30s. Both women and men in their 60s and older were dramatically underrepresented compared to their representation in the US population. For male characters, leadership and occupational power increased with age. Men in their 40s, 50s, and 60s were more likely to play leadership roles and wield occupational power than were their female counterparts. As female characters aged, they were less likely to have goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkin, D. J., Moorman, J., & Lin, C. A. (1991). Ready for prime time: Network series devoted to working women in the 1980s. Sex Roles, 25, 677–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzini, D. G., McIntosh, W. D., Smith, S. M., Cook, S., & Harris, C. (1997). The aging woman in popular film: Underrepresented, unattractive, unfriendly, and unintelligent. Sex Roles, 36, 531–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, F. (2002, February 2). Catering to the elderly can pay off. New York Times, sec. 3, p. 11.

  • D’Alessandro, A. (2003, January 6–12). Top 250 of 2002. Variety, pp. 26–27.

  • Davis, D. M. (1990). Portrayals of women in prime-time network television: Some demographic characteristics. Sex Roles, 23, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (1989). Audience as listener and learner, teacher, and confidante: The sense-making approach. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (2nd. ed, pp. 67–86). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drecksel, G. L. (1991). Leadership research: Some issues. Communication Yearbook, 14, 535–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, K. (1985). Television and sex-role acquisition 2: Effects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elasmar, M., Hasegawa, K., & Brain, M. (1999). The portrayal of women in U.S. prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(1), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, T. (1999, May 10). Enlightened age. Adweek, p. 20.

  • Gabler, N. (2003, April). The tyranny of 18 to 49: American culture held hostage. Los Angeles: Annenberg School for Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (1980). Aging with television: Images on television drama and conceptions of social reality. Journal of Communication, 30, 37–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, H., Fox, S., & Smith, E. (1993). Patronizing the elderly: Intergenerational evaluations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glascock, J. (2001). Gender roles on prime-time network television: Demographics and behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 656–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. S. (1980). Life on television: Content analyses of U.S. TV drama. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. S., Korzenny, R., & Atkin, C. (1980). Trends in the portrayal of the elderly. In B. S. Greenberg (Ed.), Life on television (pp. 23–34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guider, E. (2002, September 23–29). Boomers are goners as they hit the gray wall. Variety, pp. 8, 93.

  • Holson, L. M. (2004, January 18). And the winner is ... the older woman. New York Times, sec. 3, p. 12.

  • Korzenny, F., & Neuendorf, K. (1980). Television viewing and self-concept of the elderly. Journal of Communication, 30, 71–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30, 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japp, P. M. (1991). Gender and work in the 1980s: Television’s working women as displaced persons. Women’s Studies in Communication, 14, 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laditka, S. B., Fischer, M., Laditka, J. N., & Segal, D. R. (2004). Attitudes about aging and gender among young, middle age, and older college based students. Educational Gerontology, 30, 403–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (1999). Making a difference in prime time: Women on screen and behind the scenes in the 1995–96 television season. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Equal time in prime time? Scheduling favoritism and gender on the broadcast networks. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46, 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauzen, M. M., Dozier, D. M., & Hicks, M. V. (2001). Prime-time players and powerful prose: The role of women in the 1997–1998 television season. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 261–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, S. R., Lichter, L. S., & Rothman, S. (1994). Prime time: How TV portrays American culture. Washington, DC: Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConatha, J. T., Schnell, R., Volkwein, K., Riley, L., & Leach, E. (2003). Attitudes toward aging: A comparative analysis of young adults from the United States and Germany. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 57, 203–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (1982). Television and adolescents’ sex role stereotypes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 947–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motion Picture Association of America. (2003). 2002 U.S. movie attendance study. Retrieved from http://mpaa.org/useconomicreview/content.htm.

  • Nelson, T. (Ed.). (2002). Ageism: Stereotypes and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, A. M., Camp, C. J., & Osofsky, H. J. (1993). Knowledge of and attitudes toward aging in young, middle-aged and older college students: A comparison of two measures of knowledge of aging. Educational Gerontology, 19, 753–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M. (2004, January 17). No silver age for Hollywood. Los Angeles Times, E22.

  • Passuth, P. M., & Cook, F. L. (1985). Effects of television viewing on knowledge and attitudes about older adults: A critical reexamination. Gerontologist, 25, 69–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, C. W., & Gurtman, M. B. (1990). Evidence for the automaticity of ageism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P. (1987). Organization theory: Structure, design, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. D., & Skill, T. (1995). The invisible generation: Portrayals of the elderly on prime-time television. Communication Reports, 8, 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, A., Swerdlow, E. [Executive Producers], & Wilson, H. [Director]. (1996). The First Wives Club [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount.

  • Shields, V. R. (1999). Advertising to the general audience: Using sense-making to illuminate how audiences decode advertisements of idealized female bodies. Electronic Journal of Communication, 9, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40, 527–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skill, T., & Robinson, J. D. (1994). The image of Christian leaders in fictional programs. Sociology of Religion, 55, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1972, September 23). The double standard of aging. Saturday Review, pp. 29–38.

  • Tedesco, N. S. (1974). Patterns in prime time. Journal of Communication, 25, 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Detailed tables P12: Sex by age [49]. Retrieved from http://factfmder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_ts=76848142529

  • Van de Berg, L. R., & Streckfuss, D. (1992). Prime-time television’s portrayal of women and the world of work: A demographic profile. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36, 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, J. A., Williams, J. A., Phillips, T., & Wilson, J. (1991). Media stereotyping: A comparison of the way elderly women and men are portrayed on prime-time television. Journal of Women and Aging, 2, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha M. Lauzen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauzen, M.M., Dozier, D.M. Maintaining the Double Standard: Portrayals of Age and Gender in Popular Films. Sex Roles 52, 437–446 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3710-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3710-1

Keywords

Navigation