Abstract
Women are underrepresented in the professoriate compared to men; this study was designed to examine whether systemic barriers associated with parenting discourage women from pursuing academic careers. Data from 468 female and male graduate students were collected through an online questionnaire. More men than women intend to pursue academic careers. Parenting and mobility issues—but not research or teaching issues—were more negatively associated with entering the professoriate for women than for men. However, women were not more interested in having children than men were. Results support the hypothesis that women self-select away from academia in response to perceived systemic barriers related to parenthood. To ensure quality and equity in academia, universities should enact policy that addresses the realities of childbearing and childrearing women.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aisenberg, N., & Harrington, M. (1988). Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove. {plAmherst: The University of Massachusetts Press}.
American Association of University Professors [AAUP]. (2001). Statement of principles on family responsibilities and academic work. Retrieved January 5, 2004, from http:// www.aaup.org/statements/REPORTS/re01fam.htm
Armenti, C. (2004). May babies and posttenure babies: Maternal decisions of women professors. Review of Higher Education, 27, 211–231.
Biernat, M., & Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844–860.
Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275–302.
Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.
Canadian Association of University Teachers [CAUT]. (2002). Ivory towers: Feminist audits. Year 2002 figures. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://www.caut.ca/english/issues/ women/Audit2002.asp
Canadian Association of University Teachers [CAUT]. (2003). CAUT almanac of post-secondary education in Canada.Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://www.caut.ca/english/publications/cautalmanac/CAUTAlmanac2003.pdf
Caplan, P. J. (1993). Lifting a ton of feathers: A woman's guide to surviving in the academic world.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Collins, L. H., Chrisler, J. C., & Quina, K. (Eds.). (1998). Arming Athena: Career strategies for women in academe.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Committee on Women Faculty, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1999). A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Retrieved January 6, 2004, from http:// web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.pdf
Cook, S. G. (2001). Students give failing grade to PhD programs. Women in Higher Education Newsletter, 10, 27–28. Retrieved December vn10, 2003, from http://hau www.phd-survey.org/news/ wihe%20article.htm
Equal Rights Advocates. (2003). Creating gender equity in academia. Retrieved December 25, 2003, from http:// universitywomen.stanford.edu/reports/Creating gender equity academia.pdf
European Technology Assessment Network [ETAN]. (2002). Science policies in the European Union: Promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/etan/docs/women.pdf
Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education (www.phd-survey.org). Philadelphia: Pew Charitable Trusts.
Graham, P. A. (1970, September 25). Women in Academe. Science, 169, 1284–1290.
Irvine, A. D. (1996). Jack and Jill and employment equity. Dialogue, XXXV, 255–291.
Kimura, D. (1997). Affirmative action policies are demeaning to women in academia. Canadian Psychology, 38, 238–243.
Kimura, D. (1999, November 4). Best person not always hired under affirmative action [Opinion]. Simon Fraser News, 16. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www. sfu.ca/ mediapr/ sfnews/1999/nov4/kimura.html
Kimura, D. (2002, January 10). Researcher thanks preferential hiring survey participants [Letter to the editor].UBC Reports, 48. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/ubcreports/2002/02jan10/02jan 10let.html
Kite, M. E., Russo, N. F., Brehm, S. S., Fouad, N. A., Hall, C. C. I., Hyde, J. S., et al. (2001). Women psychologists in academe: Mixed progress, unwarranted complacency. American Psychologist, 56, 1080–1098.
Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.
Mason, M., & Goulden, M. (2002). Do babies matter? The effect of family formation on the lifelong careers of academic men and women. Academe, 88, 21–27.
Miller, J., & Chamberlin, M. (2000). Women are teachers, men are professors: A study of student perceptions. Teaching Sociol-ogy, 28, 283–299.
National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2002). Table 171, Chapter 3: Post-secondary education. In Digest of education statistics. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid =2002130.
O'Reilly, A. (Ed.). (2003). Mothering in the academy. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 5(2).
Pittman, J. F., Teng, W., Kerpelman, J. L., & Solheim, C. A. (1999). Satisfaction with performance of housework: The roles of time spent, quality assessment, and stress. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 746–770.
Roth, S. (2003). Report of the steering committee for the women's initiative at Duke University. Retrieved December 25, 2003, from http://www.duke.edu/womens initiative/report report.htms
Ruble, D. N., Fleming, A. S., Hackel, L. S., & Stangor, C. (1988). Changes in the marital relationship during the transition to first time motherhood: Effects of violated assumptions concerning division of household labour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 78–87.
Simeone, A. (1987). Academic women: Working towards equality. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roless, 41, 509–528.
The Chilly Collective (Eds.). (1995). Breaking anonymity: The chilly climate for women faculty. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 27, 233–257.
Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 557–594.
Wilson, R. (1999, June 25). Timing is everything: Academe's annual baby boom. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45, A14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anders, S.M.v. Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive Barriers to Becoming Professors. Sex Roles 51, 511–521 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5461-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5461-9