Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychologists’ Experience with Interviewing and Analyzing Abuse Allegations of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abuse among persons with an Intellectual Disability is a significant problem. In contrast to the gravity of this problem, there currently exists a gap in Practitioners’ ability to use a recognized and standardized approach to interview or analyze abuse cases when investigating them. This survey was an initial exploration of the practices of a sample of Downstate NY Psychologists regarding their training, supervision and processing of abuse allegations. A primary finding indicates that there isn’t a consistently used, standardized method of interviewing and analyzing accounts of physical, emotional and sexual abuse from persons with an intellectual disability. Also, the psychologists indicated that they followed their supervising psychologists’ guidance when interviewing and then analyzing interviews for credibility, which were not standardized across areas sampled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Razza, N.J., Tomasulo, D.J., Truama, H.: The Power of Group Treatment for People with Intellectual Disabilities. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Furey, E.M., Niesen, J.J.: Sexual abuse of adults with mental retardation by other consumers. Sex. Disabil. 12, 285–295 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Dudley, J.: Confirmed, unconfirmed and false allegations of abuse among consumers with developmental disabilities who are members of a class action lawsuit. Child. Abuse. Negl. 25, 1121–1132 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Massachusetts Clinical Placement Online Orientation@ http://www.mass.edu/mcncps/orientation/m1Abuse.asp

  5. Finlay, W., Lyons, E.: Acquiescence in interviews with people who have mental retardation. Ment. Retard. 40, 14–29 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gudjonsson, G.H., Murphy, G.H., Clare, I.C.H.: Assessing the capacity of people with intellectual disabilities to be witnesses in court. Psychol. Med. 30, 307–314 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gudjonsson, G., Henry, L.: Child and adult witnesses with intellectual disabilities: the importance of suggestibility. Leg. Criminol. Psychol. 8, 241–252 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Green, G.: Vulnerability of witnesses with learning disabilities: preparing to give evidence against a perpetrator of sexual abuse. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 29, 103–109 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nathanson, R., Platt, M.: Attorneys’ perceptions of child witnesses with mental retardation. J. Psychiatr. Law. 33, 5–42 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peled, M., Iarocci, G., Connolly, D.: Eyewitness testimony and perceive credibility of youth with mild intellectual disability. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 48, 699–703 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dent, H.R.: An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning mentally handicapped child witnesses. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 25, 13–17 (1986)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perlman, N.: The developmentally handicapped witness: competency as a function of question format. Law. Hum. Behav. 18, 171–187 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pillay, A., Sargent, C.: Psycho legal issues affecting rape survivors with mental retardation. South Afr. J. Psychol. 30, 9–14 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milne, R., Clare, I., Bull, R.: Interrogative suggestibility among witnesses with mild intellectual disabilities: the use of an adaption of the GSS. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 15, 8–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Valenti-Hein, D., Schwartz, L.: Witness competency in people with mental retardation implications for prosecution of sexual abuse. Sex. Disabil. 11, 287–294 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuille, J., Hunter, R., Joffe, R., Zaparnuik, J.: Interviewing children in sexual abuse cases. In: Goodman, G., Bottoms, B. (eds.) Child Victims Child Witnesses: Understanding and Improving Testimony. The Guildford Press, New York (1993)

  17. Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., Raymond, D.S., Jurkevich, L.M., Warhaftig, M.L.: Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: refining the cognitive interview. J. Police Sci. Adm. 15, 291–297 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stein, L.M., Memon, A.: Testing the efficacy of the cognitive interview in a developing country. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 20, 597–605 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright, A.M., Holiday, R.E.: Interviewing cognitively impaired older adults: how useful is a cognitive interview? (Manuscript submitted for publication)

  20. Saywitz, K.J., Esplin, P.W.: New directions in forensic and clinical research: a holistic approach to interviewing and treating children in the legal system. In: Pipe, M.E., Lamb, M., Orbach, Y., Cederborg, A.C. (eds.) Child Sexual Abuse: Disclosure, Delay and Denial, pp. 1–46. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lamb, M.E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y. Esplin, P.W.: Tell Me What Happened: Structured Investigative Interviews of Child Victims and Witnesses. Blackwell, NY (2008)

  22. Raskin, D.C., Esplin, P.W.: Assessment of children’s statements of Sexual abuse. In: Doris, J. (ed.) The Suggestibility of Children’s Recollection, pp. 153–164. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lino Faccini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faccini, L., Saide, M.A. Psychologists’ Experience with Interviewing and Analyzing Abuse Allegations of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Sex Disabil 29, 291–296 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-011-9206-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-011-9206-8

Keywords

Navigation