Abstract
Data sharing platforms are being constructed to make clinical cohort data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Their primary purpose is to enhance the sharing of data. However, the lack of incentives for data sharing has been conceptualized in both scientific literature and policy documents as a problem of science policy. As platforms can only facilitate data sharing through technical means, they may not be able of fully resolving the data sharing problem. In this article, it is shown how the design of platforms may help in addressing policy barriers to data sharing in the long-term. In essence, platforms can be made into policy instruments that generate information on the data sharing process and the functionality of data access committees. This allows platforms to be used to inform science policy development, to monitor data sharing practices and to steer funding prioritization for cohorts and data infrastructures themselves. In this way, the creation of data infrastructures is closely connected to the policy evolutions in the context of open science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Allen, L., O’Connell, A., & Kiermer, V. (2019). How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the contributor role taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1210
Altman, M., Borgman, C., Crosas, M., & Matone, M. (2015). An introduction to the joint principles for data citation. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 41(3), 43–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2015.1720410313
Altmetrics Working Group of the Open Science Policy Platform (2017). Recommendations of the OSPP on next-generation metrics. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/ospp_metrics_wg_recommendations_final.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
Bauermeister, S., Orton, C., Thompson, S., Barker, R. A., Bauermeister, J. R., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Brayne, C., Burn, D., Campbell, A., Calvin, C., Chandran, S., Chaturvedi, N., Chêne, G., Chessell, I. P., Corbett, A., Davis, D. H. J., Denis, M., Dufouil, C., Elliott, P., & Gallacher, J. E. J. (2020). The dementias platform UK (DPUK) data portal. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35(6), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00633-4
Bezuidenhout, L., & Chakauya, E. (2018). Hidden concerns of sharing research data by low/middle-income country scientists. Global Bioethics, 29(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2018.1441780
Bierer, B. E., Crosas, M., & Pierce, H. H. (2017). Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(17), 1684–1687. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1616595
Bierer, B. E., Li, R., Barnes, M., & Sim, I. (2016). A global, neutral platform for sharing trial data. The New England Journal of Medicine, 374(25), 2411–2413. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1605348
Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2019). Global perspectives of research data sharing: A systematic literature review. Library and Information Science Research, 41(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.004
Costas, R., Meijer, I., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2013). The value of research data metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view. A knowledge exchange report. Retrieved from www.knowledge-exchange.info/datametrics
Corrêa, E. A., Silva, F. N., Costa, L. F., & Amancio, D. R. (2017). Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.03.003
Cousijn, H., Feeney, P., Lowenberg, D., Presani, E., & Simons, N. (2019). Bringing citations and usage metrics together to make data count. Data Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-009
Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Darby, R., Gitmans, K., Lambert, S., Matthews, B., Mele, S., Suhonen, J., & Wilson, M. (2014). Enabling sharing and reuse of scientific data. New Review of Information Networking, 19(1), 16–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2014.883936
Devriendt, T., Ammann, C., Asselbergs, F. W., Bernier, A., Costas, R., Friedrich, M. G., Gelpi, J. L., Jarvelin, M. R., Kuulasmaa, K., Lekadir, K., & Mayrhofer, M. T. (2021). An agenda-setting paper on data sharing platforms: euCanSHare workshop. Open Research Europe, 1, 80. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13860.1
Devriendt, T., Borry, P., & Shabani, M. (2022). Credit and recognition for contributions to data-sharing platforms among cohort holders and platform developers in Europe: Interview study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1), e25983. https://doi.org/10.2196/25983
Devriendt, T., Shabani, M., & Borry, P. (2020). Data sharing platforms and the academic evaluation system. EMBO Reports, 21(8), e50690. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050690
Fagan, J., Eddens, K. S., Dolly, J., Vanderford, N. L., Weiss, H., & Levens, J. S. (2018). Assessing research collaboration through co-authorship network analysis. The Journal of Research Administration, 49(1), 76–99.
Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Data Access Review Standards (GA4GH DACRes) Working Group. (2021). Data Access Committee guiding principles and procedural standards policy. Retrieved from https://www.ga4gh.org/genomic-data-toolkit/regulatory-ethics-toolkit/
Howard, H., Mascalzoni, D., Mabile, L., Houeland, G., Rial-Sebbag, E., & Cambon-Thomsen, A. (2018). How to responsibly acknowledge research work in the era of big data and biobanks: Ethical aspects of the bioresource research impact factor (BRIF). Journal of Community Genetics, 9(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0332-6
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046
Leonelli, S. (2017). Mutual learning exercise : Open science—altmetrics and rewards incentives and rewards to engage in open science activities. Retrieved from https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/policy-support-facility/mle-open-science-altmetrics-and-rewards
Mongeon, P., Smith, E., Joyal, B., & Larivière, V. (2017). The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship. PLoS ONE, 12(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184601
Murtagh, M. J., Turner, A., Minion, J. T., Fay, M., & Burton, P. R. (2016). International data sharing in practice: New technologies meet old governance. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 14(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2016.0002
Oliveira, J. L., Trifan, A., & Bastião Silva, L. A. (2019). EMIF catalogue: A collaborative platform for sharing and reusing biomedical data. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 126, 35–45.
Pinel, C., Prainsack, B., & McKevitt, C. (2020). Caring for data: Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 50(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720906567
Rice, D., Raffoul, H., Ioannidis, J., & Moher, D. (2020). Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of biomedical sciences: A cross-sectional analysis of 146 universities. BMJ, 369, 2081. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2081
Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V., & Nane, G. F. (2020). Task specialization across research careers. eLife, 9, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60586
Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1
Shabani, M., & Borry, P. (2016). “You want the right amount of oversight”: Interviews with data access committee members and experts on genomic data access. Genetics in Medicine, 18(9), 892–897. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.189
Shabani, M., Dyke, S. O. M., Joly, Y., & Borry, P. (2015). Controlled access under review: Improving the governance of genomic data access. PLoS Biology, 13(12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002339
Sim, I., Stebbins, M., Bierer, B. E., Butte, A. J., Drazen, J., Dzau, V., Hernandez, A. F., Krumholz, H. M., Lo, B., Munos, B., Perakslis, E., Rockhold, F., Ross, J. S., Terry, S. F., Yamamoto, K. R., Zarin, D. A., & Li, R. (2020). Time for NIH to lead on data sharing. Science, 367(6484), 1308–1309. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba4456
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J. W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., & Mons, B. (2016). Comment: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Working Group on Rewards under Open Science. (2017). Evaluation of research careers fully acknowledging open science practices. European Commission.
Wouters, P., Ràfols, I., Oancea, A., Caroline, S., Kamerlin, L., Britt, J., & Jacob, M. (2019). Indicator frameworks for fostering open knowledge practices in science and scholarship. European Commission.
Funding
TD, PB, KL have received funding from the European Commission under the grant agreement No. 825903 (euCanSHare project).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: TD. Writing—original draft: TD. Writing—review and editing: MS, KL, PB. Supervision: MS, PB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Devriendt, T., Shabani, M., Lekadir, K. et al. Data sharing platforms: instruments to inform and shape science policy on data sharing?. Scientometrics 127, 3007–3019 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04361-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04361-2